I can see Thor taking this with very high difficulty. On Asgard she was having trouble with an unarmed Thor, without Asgard's power I don't see her taking a majority over Thor with Stormbreaker and Mjolnir.
@namebk: How would she stomp this version of Thor in seconds when she couldn't even stomp unarmed Thor in seconds?
You mean the Thor and Valkyrie she was letting get up on the bifrost bridge? They both had weapons that could kill her they just couldn't tag her. You don't need a stormbreaker to kill Hela seeing as she was stabbed by regular Asgardians weapons. Asgardian tech seems to be very effective against her.
She wouldn't dodge these attacks if they weren't a threat.
@namebk: Those weapons can't be compared to Stormbreaker and Mjolnir, and even with regular Asgardian weapons Thor wasn't getting stomped in seconds. Endgame Thor may not be in his prime, but he would still beat the Thor that fought Hela, assuming the other Thor wasn't allowed to take his weapons from him.
@namebk: Those weapons can't be compared to Stormbreaker and Mjolnir, and even with regular Asgardian weapons Thor wasn't getting stomped in seconds. Endgame Thor may not be in his prime, but he would still beat the Thor that fought Hela, assuming the other Thor wasn't allowed to take his weapons from him.
You said he was unarmed as in he had no way to kill her which wasn't true. Those swords he had would kill her if he managed to land his strikes but he was unable to. Him having stormbreaker when he isn't in his prime is going to change what exactly when he cant tag her? EG Thor doesn't use any abilities and Worthy Cap did much better than him. So you're saying she is going to lose to a Thor that doesn't use any abilities and past his prime just because he has stormbreaker? This doesn't make any sense.
@namebk: It’s not just about the weapons capability to damage. Stormbreaker and Mjolnir amp Thor’s power. If all Stormbreaker did was allow Thor to cut Thanos there would be no reason for Thor to think he ever had a chance against Thanos because of it.
Worthy Cap did so good against Thanos due to his insane skill and combos with the shield and hammer. He wasn’t really able to damage Thanos, just annoy him. Thor accidentally oneshot current Ironman as well, which is extremely impressive considering that Ironman should be stronger than IW Ironman, who survived a large piece of moon falling on him.
@namebk: It’s not just about the weapons capability to damage. Stormbreaker and Mjolnir amp Thor’s power. If all Stormbreaker did was allow Thor to cut Thanos there would be no reason for Thor to think he ever had a chance against Thanos because of it.
Worthy Cap did so good against Thanos due to his insane skill and combos with the shield and hammer. He wasn’t really able to damage Thanos, just annoy him. Thor accidentally oneshot current Ironman as well, which is extremely impressive considering that Ironman should be stronger than IW Ironman, who survived a large piece of moon falling on him.
Proof of amp? Wouldn't this be a contradiction to the God of Hammers statement and Ragnarok?
@namebk: Wasn't the statement in Ragnarok more along the lines that the hammer wasn't the source of his power? Because being the source and amping are two entirely different things.
It seems like it made him stronger in some regards, as I can't see Thor without Stormbreaker doing this. It also seems to give him the ability to fly.
And Stormbreaker went through a blast from the complete infinity gauntlet, so I don't see how Hela would stop it.
@namebk: Wasn't the statement in Ragnarok more along the lines that the hammer wasn't the source of his power? Because being the source and amping are two entirely different things.
It seems like it made him stronger in some regards, as I can't see Thor without Stormbreaker doing this. It also seems to give him the ability to fly.
And Stormbreaker went through a blast from the complete infinity gauntlet, so I don't see how Hela would stop it.
He did his best lightning feat without a hammer and was able to one shot the bifrost. Also his lightning in the first avengers movie without stormbreaker was destroying leviathans and other ships around it easily. When he flys into the doorway of the ships at the bottom he could be channeling lightning off of stormbreaker which is something he can do with Mjolnir.
As for the stormbreaker throw she doesn't need to stop it seeing as how slow it traveled and she has reacted to faster things than that like Asgardian bullets and she reacted to Mjolnir in the beginning of the movie. Stormbreaker is also blunt and one side which means it can be caught like Mjolnir. Thanos reacted to stormbreaker and grabbed it by the handle when Thor called it back to him which means it can be stopped if she decides to. Stormbreaker is made from Uru and forged in the same place as Mjolnir so this means it can be broken as well. The last thing he wants to do is let stormbreaker out of his hands against her. Lets not forget that she was blocking Gungnir with her arms in the throneroom without any trouble. He had trouble tagging her with a weapon when he was in his prime and with the help of Valkyrie so I doubt this version of Thor can tag her.
I can see Thor taking this with very high difficulty. On Asgard she was having trouble with an unarmed Thor, without Asgard's power I don't see her taking a majority over Thor with Stormbreaker and Mjolnir.
Hela. She never had trouble with Thor, she was playful until she got tagged and then beat him in literally three moves. Anybody can wield Stormbreaker, Thanos did. I don’t see how she just doesn’t abuse her better physicals (she overpowered both his arms with only one of her own with no effort) and disarm him of stormbreaker and either break it or use it against him. Canonically, she is much more skilled and her stats are much higher in every regard
Hela looks at her brother with disappointment saying look what has become of you destroys Mjolnir again disarms him of Stormbreaker and kills him with it
Log in to comment