@crunch5481:
1) Yeah we do actually. It's in the movie. Electricity makes heat through resistance of the medium, air has a VERY high resistance and so very high heat. Lightning is only so hot in the air. Tony's suit is metal. Metal (especially gold) is VERY LOW resistance and so the heat would be much much less in the metal and yet it still did leave scars on the suit.
1. Can you show me when was it in a move said to be less than 2000 degrees and even then that would only show that suit was weaker, one of his suits got destroyed by truck so that is no surprise but that is irelvant since his other suits are much stronger than that, by your logic if one armor got damaged by Cap all of them would since material is same, yeah armor can tank Thor hiting it with Mjolnir without scratch but since Cap damaged it in civil war that means Cap can do same to IW/ Endgame armor since it is same metal right? That logic is just wrong, one armor is much more durable than other
2. Again it was sustained for multiple secodns which is why that example fails and Thor's lightning is far above natural one in energy and power, if natural lightning was sustained for multiple seconds it would destroy any metal but it only lasts for a very short time which is why that heat is not applied
2) No not really, the IW suit just has the ability to regen. Point is irrelevant anyways as the strength of a material does not necessarily correlate to a higher melting point.
1. It is made of nanotech, it can form many kinds of weapons, regen is not all it can do and most importnatly it is much more durable than previous suits
2. It proves that if Tony can make it more durable agisnt blunt force he can do same against heat so your logic that it is as durable as a suit that got destroyed by truck or MCU Cap fails
3) Fiction yes. Much more durable than any metal on Earth probably, still see point above.
I did but like I said it is much more durable than any metal on earth that is why that nothing on earth can tank 6000 degrees logic fails
4) Proves nothing. The power of the power stone varies. That blast was mostly concussive force we have not seen the power stone melt anything -> no apparent heat. That wasn't a burn to Thor's face lol.
1. Agian this is difirnet since he used beam here, the same beam was used to destroy an entire fleet of ships which is what Tony tanked
2. I am pretty sure that was burning, it burned him, so yeah
Wow, Thor can no-sell his own powers? Impressive. Means nothing.
Because you do not like it? He can do that because of his durabiltiy since he is God of Thunder his resistance agisnt lightning was much higher than other Asgardians, Storm was knocked out and nearly killed by her own lightning as well, that HeRP DeRp It Is HeR PoWr did not save her, Superman can still hurt himslef with his own punches, just because it is his power does not mean he is magically immune to it, that was never said in move
Really? Still sticking with that line? "Full Force of a Star" has been debunked more times than I count.
No, it was not, some slaty DCEU Fans did try that more than i can count yes that is right but you cannot debunk move itself, what Eitri says shows writers intnetion and is far more important than your or mine opinion, he tanked full force of neutron star, like Raj posted even surface temperature can be 1 milion kelvins and that is not what Thor tanked, he tanked full force of it, all of its energy and heat concentrated in the single beam and he tanked it for 40 seconds, so yeah suggesting that weak HV which -melted concrete and steel is somehow going to do anything to Thor is beyond silly
Log in to comment