This is what would hppend to Gambit if he fought Cyrax! "
even though i agree cyrax would kill, thats not him in the clip cyrax can teleport has an energy net, bombs, saw blades and if it gets really bad he can pul the predator move and self-destruct
" He could do Daredevil, Captain America and Spiderman in a one on one fight. "
Are you attention whoring.You make these outlandish claims in like every thread. "
Glad someone else noticed. Mini Mouse could and would rape Cyrax. Gambit is just overkill :) "
Read my last post. Gambit would get Manghandled in this fihgt. Hes not a good h2h fighter compared to Cyrax and his abilites would do nothing considering Cyrax could just shoot his acid net and be done with him.
" He could do Daredevil, Captain America and Spiderman in a one on one fight. "
Are you attention whoring.You make these outlandish claims in like every thread. "
No, I jus noticed you in this thread so I said something like this to get a response. Hinting that I would debate this fact against you. "
That would be silly because this is clearly an attention whore post.I know Cyrax can't beat any of them or Gambit so I would just be wasting my time. "
Well to you and only you thats attention whoring. Why don't you prove that he cna't beat anyone of them? I bet you would even say that Bats could beat Subzero in a easy win as well huh?
Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll out :)
Well to you and only you thats attention whoring. Why don't you prove that he cna't beat anyone of them? I bet you would even say that Bats could beat Subzero in a easy win as well huh? "
Vance Astro doesn't have to attention whore..I'm Vance Astro.
Well to you and only you thats attention whoring. Why don't you prove that he cna't beat anyone of them? I bet you would even say that Bats could beat Subzero in a easy win as well huh? "
Vance Astro doesn't have to attention whore..I'm Vance Astro. "
Well to you and only you thats attention whoring. Why don't you prove that he cna't beat anyone of them? I bet you would even say that Bats could beat Subzero in a easy win as well huh? "
Vance Astro doesn't have to attention whore..I'm Vance Astro. "
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh?
Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah!
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Who the hell do you think you're talking to when it comes to Gambit?
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Hahaha you ask for proof yet supply none. Care to prove that Cyrax's h2h is far superior.........I mean you dont even try. Its like playing cards with my sisters kids or some'n. What exactly would his energy blades do? Think about it, as soon as he tried too slice Gambit's cards they'd explode. Dur Dur Dur hahaha
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Hahaha you ask for proof yet supply none. Care to prove that Cyrax's h2h is far superior.........I mean you dont even try. Its like playing cards with my sisters kids or some'n. What exactly would his energy blades do? Think about it, as soon as he tried too slice Gambit's cards they'd explode. Dur Dur Dur hahaha "
you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Who the hell do you think you're talking to when it comes to Gambit?
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Hahaha you ask for proof yet supply none. Care to prove that Cyrax's h2h is far superior.........I mean you dont even try. Its like playing cards with my sisters kids or some'n. What exactly would his energy blades do? Think about it, as soon as he tried too slice Gambit's cards they'd explode. Dur Dur Dur hahaha "
you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
We're not forgetting anything.You're assuming we haven't already considered that.
" you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
Is he faster? Maybe he is, care to share how you came to this conclusion? And as for teleporting Nightcrawler teleports and Gambit has defeated him before. I'd like to see where you two are getting your info on Cryax's skill, speed, strength , etc etc.
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Who the hell do you think you're talking to when it comes to Gambit?
Gambler>>>>>>>>>You.
"
Some peoples kids I tell ya "
Im a grown ass man.
My knowlege on Gambit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Yours
Oh yeah his cards are gonna explode but do nothing...
If Gambit got close he would just shoot out his buzzsaw out of his chest and kill Gambit. It'll happen pretty quick too.
Im a grown ass man. My knowlege on Gambit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>YoursOh yeah his cards are gonna explode but do nothing...If Gambit got close he would just shoot out his buzzsaw out of his chest and kill Gambit. It'll happen pretty quick too. "
Don't pretend you know more about Gambit than me or Gambler if that was directed at him.You quoted him but you post suggests you were talking to me.Either way nobody is fooled.
" you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
Is he faster? Maybe he is, care to share how you came to this conclusion? And as for teleporting Nightcrawler teleports and Gambit has defeated him before. I'd like to see where you two are getting your info on Cryax's skill, speed, strength , etc etc. "
Yeah but the fact is he doesn't know that Cyrax can teleport. Your acting like hes an expert against teleporters.
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Who the hell do you think you're talking to when it comes to Gambit?
Gambler>>>>>>>>>You.
