@dimlylitlantern: Not always. I believe the abridged explanation for adamantium's usage is that secondary adamantium is far more common while primary almost exclusively refers to Wolverine. Given how easily Weapon H could cut Hulk, I find this explanation to be more plausible.
Primary Adamantium used to get retconned as secondary whenever it would be broken by raw force. Except when it wouldn't. Either way, none of that applies here.
Weapon H could damage Hulk because he is far stronger than a Titanium crushing arm or Wolverine. That means that unlike the other incarnations, this Hulk can be damaged by it -- provided the wielder is strong enough. Ergo, Wolverine cannot damage him with anymore since he doesn't qualify.
This isn't secondary unless clarified otherwise.
I'm more so saying that Superman and WW, with their rapid movement combined with high damage output, would bring Hulk to his limit to the point he was overwhelmed.
I don't see how. Neither are untouchable to him, for starters.
There is a big difference, but why would Superman's power in both lifting and striking be so wildly disproportionate? Especially considering that Superman's punches are normally what other heroes and villains find so impressive? It is more crazy to think that he can't with the relative ease he demonstrated with the planet lifting feat. That's like me lifting a feather but you not believing I can tear it up. The difference between the Grey Hulk example and Superman is that GH hasn't lifted Earth for a week, stood in multiple black holes with no strain, tanked 8 planetary explosions while weakened, flown through a red giant with a weakness to it, tossed a war world while weakened, tanked more planets exploding, tanked supernova's blowing up on him, or consistently harmed multiple planetary+++ characters. I could tell you that it makes perfect sense that Superman can bust a planet while weakened, because he does similar things while weakened all the time.
There is a huge difference between a planet and a feather. To break one, you need to overcome it's gravitational binding energy and distribute the force in a specific way. I honestly think you're overestimating Superman's feats:
stood in multiple black holes with no strain,
He's had issues with them as well. Many times. He once needed Kyle to save him from one. Like I said, he is all over the place when it comes to that. If being inside a black hole is supposed to make you planet buster, I guess Red Hulk is one as well.
tanked 8 planetary explosions while weakened
When was this? Regardless, 8 exploding planets or 800, he would only be getting hit by a tiny fraction of the total energy output. Such is the nature of explosions. This has nothing to do with the innate ability to bust planets though.
flown through a red giant with a weakness to it
Doesn't make him a planet buster.
tossed a war world while weakened
I am pretty sure he was amped.
tanked more planets exploding, tanked supernova's blowing up on him,
Come on man, due you honestly not understand the difference between tanking a teeny tiny fraction of an explosion and tanking all of it?
All his so called "planetary durability" feats have been this.
consistently harmed multiple planetary+++ characters.
Like who exactly? Remember tanking an exploding planet =/= tanking the full brunt of a planet busting attack.
I could tell you that it makes perfect sense that Superman can bust a planet while weakened, because he does similar things while weakened all the time.
It really doesn't. None of the examples you cited have anything to do with planet busting and he has had multiple sub planetary feats even when at full strength.
Log in to comment