I'm really not sure about these. This is what I thought.
Thanos (Base): 150
-Kurse: 150
-Hela: 135
-Thor (Post-Ragnarok): 70
-Hulk: 100
-Hulk Buster: 50 maybe
-Abomination 25
-Thor (Pre-Ragnarok) Not sure.
-Loki 20
Thor actually has better strength feats than Hulk post IW. But I don't feel like he should be above Hulk and Hulk should probably still be able to overpower him.
is battle wiki ever considered to be a valid resource? Cos kurse is put down as class 7B or higher, which makes him a city-buster at least apparently??? Seems a bit off to me??
is battle wiki ever considered to be a valid resource? Cos kurse is put down as class 7B or higher, which makes him a city-buster at least apparently??? Seems a bit off to me??
Interesting, my list is quite different, in honesty I am utterly, utterly bewildered that people have placed Thanos above Kurse, can someone please explain this to me?
Thanos (Base) 120
Kurse 300
Hela 110
Thor (Post-Ragnarok) 100
Hulk 100
Hulk Buster 105
Abomination 90
Thor (Pre-Ragnarok) 90
Loki 85
@miekskywalker I am totally, totally perplexed by your list, so many questions, but here are the ones that are making me pull faces:
You think this one side being only 40% stronger than the other
but this is one side being 150% stronger than the other
!?!?
Thor couldn't budge Kurse, Hulk was able to knock Thanos over (by surprise), but was also able to consistently knock Thanos back even after it was no longer a surprise.
Kurse's single punches were sending Thor back >100ft, Thanos' punches weren't even knocking Hulk back more than a couple of steps.
Who you think between Thanos and Kurse is stronger is another question (Thanos never fought pre-Ragnarok Thor and Kurse never fought post-Ragnarok Thor, so we can't really know), but you cannot deny that Kurse was stronger than Thor by more than Thanos was stronger than Hulk by. To say that Kurse is only 40% stronger than the Thor he fought, but Thanos was 150% stronger than Hulk here is really confusing me.
This is not accounting skill and energy based power. For example, Hela might be able to throw Hulk with leverage the same way a smaller judo guy can throw a bigger guy, and make it look effortless. Thor's lightning makes his striking power much higher than Hulks, and Stormbreaker adds even more force on top of that. Stuff like that I generally ignore. In terms of pure muscular strength, I think Hulk is the strongest. The only one that can match him pound for pound imo is Thanos. Thanos being vastly more skilled lets him make Hulk look like a rookie the same way a boxer would school a bodybuilder in a fist fight.
@aka_aka_aka_ak: It seems that you rate how strong someone is based on how far he knocks his oponent, in reality it's based on who he can hurt or be hurted by.
Kurse lifted a 100 ton + rock. Thus puts him above Thanos in strength feats alone. Thor did zero damage to him, and he embarrassed thor more than Hulk did in the avengers. Compare their fights. Also, Thor was pissed when fighting kurse (killed his mom), but he was trying to restrain Hulk initially. Even in ragnarok, Thor was taking the majority in their Sakaar fight (despite not fighting 100% initially), Thor even H2H Hulk for awhile. But Hulk eventually became more pissed and pinned him down, in the end Thor used his lighting mode which easily overpowered the Hulk.
If we scale that fight, Kurse would be wrecking Hulk with ease.
Thanos seems to be slightly stronger than the Hulk with far better form. Highly doubt he is stronger than Kurse
@aka_aka_aka_ak: It seems that you rate how strong someone is based on how far he knocks his oponent, in reality it's based on who he can hurt or be hurted by.
No, that's not how strength works. It is precisely about how far back you can knock people. In reality this and how much it hurts should be the same thing, but how much it hurts is influenced by things like pressure and where they're hit, how far they're knocked back is effected by only one thing, how much force they're hit with.
Why do you think it's about how much you get hurt? I find it bizaree to prioritise that over how far you're knocked back. A whip hurts, but it doesn't mean you're getting hit with as much force as something like a kick, which'll hurt less but knock you back much further.
"in reality it's based on who he can hurt or be hurted by." so you're saying that in reality how far you're knocked back has nothing at all to do with how hard you're hit. Sorry but that's asinine.
No, that's not how strength works. It is precisely about how far back you can knock people. In reality this and how much it hurts should be the same thing, but how much it hurts is influenced by things like pressure and where they're hit, how far they're knocked back is effected by only one thing, how much force they're hit with.
Why do you think it's about how much you get hurt? I find it bizaree to prioritise that over how far you're knocked back. A whip hurts, but it doesn't mean you're getting hit with as much force as something like a kick, which'll hurt less but knock you back much further.
"in reality it's based on who he can hurt or be hurted by." so you're saying that in reality how far you're knocked back has nothing at all to do with how hard you're hit. Sorry but that's asinine.
That's some really flawed logic there. Hulk has taken, without bleeding, hits from Thor with Mjolnir, hits from Thor with the sakaar hammer that sent him flying across the arena, lightning amped punches from Thor that created a massive shockwave, a skyscrapper falling on him, etc. But somehow that Thanos made him bleed but didn't sent him flying is a low showing??
You have to take into account that Thanos was already considered the most powerful individual in the universe BEFORE obtaining any of the gems. Why in the world would it be a low showing for Hulk to lose against him? This is the same Thanos that with punches alone destroyed Iron Man's suit (you know, the one that tanked a meteorite falling on him).
Tell me something, if someone, let's say DCEU Darkseid, made Superman bleed with a punch but didn't sent him flying, would you consider it a low showing for Superman?
