It's the usual OPM hype. As soon as OPM is involved, people tend to lose brain cells and just randomly start shouting as to how "CHARACTER X BLITLZES LOL GG NO RE F PHYSICALS!!"
With this much distance, no way in hell Garou can blitz Shigaraki before he releases a city-wide decay. Even if he does blitz him, the decay will kill him regardless. Also, this, "Muh Garou durability" is probably the stupidest argument I've heard in a while... and the attempt to label Decay as NLF by bringing up Thanos is just sad. A bloodsucking tick living on Thanos' body has better durability than OPM verse. They don't compare.
OT: Shigaraki kills Garou no question whatsoever. The real question is whether Garou can blitz Shigaraki before he gets dusted.
Whats wrong with that? They can bring up Old King Thor too. Why not? If its actually breaking down all solids regardless of durability he can dust both.
Because Thanos and Garou are like 10 tiers apart. Using Thanos to claim Decay wouldn't work on him so it shouldn't on Garou is faulty logic and strawman. Garou and Shigaraki are in the same ballpark, so, unless Garou has anti-disintegration feats, he dies.
Claiming NLF only works if the character is simply too absurdly powerful against whatever hax he is paired with... example, King Thor vs Shigaraki. In this case, if I were to claim "Decay GG" it would be NLF due to the absurd power difference.
So, yes, if you wish to argue Garou can survive a hax that ignores durability, you have to provide anti said hax feats.
Thats irrelevant. The argument was, the durability did not matter due to the nature of the attack which is indeed a NLF (unless there is a source). Saying decay would work on Garou, who is commonly claimed to be more durable than the entire MHA verse (not true imo), without giving a reason/feats and solely basing it on "thats the nature of the power" is the same as doing it againts OKT. If it ignores durability it doesnt matter if the durability of the opponent is a million times better than a human or octillions of times better.
Wrong on all accounts. Decay does ignore durability and NFL only works if there is a huge power difference and Garou does not have better durability than the entire MHA verse. Giantomachia collapsed a whole mountain on himself and no sold it.
Bringing characters who can fart away OPM verse to downplay a hax to which you have no answer is again, sad. Not to mention, both Thor and Thanos have resisted disintegration on numerous accounts so your argument is once again, null and void by default.
1-> Your NLF argument doesn't work because Garou does not have a huge durability or power advantage.
2-> Characters you bring up have no relation to Garou and are so hilariously above OPM that using them as a defense is just bad debating and sad. Also, it simply shows you have absolutely zero answer or counter to Decay.
3-> The mere idea that Decay shouldn't work on Thanos so it wouldn't work on Garou is so laughable that I am almost tempted so simply ignore this entire conversation.
4-> Using your stupid logic, Garou's punches wouldn't harm Thanos, therefore, they are NLF and wouldn't harm Shigaraki.