How Long Would IW Iron Man Last Against DCEU Doomsday?
He gives a semi decent fight like Diana, but just eventually gets stomped. LMAO to getting one shotted.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
Lmao, inform the national medie everyone, Iron Man tanked a meteor.
Let's all just forget the gravity was explicitly shown and stated to be weaker. Let's just ignore that, and the fact Doosmday punch has a much more narrow surface area. Thanos dented his helmet with one strike and ripped it off.
Yeah if you think Tony is tanking one of those on the helmet you're fanboying hard.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
That's because he is Batman... duh.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
He gives a semi decent fight like Diana, but just eventually gets stomped. LMAO to getting one shotted.
Weaker gravity or not those chunks traveled hundreds of km per second and had serious mass. Tony can handle doomsday
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
yeah he lasts for a good while before going down
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
Even assuming the rock weighted 100 lbs. The fact is it traveled hundreds of thousands of kilometers in a sec or two. The impact of that is well beyond anything Doomsday or Speedblitzman has shown
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
if your going to state something as a fact back it up
There are wankers who think Stark gets one shotted. People, give the guy some credit: his stuff is pretty darn impressive. In fact, theres nothing stopping Tony from BFRing Doomsday
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
If the blast was as powerful as you think it was, that small piece of stone that Batman hid under would have been destroyed and he would have been killed, period. There is nothing you can say to change that. You can continue posting line after line of useless drivel and it won't change that one simple fact.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
If the blast was as powerful as you think it was, that small piece of stone that Batman hid under would have been destroyed and he would have been killed, period. There is nothing you can say to change that. You can continue posting line after line of useless drivel and it won't change that one simple fact.
So you ignore the multiple buildings flying around because one stone doesn't move? Wtf?
Talk about downplaying, keep going my boy.
Doomsday's striking power is literally shit. He has no impressive or quantifiable feats. Making the sound barrier break and sending 170 pound men flying through skyscraper glass is not above striking feats that even Wonder Woman or Superman have. I mean he couldn't even do anything to Diana or Superman. Not even cosmetic injuries or them being stunned for several minutes. They would literally get hit, shrug it off like it was nothing, and then keep fighting. Doomsday's durability is HILARIOUSLY above his offensive output. Iron Man would last a long time, but eventually his nanites would run out. I don't really think he'd be able to do anything to Doomsday either since he's extremely durable. Lmao at him being one-shotted. That's absolutely hilarious.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
If the blast was as powerful as you think it was, that small piece of stone that Batman hid under would have been destroyed and he would have been killed, period. There is nothing you can say to change that. You can continue posting line after line of useless drivel and it won't change that one simple fact.
So you ignore the multiple buildings flying around because one stone doesn't move? Wtf?
Talk about downplaying, keep going my boy.
No downplaying at all. Fact, Batman survived by hiding under a stone. As I already said:
The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
It's not my fault it was inconsistent and allowed Batman to survive by hiding under a stone that is much less durable than what Doomsday had already destroyed with the same blast. Complaing to Zack Snyder about that one.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
If the blast was as powerful as you think it was, that small piece of stone that Batman hid under would have been destroyed and he would have been killed, period. There is nothing you can say to change that. You can continue posting line after line of useless drivel and it won't change that one simple fact.
So you ignore the multiple buildings flying around because one stone doesn't move? Wtf?
Talk about downplaying, keep going my boy.
No downplaying at all. Fact, Batman survived by hiding under a stone. As I already said:
The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
It's not my fault it was inconsistent and allowed Batman to survive by hiding under a stone that is much less durable than what Doomsday had already destroyed with the same blast. Complaing to Zack Snyder about that one.
That's all I needed to hear.
Glad to know we're on the same page.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
If the blast was as powerful as you think it was, that small piece of stone that Batman hid under would have been destroyed and he would have been killed, period. There is nothing you can say to change that. You can continue posting line after line of useless drivel and it won't change that one simple fact.
So you ignore the multiple buildings flying around because one stone doesn't move? Wtf?
Talk about downplaying, keep going my boy.
how is that downplaying when it was shown on screen? perfectly clear
I love all the desperate and shoddy excuses for the meteor feat. "It looked slow", "the gravity was messed up", "the rock was barely the size of a house", etc. The hilarious thing is that even if any of those horrible arguments had any merit, that's still basically a small mountain being crushed on top of Stark. Period. The density and weight of minerals, rocks, boulders, etc. is extremely high. Boulders 2-3 times as big as humans alone weigh over 100 tons. It's still, at the very least, tens of thousands of tons (that's being very conservative) being smashed on top of him. Not only that, but this is an impact which he tanked like a champ and afterwards proceeded to withstand a continuous beam from the power gem and several hits from a guy stronger than Hulk. But yeah, he gets one-shotted. Also, LMFAO at Thanos not being strong enough to kill street levelers with his punches. Yeah, I'm sure he was hitting them as hard as he did to Hulk, Thor, Iron Man, etc.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
if your going to state something as a fact back it up
That's rich coming from you.
Clearly destroying and tossing buildings.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
If the blast was as powerful as you think it was, that small piece of stone that Batman hid under would have been destroyed and he would have been killed, period. There is nothing you can say to change that. You can continue posting line after line of useless drivel and it won't change that one simple fact.
So you ignore the multiple buildings flying around because one stone doesn't move? Wtf?
Talk about downplaying, keep going my boy.
how is that downplaying when it was shown on screen? perfectly clear
We've moved past that, try to keep up please.
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
if your going to state something as a fact back it up
That's rich coming from you.
Clearly destroying and tossing buildings.
yet at the end batman didn't have a scratch on him try harder fam
doomsday now hits harder then a meteor everybody
Doomsday blast had a bigger aoe, and that was probably the weakest meteor to date.
yet it couldn't kill Batman
Ok, and?
He took cover under an object that couldn't be blown back, I would have survived too.
An object that couldn't be blown back? It was nothing more than a piece of stone. The same stone that Doomsday's AoE's had already destroyed without much difficulty.
OT: I do not, for one second, believe that Stark could beat Doomsday, but I believe he could last as long as, if not longer than Diana. Unlike her, he has the ability to fly away to rest for a few seconds and think of another plan.
Well it wasn't blown back, don't know what your point here was.
The fact that you are trying to say that Batman survived because he hid under a stone. The very same stone that Doomsday had already destroyed. So either A, the blast is nowhere near as powerful as you like to believe, or B It is very inconsistent.
No correlation at all.
The Blast AoE>Meteor AoE
The Blast damage>Meteor damage
All of this proven by this.
Batman survived under a stone wall that wasn't blown back so the blast wasn't powerful?
The blast tossed buildings around.
So I'm going to want it again, what's your point?
if your going to state something as a fact back it up
That's rich coming from you.
Clearly destroying and tossing buildings.
yet at the end batman didn't have a scratch on him try harder fam
OK so with what you said I'm getting Batman>Iron Man in durability. Thanks for clearing that up, really helped me.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment