I wanna say Gambit, but for some reason Leo winning makes sense to me. Gambit obviously has the range attacks with his cards. But Leo is agile enough to avoid being hit and can get up in Gambits grill. A master of the sword who is also a master of the martial arts, vs a master of the bo staff with some nice hand to hand skills but nothing on the level of a master.
Dammit, I'll say Leo.
I should ban you both.
Anyway, I'll say that if Leo can handle the cards (however he manages to do that) he should do well against Gambit. Gambit's a skilled fighter with his hands and his staff, but Leo probably has a lot more experience dealing with a master of the bo staff (thanks to Donatello) than Gambit has against a master of twin katanas.
Do you think leo can grab the charged kinetic cards without blowing up and redirect them right back at gambit?
I think this fight would be really interesting. I agree with gambler's 1st reply. Leo has the agility to get to gambit. plus he's stronger and faster (for a giant turtle hahaha)
and i know gambit's retracting bo staff is crome. something leo can easily slice in half if he wanted to.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment