How many Saibamen does it take to beat Naruto ?

I'd say about 2

None it is impossible. How many Sorbets does it take to beat Goku?

@tobi-wan: thats a way bigger gap than naruto and a saibamen

1

fixed

I smell bait.

Fixed

stinky smelly disgusting bait the type of bait only midnight dragon would throw

I agree at least put some work into it.

@princearagorn1@thedarkpaladin

@never_give_up: if i wanted bait i would of equalized stats and take away ki blast.

That was a skills battle and other battles had ki blasts. Which leads me to this below.

This is because against Saiyan Saga characters the debate is 50/50. The Naruto debaters on this site are pretty dang good. The DB debaters then get irritated since they're losing then have to put down Naruto while showing DB's superiority(DB only has strong characters nothing else really). It gets quite annoying I don't even like Naruto but damn lol. You're saying it takes 2 Saibamen to defeat Naruto in an extremely lazy attempt to get under Naruto debaters skin.

This thread was so poorly done that's there's no indication of the battlefield or starting distance.

Have some honor with your bait and stop being lazy.

@marczaddy

I'll get porcorn, this is going to be a mess.

@never_give_up: a "skill" battle where you said hit isn't impressive...lol okay man,i didn't mean to rustle you.

Edit: if it isn't stated by the op, then everything is standard.

@midnightdragon18: There is really no gap.

The way you people measure a character's power is bias to many other characters. This whole battle forum has a huge flaw not just the DB fanbase. Why are we measuring every character's power by destructive capacity and then disregard every other potent ability as hax? What about mental capacity for telepaths like MM, Uchihas, etc. What about all other abilities?

People don't realize that this type of measure of power is bias because there are characters like Beerus whose power is destruction itself.

As for this thread it is weak bait constructed upon flawed logic.

That was to make the DB debaters form better arguments because we all know how good they are at forming actual arguments.

How am I rustled I'm not a Naruto fan? Lol.

12.

1

No info in the OP.

It can't be 2 because of the starting distance I'm thinking of and Shadow Clones.

We don't even know where the battle takes place.

What starting distance are you thinking of.

Several. He could honestly one-shot the saibamen. They weren't that impressive. They're supposed moon busters, but they don't have any feats that suggest this. I also doubt that the Z-Fighters (with the exception of Piccolo and Goku) were capable of destroying the moon during the SS saga (Piccolo was the only character that legit destroyed the moon, but that's a possible outlier). Even then, Piccolo was much stronger than the Saibamen and several of them were taken out by the even weaker Krillin.

It doesn't help that the Saibamen don't have any solid durability feats. When a Saibamen took out Yamcha (via suicide bombing) he barely left a crater. Naruto could probably take out hundreds with a mountain destroying attack.

1

@never_give_up: you're over thinking it tbh, if nothing is stated then it's standard rules and a generic area.

anyway, have fun.

@never_give_up: Idk, I was pulling out numbers outta nowhere xD

I LOVE YOU!

The part that I bolded is so true! You can't beat him if you aren't a planet buster. DB debaters constantly rely on "busting" levels. When various other fictional characters aren't as one dimensional and have different ways to defeat other characters without destroying a city. Just like Goku can be taken with a Genjustu even though he's at "whatever buster level people think he's at now".

This battle doesn't include starting distance or anything else. Characters aren't stupid like Yamcha other characters like Naruto and others are actually tactical and use their brains in combat. But let me guess Saibamen killed Yamcha with the explosion and Yamcha passed a certain power level and he had moon durability and DC. This could have been a better discussion with starting distance and an actual battlefield.

At least a few. Lol at 1.

@thedarkpaladin: They never give up, do they?

@never_give_up: I was summoned. What's the issue?

@marczaddy: Unfortunately not.

Just for a good laugh nothing else :)

@tobi-wan: You're right about that.

The bait is low level.

Honestly about 89 or 50.

Pretty much.

But that's his job (Never_give_up) to equalize stats in every naruto thread he makes. Or was it DarkPaladin?

Try harder @juzacloud.

@never_give_up: Appreciate it. The nonsense that will likely spawn will be worth it, I hope.

I never knew that Naruto and Genjustus could make someone this upset.

@never_give_up: Of course. No one can take when their faves lose to a "trash" series.

I never understood why people hate Naruto so much.

@never_give_up: I'm not sure if they do. :\

Quite a few maybe

@never_give_up: Muahahaha. Thanks to you I just looked further into getting my old account back. and somehow it now works.

I shall now retire Omni Troll

The return of JUZACLOUD has come. The Heavens applaud with universe shaking claps. The earth mourns beneath thy heels.

You shall be spared Never_G and I grant you this card when you're losing a debate.

Wanking and lowballing aside... more than 1, less than 5. Naruto is not that much higher than Raditz level.

No, I was just the one proving the DB fans wrong as always. ;)

@amendment50: That was bait. About 10 or 19 should make it but it all depends.

Powerscailling wise 3 to 5 imo.

Feat wise not sure.

Bump

If I had to guess anywhere from 3 to 10 should be enough, anything over is overkill because let's face it, they're all moon busters