DCEU Aquaman vs MCU Airport team

Fight takes place near the surface of a beach.

Airport team consists of:

Iron Man(IW)

War Machine

Cap(IW)

Winter Soldier

Falcon

Spider-Man

Black Panther

Black Widow

Hawkeye

Standard gear for all fighters. Aquaman has the Trident of Atlantis.

Who wins?

Rhodes can take this, the rest die

Iron duo ftw. Rest are fodder.

Tony or Rhodes could solo

Rhodes solos.

@kinglouie: He's completely bulletproof, and can't be pierced by regular metal sword. His skin is solid hard.

OT: Also, Aquaman could potentially get overwhelmed by Iron Man. None of them should be able to survive his trident though.

Edit: Takes place in a beach? Aquaman wins.

Didn't the Director state that he can be pierced by Firearms?

Can't Spider Man solo this?

The question here is how much of the fight will take place in the water, where I guess only Iron Man can fight (War Machine, with his conventional arsenal, won't be useful). But Iron is indeed a match for Aquaman in any way or form: He would lose in the water, and win out of it.

Out of the water, there's like 4 characters on the Avengers side that can give him a viable one on one.

Arthur was lifting 1000 ton subs like it was no big deal. He stomps.

Either Black Panther, Iron Man, War Machine or Spiderman can solo, maybe Wanda too depending on starting distance, others are fodder.

Didn't see the movie yet, so i am relying only on what i have heard. Did Aquaman get hurt by a grenade launcher? Bleeding? Broken Bones? Bruises? Or did he just get staggered?

No. he crushes BP and Spiderman without a chance for a debate.

@chimeroid: Just like he crushed Black Mata??? or that Soldier who knocked him out??? both T'challa and Peter beat him decisively

U do remember that even the prototype of BM's laser was able to bust giant rock which is beyond Ironman's energy capabilities.

& At best BP can scratch his skin that was barely phased by bullet.

Iron Man solos. Ant Man solos. War Machine solos. Wanda Solos. Vision Solos.

Tony or Rhodey solo, Rhodey would stomp if he’s in his IW suit too. T’Challa and Peter could also put up amazing fights.

The airport team wins.

As i said, i didn't watch the movie yet. But Aquaman's feats against Steppenwolf and the Sub feat make him way too strong for Spiderman or T'Challa. T'Challa was rocked by a Rhino. Arthur is at least 10,000 times stronger than that. He could potentially oneshot BP through BP's suit and he would definitely one-shot Peter.

The bolded part seems like Low-balling. I mean, if i made a case that IM was a Cap-level character due to the ending of Civil War, you would vote to have me hanged for the low-ball. Aquaman still has a plethora of awesome durability feats you can't just chuck away due to a fight with manta.

Regarding feats of claws - Arthur's armor took a blow from Steppenwolf's axe, a weapon far more formidable (even in cutting power) than T'Challa's claws. Arthur no-sells.

No. Arthur would lose to BP and Spiderman.

FYI the submarine Arthur lifted was nuclear so it's between 30,000 to 48,000 tons.

Did he lift it underwater?

Why does it matter?

Because if he lifted it underwater than the feat doesn't matter.

Why?

He crushes the street levelers. Loses the IW Iron Man.

Because water takes almost all the weight away from an object.

Then go & lift titanic out of water.

I'm happy to discredit you.

Classic troll move.

Iron man solos

War machine solos

Falcon solos

Really? Do you really think that? Are you in any way, shape or form being serious? I can't even begin to explain why your sentence is wrong.

Any way, during the feat, the submarine was outside of the water for well over 10 feet. Making it a fully legitimate feat of lifting something without the "assistance" of water.

It's physics, and we can still discredit it as a legitimate feat because the water allowed him to build the momentum he needed to push it into the air.

I'll come back to you once i watch the film. (currently snowed in, so i can't go to the cinema).

It's bullshit.

Physics and reported.

#ignored.

I fully know it's physics. But you are painfully wrong.

1. Water doesn't remove all the weight. It removes 1 ton per cubic meter due to it's density. Also, it's not weight it removes, but it is the amount of weight it can support as you lift something. I mean, it's a lot more complicated than this explanation, but i don't think you would get the more detailed guide.

2. Water adds resistance. Yes, it's easier to slowly lift something through water, but moving anything through water with speed is 8 times more difficult than through air.

3. Aquaman was moving incredibly quickly and, at the end, the submarine broke the surface and moved out in the air. According to your "physics" once the sub was no longer in the water, it was no longeru nder the effect of "becoming weightless".

Seriously, go study physics before you spout nonsense like that.

@cahddz:Oh, and if you edit posts to add more shit in, please put a note that says "Edit:" Before you continue writing. It's really distasteful that you added "counters' into existing posts.

Also, water wouldn't help him build momentum. he wasn't pushing out a beach ball, he was pushing a submarine with negative buoyancy. But, i feel like explaining buoyancy to you might be a waste of time.

No thanks. The water allowed him to build the momentum he needed to push it into the air.

Please, do explain how water would help him build momentum for a submarine that had negative buoyancy at near-surface levels.

Lifting is easier when the object is submerged in water.

@cahddz: Are you trolling me or are you just illiterate? did you read my previous posts? realistically, water would remove up to 30% of the Sub's weight. But, moving it quickly through water would return around 560% of that weightback to Aquaman's shoulders. Stay in school kid. I will be blocking you, not that it would matter since you won't be staying on the Vine for long anyway.