Oh yeah, I bet if Colossus says that he can wreck Living Tribunal, you're gonna believe his word too.
No because that would not fit with his FEATS. This matches what he is saying as Hulk has tanked stroner attacks than that of Colossus.
Also, why would he lie about not hurting hulk???? That literally makes no sense.
When someone gets slapped, they don't grimace in pain like Hulk did. But I guess you're an expert in sphere of being slapped.
Yes, they do child. If you are slapped hard enough, you will make a certain face EVEN IF THE SLAP DIDN'T HURT YOU. That same with a punch. A punch will move you face towards the force of the attack, eve if the attack didn't hurt you.
One thing is clear, you are worthless when it comes to knowing anything about a fight.
I guess you're also an expert on fighting now. Guess that's why you're having so much trouble with basic logic.
I am not a pro but I have been boxing for more than 5 years now. SO yes, I know more that some piece of shit like you.
At very worst Colossus was stunning Hulk with this hits, seeing as he didn't make any attempts to fight back during these 4 panels. Which is, coincidently (or not?) something he does several pages later as well.
But he wasn't........ Hulk was not stunned at all after a barrage of these attacks. NOT A SINGLE BIT. And he didn't fight back because Colossus was coming at him with fast attacks. Again, it is clear you don't know how a fight works. If someone comes at you with speed, he can land multiple hits on you before you can even react.
THAT IS COMMON LOGIC.
Which still has nothing to do with Colossus KOing Hulk. Done with your pitiful red herrings now?
Yes it does child. The fact that he got hurt by something that stupid means that when Colossus Ko'd him, THAT WAS PIS AS WELL. How hard is this for you??? Not to mention, just before, even with many hits, he couldn't even draw blood from the same hulk.
How is common logic a red herring to you?
Which may have something to do with Hulk not tanking his hits.
He literally tanked all of them but here, he got knocked out with 1 hit. ONE CHILD. ONE. That is the definition of PIS.
Child, that was the writers way to convey to us that he was weakened..... A writer will not waste space to just write bullshit. You are so desperate now that you are literally going against the words of the comic. FOLLOW THE COMIC AND DON'T MAKE UP YOUR OWN SHIT.
Entire comics are wasted on bullshit written by writers. But I guess you didn't know that either, since you can't read for shit.
Why would this be a waste when they are trying to describe the opponent????? Why would they lie??? You are literally making shit up just to suit your narrative.
On-panel evidence ~ my words >> Colossus words.
A trained fighter, like Colossus, will know when something is working or not. There is literally no reason for him to say his punches were not working IF THEY WERE NOT. This is not a random statement like Spider Man claiming he can beat Surfer, this statement is based on what he was feeling/expering when the fight was happening.
There is literally ZERO need for him to lie. ZERO. And you have no on panel statements except for some face expressions that mean jack shit when Hulk was not even fazed by all those hits and grabs Colossus elbow like nothing after all that beating. LIKE NOTHING.
Because once again, Colossus is an expert on gamma mutates who can determine their physical condition with a quick glance. Or at least, that's what you're trying to claim.
No, but that was the writers way of explaining to us that he was weakened...... Hulk was literally burned by random fire and was screaming in pain from that fire. THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF BEING WEAKENED AS HULK HAS TANKED ATTACKS HOTTER LIKE NOTHING.
This has nothing to do with being an expert, this is seeing your opponent is hurt and deducing he is WEAKENED. IT IS NOT THAT HARD.
Based on words of unreliable narrator (Colossus), who had no experience, knowledge or abilities needed to make a conclusion of Hulk being weakened.
LMAOOOO. Did you not see how hulk was in pain from some random fire attack??? Did you not see him trying to out water on his attacks? When the heck has hulk even needed to do these shit.
If we use your stupid logic, every time some characters says someone is weakened, we should ignore it. Child, that is the writers was of telling us things they want to comvey. THEY DO THIS THROUGH THE CHARACTERS. And child, any common person can differentiate between something like Spidy saying he can beat Galactus to him saying Colossus punches are not hurting hulk.
The writers except you to have some common logic.
Considering it wasn't a backhand, but a straightforward punch (Hulk's fist clenched and his arm straightened up, with no indication that it was moved to the side, like blur or moving lines), I fail to see how this is relevant.
Look how the contact happened. From the image, we can see that hulk hit him with the back of the hand becasue of the direction Colossus is shown to be throw at. A BACK HAND.
And you didn't see moving lines??? Where wasn't there any movies lines here when it obvious Hulk have him a full swing?:
Oh, I thought you were a Hulk expert and would see through my mistake, but no, you just rushed in and made yourself look like an idiot. So much for being an expert.
Just because I am a hulk debator doesn't mean I will remember every piece of convo Green Scar had in WWH.... And how did I make myself look like an idiot? I literally destroyed you with proof from the same comic. It was YOU who made yourself look like an idiot to even suggest that Colossus could be a match for Green Scar.
And yeah, "my little hooker" is the most cringeworthy insult attempt I've seen on this site. At least you're consistent - you're shitty in reading, debating AND trash-talking.
Ohhhh, are you crackky today? Daddy beat you because you didn't make enough money on the streets today? Don't worry, ask daddy for some d, you will feel better. It's okay.... tomorrow is a new day.
It's double standard because you're taking one character statement as absolute truth while completely disregarding the second one, with only difference in statements being: the first is convinient to your argument, and the next is extremely inconvinient.
No child, Colossus words are describing what is happening in the moment (backed up by hulk's durability feats) while what Green Scar said, was a random statement, BACKED UP BY NOTHING. As I told you before, if spiderman says I can beat surfer and in a fight and if a fight with Thor, where he is punching thor and his punches are doing nothing and he says that, that it is clear that his statement about beating surfer was just that, A STATEMENT.
You have to learn how to separate the 2.
No, because Thanos' statement doesn't imply that Hulk would beat him. It implies that fighting Hulk (and putting him down for good) is more trouble than its worth. Which should be extremely obvious to anyone with moderate comic book knowledge and a sliver of common sense.
Putting hulk down with be more trouble??? Are you high? Sure Thanos can't one shot hulk but he will make Hulk his bitch in a matter of minutes. More trouble??? How will hulk even harm someone as durable as Thanos??? How is that more trouble child? Hulk can literally do nothing to Thanos, easily after what Thanos has done to high-high tiers and even herald level opponents.
It is now clear you don't have that "moderate" comic book logic you talk about.
Log in to comment