@greysentinel365:
A) Unless you have a window into his head you have no idea what George meant by that line.
Now here's a guess: he meant what he wrote.
At the time where his ideas where nowhere near as well shaped or formed and had to worry a lot more about everything else
But every. Single. Interview and source of Lucas has made it clear what he thought of that fight. It an old man and a cripple.
You're just needlessly regurgitating acknowledged statements when you should be focused on the point of dissent.
If you have anything to contradict this feel free.
The movie is a good start.
Movies are not always what a director intends have you heard of the director's cut?
But it seems like your trying to argue with the ultimate authority of SW for no the hell reason other than your own interpretation.
Needless jabs are needless jabs. Try and stay focused here.
B) Vader is not so much delusional as he is boasting. Ultimately it's ambiguous.
And by "ambiguous", you mean Vader states that he has been awaiting another confrontation with Obi-Wan and is more formidable than ever. Yes, very ambiguous. And if Vader believes himself decisively superior to his former self when in fact he is vastly inferior, yes that would make him hilariously delusional.
Also keep in mind that Obi-wan was the one who left him not once did Vader leave him. At least Obi-wan was not aware of it until later plus Vader has not fought like his younger self for decades at that point compared to 3 small years of Anakin in his hayday and probably won't remember things properly not to mention Sith are inherently arrogant.
But thankfully Lucas has clarified for us.
Just like he "clarified" that Yoda was in reality a real Jedi, and that Padme died in childbirth. Ah, no, my bad, he changed his mind, as he is known for.
When did he say that? Also pretty sure he mentioned in the movies and interviews consistently Padme died in childbirth
And his OT views supersede his prequel ones because?
@lord_tenebrous said:
One was committed to film, the other was not.
You do realize George had a lot more to worry about then just the film and was not completely in charge right? Much of the dialogue was changed too
This is just your subjective take on one line Vader is throwing out as trash talk in a fight.
"Trash talk"
Vader states that he has been preparing for a second encounter with Obi-Wan for a long time and is better than ever.
He openly suggest that he is the master while Obi-wan is the learner sure not trash talk
1. Prove Lucas meant it that way
Him writing it that way is a good indicator.
Yes but he changed his mind and the films changed if we went 1977 George Lucas we would have a generic villain known as Darth Vader for 3 movies
2. Prove why that would outweigh every single other time Lucas has clarified that Vader is and has always been a crippled half-machine far weaker than Anakin.
Intent that went into the film would clearly trump intent that was not present in the film as the films overrule even Lucas.
Yeah and the intent with Vader was never to be Anakin or how about the deleted scenes there? Not to mention there is far more things suggesting Vader is weaker in universe with just the movies. Remember when Palpatine said he would have more powerful apprentice and could be more powerful than he or Yoda? Guess what happens? Oh yeah Vader is weaker than both of them to the point that his barely trained son could beat him with a little anger
We have Lucas, setting up for the climatic showdown between the old mentor and the big villain, who have a history, writing Vader as talking about how he's been waiting for this rematch a long time and is decisively stronger than before. Clear as day signaling that Vader is as good as ever, conveying facts through dialogue.
Yes even still we also know Vader is suppose to be far stronger than anyone in the universe but he is not unless you can prove Vader is somehow stronger than both Yoda and Palpatine he got weaker end of story.
But no, to the contrary of the film dialogue, Vader is in fact vastly past his prime and thus we are being mislead by a delusional Vader who is written as delusional by Lucas because he who is known for altering his ideas after committing them to film said many years later that Vader wasn't nearly as good then as he was during the movies that didn't exist yet.
Yes well Vader is clearly stated to have murdered Luke's father oh wait a minute -_-
Or Leia was never force sensitive oh wait a minute -_-
Or Leia was never related to Luke and Vader oh wait a minute -_-
Not all things in film are necessarily what the director intended for example Luke's sister was cut out of ROTJ due to Lucas not having enough time for that story arc plus budgeting issues. Lucas changes the story throughout the OT how is that not one of them?
Log in to comment