DCEU Nam-Ek VS MCU Phase 1 Avengers

@xzone: Are you kidding me X, Hulk has no feats stronger than Superman. And thor's feat was an outlier.

@the_tank: Is that you, KalKent?

@lan_fan: Sure, so how do you expect Namek to survive Thor's lightning?

@the_tank: @lan_fan: Lightning's thor >>>> heat vision ( Cyborg can block it )

Faora and Nam-ek get hurt by heat vision and lightning can build damage to CW supergirl she above nam-ek.

Metal suit redirects lighting. It would mostly flow through him to the ground, minimizing the damage. It could break his mask somehow maybe, but if he continued to pressure Thor, he wouldn't even need to deal with the lightning.

Didn't seem to work that way for Thanos

Nam bodies, with Steve, Natasha, Clint and Tony dying in one-hit each, Thor in 3-4, and Hulk in about a dozen.

Avengers. Namek has better speed, but he doesn't abuse it, and Hulk/Thor together could overpower him.

Those days when Nam-Ek is a teambuster.

Thor solos.

Hulk solos.

Phase 1 Thor's lightning is basically featless without supercharging.

@xzone said:

@lan_fan said:

@xzone said:

@lan_fan: Sure, so how do you expect Namek to survive Thor's lightning?

Metal suit redirects lighting. It would mostly flow through him to the ground, minimizing the damage. It could break his mask somehow maybe, but if he continued to pressure Thor, he wouldn't even need to deal with the lightning.

Didn't seem to work that way for Thanos

Thanos was fine though, right? He literally sells everything, even regular punches from Cap or Spider-Man's kick, so it's hard to scale from him properly. I never said this was going to nullify the damage, but it would minimize it.

Malek stomps phase 1 Thor is garbage? Hulk gets wrecked

Namek stomps phase 1 Thor is garbage? Hulk gets wrecked as well he got outmuscled and out brawled by hulk buster then ko’d

Hulk and Thor are still too much for Nam-ek hes going to get beat down eventually.

@kinglouie: If we are talking about MCU Hulk and DCEU Superman, then yes, Hulk has no feats stronger than him.

Is AOU phase one?

If it is, let me present Hulks mach cone punch.

-------------------

On topic.

I don't think AOU is phase 1, I think its phase 2.

Phase 1 Thor solo stomps.

Nam EK dont have flight or energy projection.

He would be helpless against phase 1 Thors tornados.

GG

Thor solos.

@lan_fan:

Thanos was fine though, right? He literally sells everything, even regular punches from Cap or Spider-Man's kick, so it's hard to scale from him properly.

Why would Thanos need to be ok? He has far more impressive durability feats than Nam-ek

I never said this was going to nullify the damage, but it would minimize it.

You said most of the damage would flow to the ground, and I showed you that clearly won't work. It didn't work like that on Thanos, Ultron, or Iron-man, so to suggest it would work that way only on Nam-ek is simply incorrect

Besides, the burden of proof is on you to explain why that would work

Against something like this

@death4bunnies: AOU is phase 2 and that that’s not a Mach cone you literally screenshot it at the time they made a shockwave which only bust cars window.

Superman man actually had a Mach cone and his clashes with zod destroyed an entire building and concrete the same Superman who threw a flurry of punches at Nam-ek face who tanked those with 0 to no damage.

Thor tornado is useless takes to long to charge and Nam-ek has caught far superior flyers than thor out the sky (Fighter jet, Superman) both have much much better maneuverability in the air than Thor he gets snatched up and beat down. Also this Thor was bleeding by a backhand from the hulk on the hellcarrier namek breaks his face.

Lightning is only an issue if it’s super charged because ironman tanked a basic lighting spam from Thor in phase one that didn’t do a single thing to his suite.

Hulk solos, he is stronger and more durable by feats.

Iron Man probably solos with repulsors and Thor one-shots via lightning.

@xzone:

Why would Thanos need to be ok? He has far more impressive durability feats than Nam-ek

Because it wouldn't matter otherwise. I don't even agree that Thanos is much superior to Nam-Ek, but I don't think "hurting Thanos" is relevant to any scaling as the dude literally sells everything despite how strong and durable he is.

You said most of the damage would flow to the ground, and I showed you that clearly won't work.

What did you show? This doesn't prove either of our points, really. If there was a comparison of Thor doing it to Thanos who was not carrying metal, then it would make sense, but we still need to keep in mind that Thanos rarely no sells anything.

We literally see Spider-Man's kicks in IW affecting him as much as Captain Marvel's punches in Endgame. Like, come on.

It didn't work like that on Thanos, Ultron, or Iron-man, so to suggest it would work that way only on Nam-ek is simply incorrect

Besides, the burden of proof is on you to explain why that would work

Logic says otherwise. I'm gonna quote MLF's post here.

"Metal is a conductor, which means it holds very little resistance. In other-words, electricity flows through it far too quickly and easily for heat to properly transfer into the metal (at least not to the extreme degrees the lightning itself is capable of).

Hence why, real life lightning does not melt steel beams, despite it's high temperatures. In fact, we protect buildings by sticking thin metal rods on top of them, and ensuring that there is a direct line to the ground for the current to travel through.

We saw this happen when Thor blasted Ironman, where we were able to visibly see the lightning move through the outside of the armor and into the ground (as well as get absorbed into Ironman's reactor), all without effecting him inside the suit."

I mean, I'd be happy to admit that Thor's lightning carries heat without meeting resistance (like normal fictional energy beam, instead of natural lightning), but that is scientifically false. If it doesn't follow IRL logic in general, then why are we assuming that his lightning is as fast as real life lightning? This is a double edged sword you have to deal with.

@lan_fan: We aren't going to be able to agree if you think Nam-ek is close to Thanos in durability

The durability difference is unbelievable, and that's ignoring the mask overloading problem

Thor and Hulk duo.

@xzone: I don't think it matters in our discussion, I was just saying.

Hulk solos, Thor solos and Iron Man solos.

If anybody wants i wanna CAV this.

@chaoselement: I don't think Iron Man could solo but Thor and Hulk definitely can.

Agreed.

@chaoselement: I will. I love doing DCEU and MCU battles.

Ok, you wanna CAV?

Nam-Ek vs Hulk what do you think?

@chaoselement:

Well if we're going to CaV, I guess I will argue for Nam-Ek and you can argue for Hulk

Cause his armor seemed very weak during the Chitauri battle

He can do some damage.

Nice. Ill set it up now.

I did PM you about some rules.

But he can't kill. Nam-Ek's armor is more durable than Iron Man's. But, Iron Man can fly and he can't.

Yes, but Iron Man can destroy tanks and damage Thor so I think he can damage Nam-Ek.

Hulk, Thor solo low difficulty.

Toss up vs Ironman.

Others are irrelevant anyway.

Nam ek takes

Namek will kill Thor and smash hulk then he'll fuck Black Widow

@sheriff_america: in his dreams probably

@sheriff_america: flagged for language and troll harder.

@sufferedtoker: why do you bump every Avengers vs DCEU thread. What is wrong with you?

Namek should win with difficulty.