I don't think sif and the warriors three will be all that much help, but the asgardians should win nonetheless.
Well, I know that the Warriors Three had very little battle exposure outside the first movie but I am including for Sif her appearance in Agents of SHIELD where she demonstrated she has super-strength (at least compared to a human), so I feel if the WT don't stand much of a chance, she might at least. I really wish the Warriors had more screen time.
Thor could do it alone but not easily unless he one shotted (with city bust attack) extra asgardians are useless unless they can tag faora whuch they could buy not very often.
Faora is faster but Thor is better at literally everything else by feats.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning. If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it. Faora also has far more durability than Thor, who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
Faora is faster but Thor is better at literally everything else by feats.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning. If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it. Faora also has far more durability than Thor, who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
Technically he has limited flight only capable with his hammer, not sustainable flight, at least as the movies showed us. Sorry, just a small point, where as Faora can leap immense distances.
Also, very good point with the blade, Faora withstood a blast from a military grade rocket which helped level a small town square.
Faora is faster but Thor is better at literally everything else by feats.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning. If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it. Faora also has far more durability than Thor, who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
Technically he has limited flight only capable with his hammer, not sustainable flight, at least as the movies showed us. Sorry, just a small point, where as Faora can leap immense distances.
Also, very good point with the blade, Faora withstood a blast from a military grade rocket which helped level a small town square.
Flight is flight, as far as I'm concerned. He's definitely going to be using Mjolnir all throughout the fight.
The only way I can really see Thor standing a chance is if he tags Faora with lightning, which, rather than hurting her, would possibly destroy the environmental aspects of her suit. Other than that, he doesn't stand a chance.
Faora is faster but Thor is better at literally everything else by feats.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning. If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it. Faora also has far more durability than Thor, who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
Technically he has limited flight only capable with his hammer, not sustainable flight, at least as the movies showed us. Sorry, just a small point, where as Faora can leap immense distances.
Also, very good point with the blade, Faora withstood a blast from a military grade rocket which helped level a small town square.
Flight is flight, as far as I'm concerned. He's definitely going to be using Mjolnir all throughout the fight.
The only way I can really see Thor standing a chance is if he tags Faora with lightning, which, rather than hurting her, would possibly destroy the environmental aspects of her suit. Other than that, he doesn't stand a chance.
Well, as we saw, their suits take A LOT of damage even to disrupt whatever form of facial shielding they have, so I am not sure lightning could do the trick. I mean, 50 caliber machine gun bullets, military grade rockets, close range grenade launcher, and even eye blasts from Superman didn't completely damage their suits.
As for Thor, yeah, he definitely isn't dropping Mjolnir any time soon, considering it's a big deciding factor in about 99% of his fights.
I mean, 50 caliber machine gun bullets, military grade rockets, close range grenade launcher, and even eye blasts from Superman didn't completely damage their suits.
Thor's hammer/lightning >>>>>>>>>>>> everything you just listed.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning.
No it isn't. Show me Faora being able to hit as hard as this:
If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it.
This isn't a lifting contest.
Faora also has far more durability than Thor
Show me Faora surviving an explosion like this:
who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
By an asgardian blade designed to stab asgardians. Here's what an infinitely weaker asgardian does to a knife:
Both are results of Mjolnir's ability, not Thor's. Show me where he does any of that without it.
You're laboring under the impression that Thor will be fast enough to tag Faora; that gif of Thor striking the city is especially heinous, considering how much time he needed to perform it. It's not a lifting contest, no, but Faora has far more raw strength than MCU Thor.
The fact of the matter is that Thor's durability isn't up to par with Faora's, who managed to tank missiles and bullets easily. Not only has Thor never demonstrated any of that, but all of his greater powers depend solely on Mjolnir. None of those gifs you posted contribute much because Thor still fights at the same speeds as any trained human. Faora is significantly faster, and lacks Kryptonian durability. Bending a knife is hardly impressive, considering that 1) he caught the blade, and 2) MCU Asgardians besides the royal family have never been shown as anything greater than human.
I mean, 50 caliber machine gun bullets, military grade rockets, close range grenade launcher, and even eye blasts from Superman didn't completely damage their suits.
Thor's hammer/lightning >>>>>>>>>>>> everything you just listed.
Well they wouldn't be going into this with battle damage :P It'd be a clean start.
Also, that scene with Malekith, the streets and windows of buildings get blown out but Malekith blocks that with extreme ease, yes, I know, the power of the ether was there but I am making the point of it not being as amazing as you say it is.
Remember, the other 4 warriors are there two, there presence may not be entirely helpful to Thor but could they be a hinder?
I wrote out 5 v 1 to give people legitimate chances on both sides for power and strategy.
Could Faora use the Warriors Three as hostages? Could Thor use them to slow her down and strike her?
Both are results of Mjolnir's ability, not Thor's. Show me where he does any of that without it.
...............................yes............a weapon that Thor has here. That's like saying everything Iron Man can do is because of his armor. He hits harder than Faora with Mjolnir. What does it matter if he has it here?
You're laboring under the impression that Thor will be fast enough to tag Faora
AoE lightning:
Thor striking the city is especially heinous, considering how much time he needed to perform it. It's not a lifting contest
I posted the city explosion as a DURABILITY feat. Surviving an explosion that destroyed an entire city>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything Faora has tanked.
It's not a lifting contest, no, but Faora has far more raw strength than MCU Thor.
Thor hit's harder than Faora with Mjolnir, is more durable, and has powerful AoE energy projection.
The fact of the matter is that Thor's durability isn't up to par with Faora's, who managed to tank missiles and bullets easily. Not only has Thor never demonstrated any of that, but
Again........show me Faora surviving an explosion like this:
all of his greater powers depend solely on Mjolnir.
Thor uses Mjolnir. So....do you have a point @mrunsmiley That is like saying "Well Iron Man can only fly with his suit." Durp. Stark comes with a suit. In this thread? Thor has Mjolnir. Use some common sense.
As for Faora, she has shown limited superspeed. She hasn't shown the ability to sustain it, to turn corners at high speeds, nothing but straight line blitzes. Thor'll hit her at some point. And like the missle that put her on her ass, she'll find herself in nighty-night land.
Also, that scene with Malekith, the streets and windows of buildings get blown out but Malekith blocks that with extreme ease, yes, I know, the power of the ether was there but I am making the point of it not being as amazing as you say it is.
The point is it's better than any striking feat Faora has.
Remember, the other 4 warriors are there two, there presence may not be entirely helpful to Thor but could they be a hinder?
I wrote out 5 v 1 to give people legitimate chances on both sides for power and strategy.
Could Faora use the Warriors Three as hostages? Could Thor use them to slow her down and strike her?
Honestly, they could be both a detriment and a distraction. However, If any of the other Asgardians die/are injured, I see Thor being pissed and would go all out on Faora.
Both are results of Mjolnir's ability, not Thor's. Show me where he does any of that without it.
...............................yes............a weapon that Thor has here. That's like saying everything Iron Man can do is because of his armor. He hits harder than Faora with Mjolnir. What does it matter if he has it here?
You're laboring under the impression that Thor will be fast enough to tag Faora
AoE lightning:
Thor striking the city is especially heinous, considering how much time he needed to perform it. It's not a lifting contest
I posted the city explosion as a DURABILITY feat. Surviving an explosion that destroyed an entire city>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything Faora has tanked.
It's not a lifting contest, no, but Faora has far more raw strength than MCU Thor.
Thor hit's harder than with Mjolnir, is more durability, and has powerful AoE energy projection.
The fact of the matter is that Thor's durability isn't up to par with Faora's, who managed to tank missiles and bullets easily. Not only has Thor never demonstrated any of that, but
Again........show me Faora surviving an explosion like this:
all of his greater powers depend solely on Mjolnir.
Which he can call to him anytime he wants.
Thor CREATED the explosion, of course he's going to not be harmed by it. He was on top of the city, with a hammer that could let him fly. Why you think that's a durability feat is beyond me.
The fact of the matter is that Thor himself isn't as powerful or durable as Faora. Why do I say that's important? Because someone who moves at Faora's speed isn't going to get tagged by someone who moves as slow as Thor. You can post all the destruction feats you want, it won't matter if Thor can't hit her. Meanwhile, unless Thor tags Faora with a series of incredibly vicious attacks while somehow miraculously avoiding her high-speed assault, he won't cause her any damage whatsoever.
In addition, if she's in danger of a radial attack, she can easily leap far out of Thor's range if need be.
I get the sense that Thor isnt much of a threat unless he has a weapon.
He isn't. People keep thinking that he poses a threat to someone as fast as Faora. Thor has no durability feats, and was seriously injured by a knife wound. Someone with as much striking power as Faora would put him down easily.
Also, that scene with Malekith, the streets and windows of buildings get blown out but Malekith blocks that with extreme ease, yes, I know, the power of the ether was there but I am making the point of it not being as amazing as you say it is.
The point is it's better than any striking feat Faora has.
Remember, the other 4 warriors are there two, there presence may not be entirely helpful to Thor but could they be a hinder?
I wrote out 5 v 1 to give people legitimate chances on both sides for power and strategy.
Could Faora use the Warriors Three as hostages? Could Thor use them to slow her down and strike her?