-Thanos (Base) 200 (The strongest person that we've seen so far)
-Kurse 150 (I would say Kurse absolutely demolished Thor, and if it wasn't for his great durability, it would have looked a lot like the Thanos vs Hulk fight)
-Hela 125 (Hela was on equal footing with Thor, but a better fighter)
-Thor (Post-Ragnarok)120 (After his lightning boost, Thor was easily overpowering the Hulk with mere punches)
-Abomination 90 (He was obviously weaker than the Hulk once the Hulk found his footing)
-Hulk Buster 80 (Tony had to resort to using the environment to his advantage to hold his ground)
-Thor (Pre-Ragnarok) 50 (It took 2 arms to hold Hulks arm back, and again in Thor Ragnarok)
-Loki 40 (Strong enough to hold his own against Thor)
No, that's not how strength works. It is precisely about how far back you can knock people. In reality this and how much it hurts should be the same thing, but how much it hurts is influenced by things like pressure and where they're hit, how far they're knocked back is effected by only one thing, how much force they're hit with.
Why do you think it's about how much you get hurt? I find it bizaree to prioritise that over how far you're knocked back. A whip hurts, but it doesn't mean you're getting hit with as much force as something like a kick, which'll hurt less but knock you back much further.
"in reality it's based on who he can hurt or be hurted by." so you're saying that in reality how far you're knocked back has nothing at all to do with how hard you're hit. Sorry but that's asinine.
That's some really flawed logic there. Hulk has taken, without bleeding, hits from Thor with Mjolnir, hits from Thor with the sakaar hammer that sent him flying across the arena, lightning amped punches from Thor that created a massive shockwave, a skyscrapper falling on him, etc. But somehow that Thanos made him bleed but didn't sent him flying is a low showing??
You have to take into account that Thanos was already considered the most powerful individual in the universe BEFORE obtaining any of the gems. Why in the world would it be a low showing for Hulk to lose against him? This is the same Thanos that with punches alone destroyed Iron Man's suit (you know, the one that tanked a meteorite falling on him).
Tell me something, if someone, let's say DCEU Darkseid, made Superman bleed with a punch but didn't sent him flying, would you consider it a low showing for Superman?
You're mixing bits of what I'm saying with bits of what you're saying...
I am saying: knock back=strong hit
You are saying: pain=strong hit
Neither of us is saying: knock back=pain <==> no knock back=no pain
"You have to take into account that Thanos was already considered the most powerful individual in the universe BEFORE obtaining any of the gems."
Lol what!? I'm assuming you're referring to Korath's quote, which is meaningless, he was either mistaken or meant 'power' as in 'influence' (i.e. Trump has a lot more 'power' than me, but he couldn't beat me in a fight). Thanos is not above Celestials, Surtur and I'd argue Hela/Odin too.
"Tell me something, if someone, let's say DCEU Darkseid, made Superman bleed with a punch but didn't sent him flying, would you consider it a low showing for Superman?"
No, I'd consider a low strength showing for Darkseid.
Are you disputing physics?! It's Newton's second law, F=ma. Force is proportional to acceleration, low acceleration (low knock back)=low force, this is indisputable. A whip hurts, but it has low knock back because it's about pressure rather than force.
Thanos was considered the most powerful being in the Universe by someone who had never seen Dormmamu, Surtur, Odin, et cetera. So we know for a fact that there are more powerful beings within the Universe, just not by the limited scope of the individual who made the statement.
Thanos was considered the most powerful being in the Universe by someone who had never seen Dormmamu, Surtur, Odin, et cetera. So we know for a fact that there are more powerful beings within the Universe, just not by the limited scope of the individual who made the statement.
Also he may have been talking about power to include his armies and resources, in the same way a president has 'power'. (he has been shown to have at least two armies, is able to decimate advanced civilisations like Xandar (without any stones) and several city-sized ships)
i agree with everything u say except i think kurse is 100-150 too. i just think thanos nd hela will beat him due to been faster and massive skill gap nd possibly a fatal or one shot weapons . d dude embarrassed thor worse dan thanos
thor could not budge him a bit he no sold all thor punches and slapped a lighting enhanced hammer return better dan thanos did nd he wasnt really trying
@el-kun: I could be convinced he’s a bit stronger but I disagree he embarrassed Thor worst all he did was beat on Thor like the Hulk, Thanos has had Thor half dead or KOd at least 3 times and with no where near the same amount of attacks.
@finalkingthanos: and i could also argue dat thor was weaker against thanos .seeing as in age of ultron an exploding 4km landmass only gave thor a little bruise .yet 7 kurse blows dropped him so bad he couldnt move while against thanos he was still preventing thanos from pushing d axe in. d dude was a monster now for reasons i stated above he cant beat thanos not even close . be in strength alone he should be right dere with hela and thanos maybe even more
once in motion thor blows nd headbutts were literally bouncing off d dude
@el-kun: I 100% disagree EG Thor was weaker than the dark world especially with both his best weapons and unlocked full lightning powers.
He was awake and defending himself against Kurse all be it getting battered like I said it was more similar to the Hulk arena fight where Hulk is smashing on Thor, Thanos literally knocks him out with a kick after almost impaling him with his own axe if not for Cap.
@el-kun: I 100% disagree EG Thor was weaker than the dark world especially with both his best weapons and unlocked full lightning powers.
He was awake and defending himself against Kurse all be it getting battered like I said it was more similar to the Hulk arena fight where Hulk is smashing on Thor, Thanos literally knocks him out with a kick after almost impaling him with his own axe if not for Cap.
It’s not close at all mate.
he wasnt defending shit on d ground he was flat out wide and bleading all over his fore head. like i said i could say endgame thor could be weaker if we to use the five years drinking nd self pity stuff. my point is only thanos, nd kurse has removed blood from thor with dier fists so dey are very much in d same class of strength and striking
Log in to comment