Honestly, they could be both a detriment and a detraction. However, If any of the other Asgardians die/are injured, I see Thor being pissed and would go all out on Faora.
At least now you're considering them all.
So to consider; Sif carries a sword, Faora takes said sword from her and is able to stab Thor and kill him.
Reverse, Faora attempts to kill Thor first as he is the obvious biggest threat and ignores the Warriors Three who use that advantage to damage her suit and weaken (or at least limit her movement).
Thor CREATED the explosion, of course he's going to not be harmed by it.
.............actually no....Thor may have caused it but the explosion was from the Vibranium he hit.
He was on top of the city, with a hammer that could let him fly.
He didn't fly away though......He was dead center in the explosion. Unless you're saying Thor can fly so fast he moves faster than a point-blank explosion? In which case Thor would be faster than Faora......
The fact of the matter is that Thor himself isn't as powerful or durable as Faora.
So far I've been the only one posting feats. Thor hits harder (with Mjolnir which he HAS and can call to him at any time), more durable, can fly, and actually has energy projection. Thor is easily more powerful.
Why do I say that's important? Because someone who moves at Faora's speed isn't going to get tagged by someone who moves as slow as Thor. You can post all the destruction feats you want, it won't matter if Thor can't hit her. Meanwhile, unless Thor tags Faora with a series of incredibly vicious attacks while somehow miraculously avoiding her high-speed assault, he won't cause her any damage whatsoever.
AoE:
In addition, if she's in danger of a radial attack, she can easily leap far out of Thor's range if need be.
Also, that scene with Malekith, the streets and windows of buildings get blown out but Malekith blocks that with extreme ease, yes, I know, the power of the ether was there but I am making the point of it not being as amazing as you say it is.
The point is it's better than any striking feat Faora has.
Remember, the other 4 warriors are there two, there presence may not be entirely helpful to Thor but could they be a hinder?
I wrote out 5 v 1 to give people legitimate chances on both sides for power and strategy.
Could Faora use the Warriors Three as hostages? Could Thor use them to slow her down and strike her?
Honestly, they could be both a detriment and a detraction. However, If any of the other Asgardians die/are injured, I see Thor being pissed and would go all out on Faora.
At least now you're considering them all.
So to consider; Sif carries a sword, Faora takes said sword from her and is able to stab Thor and kill him.
Reverse, Faora attempts to kill Thor first as he is the obvious biggest threat and ignores the Warriors Three who use that advantage to damage her suit and weaken (or at least limit her movement).
The latter of scenario is more likely because how would she know Sif's sword can stab Thor? Also, what are Thor and all the other Asgardians doing when she kills Sif and takes her weapon? They wouldn't just stand around and let it happen.
Thor CREATED the explosion, of course he's going to not be harmed by it. He was on top of the city, with a hammer that could let him fly. Why you think that's a durability feat is beyond me.
Do you understand what you're saying here?
The fact of the matter is that Thor himself isn't as powerful or durable as Faora.
Thor is a whole lot more powerful than Faora who is actually just a brick. He's also a whole lot more durable than her.
Why do I say that's important? Because someone who moves at Faora's speed isn't going to get tagged by someone who moves as slow as Thor. You can post all the destruction feats you want, it won't matter if Thor can't hit her. Meanwhile, unless Thor tags Faora with a series of incredibly vicious attacks while somehow miraculously avoiding her high-speed assault, he won't cause her any damage whatsoever.
He doesn't have to tag her with "a series of incredibly vicious attacks", only just a couple of hits and she'd be done. The only thing she has over Thor is speed.
In addition, if she's in danger of a radial attack, she can easily leap far out of Thor's range if need be.
But how would she know? Plus, she's helpless in the air and can get sniped out by Thor's lightning.
Also, that scene with Malekith, the streets and windows of buildings get blown out but Malekith blocks that with extreme ease, yes, I know, the power of the ether was there but I am making the point of it not being as amazing as you say it is.
The point is it's better than any striking feat Faora has.
Remember, the other 4 warriors are there two, there presence may not be entirely helpful to Thor but could they be a hinder?
I wrote out 5 v 1 to give people legitimate chances on both sides for power and strategy.
Could Faora use the Warriors Three as hostages? Could Thor use them to slow her down and strike her?
Honestly, they could be both a detriment and a detraction. However, If any of the other Asgardians die/are injured, I see Thor being pissed and would go all out on Faora.
At least now you're considering them all.
So to consider; Sif carries a sword, Faora takes said sword from her and is able to stab Thor and kill him.
Reverse, Faora attempts to kill Thor first as he is the obvious biggest threat and ignores the Warriors Three who use that advantage to damage her suit and weaken (or at least limit her movement).
The latter of scenario is more likely because how would she know Sif's sword can stab Thor? Also, what are Thor and all the other Asgardians doing when she kills Sif and takes her weapon? They wouldn't just stand around and let it happen.
Well she wouldn't know it wouldn't kill him either, what reason would she have to doubt the weapon?
True, although if they are as useless as most seem to think then dispatching the warriors three with great speed would be no task at all, considering she removed ten soldiers from their positions in the speed it takes to blink.
The team easily, and a bit of overkill. Thor is enough to take her, if his last few feats in the latest MCU Marvel arent enough to prove that hes more powerful then Faora nothing will.
Thor CREATED the explosion, of course he's going to not be harmed by it. He was on top of the city, with a hammer that could let him fly. Why you think that's a durability feat is beyond me.
Do you understand what you're saying here?
Do you?
The fact of the matter is that Thor himself isn't as powerful or durable as Faora.
Thor is a whole lot more powerful than Faora who is actually just a brick. He's also a whole lot more durable than her.
Show me Thor tanking a missile or a hail of bullets. Show me Faora being wounded by a knife. He has nothing on her when it comes to durability.
Why do I say that's important? Because someone who moves at Faora's speed isn't going to get tagged by someone who moves as slow as Thor. You can post all the destruction feats you want, it won't matter if Thor can't hit her. Meanwhile, unless Thor tags Faora with a series of incredibly vicious attacks while somehow miraculously avoiding her high-speed assault, he won't cause her any damage whatsoever.
He doesn't have to tag her with "a series of incredibly vicious attacks", only just a couple of hits and she'd be done. The only thing she has over Thor is speed.
Yes, he does, actually. The only thing that phased Faora in her entire fight with Superman was her suit being damaged. Kryptonians have never shown damage in combat other than Zod's death. Thor has shown limits, Faora hasn't.
In addition, if she's in danger of a radial attack, she can easily leap far out of Thor's range if need be.
But how would she know? Plus, she's helpless in the air and can get sniped out by Thor's lightning.
She's not helpless, if you've seen how quickly she can move. Show me Thor ever managing to tag someone as quick as Faora.
Faora is faster but Thor is better at literally everything else by feats.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning. If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it. Faora also has far more durability than Thor, who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
Wounded by an Asgardian blade. As we were shown in the Agents of SHIELD episode "The Well" Asgardian knives > Human knives. In all the movies Thor was only ko'd by a city being vaporized, pretty solid durability to me..
Well she wouldn't know it wouldn't kill him either, what reason would she have to doubt the weapon?
Because she has her own blade and would use that instead first?
True, although if they are as useless as most seem to think then dispatching the warriors three with great speed would be no task at all, considering she removed ten soldiers from their positions in the speed it takes to blink.
She didn't take out those soldiers as fast as you claim; it took several seconds, I counted. Thor would have more aggro than any of the warriors also.
Faora is faster but Thor is better at literally everything else by feats.
Thor's only advantages over Faora are flight and lightning. If he has her lifting strength, he hasn't shown it. Faora also has far more durability than Thor, who was wounded by a small blade in Avengers.
Wounded by an Asgardian blade. As we were shown in the Agents of SHIELD episode "The Well" Asgardian knives > Human knives. In all the movies Thor was only ko'd by a city being vaporized, pretty solid durability to me..
Then she takes a weapon from one of the Warriors Three that she kills, and murders Thor with it. Simple matter.
Then she takes a weapon from one of the Warriors Three that she kills, and murders Thor with it. Simple matter.
Why try to use those blades when she has her own?
If, as you and uugie are implying, Thor is durable enough to withstand puncture wounds from regular knives, she may as well resort to her own. Given how Kryptonians are more a more advanced race than Asgardians, it may be that Faora's knife is able to wound Thor, but it hasn't shown anything special. The fact remains that the option remains open to her.
Then she takes a weapon from one of the Warriors Three that she kills, and murders Thor with it. Simple matter.
Why try to use those blades when she has her own?
If, as you and uugie are implying, Thor is durable enough to withstand puncture wounds from regular knives, she may as well resort to her own. Given how Kryptonians are more a more advanced race than Asgardians, it may be that Faora's knife is able to wound Thor, but it hasn't shown anything special. The fact remains that the option remains open to her.
What proof do you have that Krytptonians are move advanced? lol.
If, as you and uugie are implying, Thor is durable enough to withstand puncture wounds from regular knives, she may as well resort to her own. Given how Kryptonians are more a more advanced race than Asgardians, it may be that Faora's knife is able to wound Thor, but it hasn't shown anything special. The fact remains that the option remains open to her.
She never used her knife in combat.........not even once. My point is, if she's going to use a blade, it'd be her own. It also has no feats to suggest it is sharper than a regular knife. Being made of more durable material =/= sharper.
Log in to comment