"
Some peoples kids I tell ya "
Im a grown ass man. My knowlege on Gambit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>YoursOh yeah his cards are gonna explode but do nothing...If Gambit got close he would just shoot out his buzzsaw out of his chest and kill Gambit. It'll happen pretty quick too. "
So...Gambit's cards won't do anything....But a punch from any of the MK characters will? Or a low level fireball attack from Lui Kang? Where do you make this bold assumption that Cyrax has this amazing armor that is able to withstand an attack from Gambit? Heck, you wanna base your logic on video games, Gambit does a 52 pick up (Marvel VS Capcom), game over. =)
" you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
Is he faster? Maybe he is, care to share how you came to this conclusion? And as for teleporting Nightcrawler teleports and Gambit has defeated him before. I'd like to see where you two are getting your info on Cryax's skill, speed, strength , etc etc. "
Yeah but the fact is he doesn't know that Cyrax can teleport. Your acting like hes an expert against teleporters. "
You're underestimating Gambit's reflexes.Just because you know someone is going to teleport doesn't mean you know where they are going to be...so Gambit would have the same luck tagging Cyrax as he did with Nightcrawler.
So...Gambit's cards won't do anything....But a punch from any of the MK characters will? Or a low level fireball attack from Lui Kang? Where do you make this bold assumption that Cyrax has this amazing armor that is able to withstand an attack from Gambit? Heck, you wanna base your logic on video games, Gambit does a 52 pick up (Marvel VS Capcom), game over. =) "
It's called Royal Flush..and it's a 52 hit combo :)
Cyrax will already be dead when Gambit catches his staff.
" you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
Is he faster? Maybe he is, care to share how you came to this conclusion? And as for teleporting Nightcrawler teleports and Gambit has defeated him before. I'd like to see where you two are getting your info on Cryax's skill, speed, strength , etc etc. "
Yeah but the fact is he doesn't know that Cyrax can teleport. Your acting like hes an expert against teleporters. "
" you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
Is he faster? Maybe he is, care to share how you came to this conclusion? And as for teleporting Nightcrawler teleports and Gambit has defeated him before. I'd like to see where you two are getting your info on Cryax's skill, speed, strength , etc etc. "
Yeah but the fact is he doesn't know that Cyrax can teleport. Your acting like hes an expert against teleporters. "
You're underestimating Gambit's reflexes.Just because you know someone is going to teleport doesn't mean you know where they are going to be...so Gambit would have the same luck tagging Cyrax as he did with Nightcrawler. "
Gamibt has good reflexes. But when your fighting someone you never fought before your not gonna know what hes gonna do. I mean yeah Nightcrawler is a master of his ability but Gambit knows him already. Cyrax on the other hand is different ball game because you don't know him and if he teleports you don't know where hes gonna be because oyu don;t know hi tendencies like Nightcrawler.
@k4tzm4n said:
"@Lantern Prime said:
"@Gambler said:
"@Vance Astro said:
" @Lantern Prime said:
" @Gambler said:
"Ever heard of facts? Like fact one, Gambit is a master of Savate. So there goes your claim that he's not a good hand to hand fighter. I also dont see what his net would do against kinetically charged cards. Kinetic energy > acid net. Yeah thats what I thought lol. Transform and roll our :) "
I know about his Savate. Who the hell think ur talking to when it comes to Gambit? A noob? But thats not gonna help him in this fight. Cyrax is the superior H2h fighter. Lets see what his card would do to Cyrax's energy blades? Yeah didn't think aobut that huh? Kinetic energy>Acid Net? Ever heard of proving it? Yeah I thought so Wanname ahhahah! "
Who the hell do you think you're talking to when it comes to Gambit?
Gambler>>>>>>>>>You.
"
Some peoples kids I tell ya "
Im a grown ass man. My knowlege on Gambit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>YoursOh yeah his cards are gonna explode but do nothing...If Gambit got close he would just shoot out his buzzsaw out of his chest and kill Gambit. It'll happen pretty quick too. "
So...Gambit's cards won't do anything....But a punch from any of the MK characters will? Or a low level fireball attack from Lui Kang? Where do you make this bold assumption that Cyrax has this amazing armor that is able to withstand an attack from Gambit? Heck, you wanna base your logic on video games, Gambit does a 52 pick up (Marvel VS Capcom), game over. =) "
Yeah his cards wont do as much damage as a firball from Lui Kang. A knockback maybe. Mk fighters get hit with all kinds of attacks.
LMAO....Once again, WHERE are you basing this fact from? By using your logic, a "blade slash" from Cyrax would only take away part of Gambit's health bar ;)
Yeah his cards wont do as much damage as a firball from Lui Kang. A knockback maybe. Mk fighters get hit with all kinds of attacks. "
Cyrax lost in the MK tournament which means he was knocked out by physical attacks,which also makes what your saying about explosions just knocking him back absolutely false.
" you are all forgetting, that not only is Cyrax faster, he can teleport as well, so teleport and one well placed slash Gambits as dead as it gets "
Is he faster? Maybe he is, care to share how you came to this conclusion? And as for teleporting Nightcrawler teleports and Gambit has defeated him before. I'd like to see where you two are getting your info on Cryax's skill, speed, strength , etc etc. "
Yeah but the fact is he doesn't know that Cyrax can teleport. Your acting like hes an expert against teleporters. "
You're underestimating Gambit's reflexes.Just because you know someone is going to teleport doesn't mean you know where they are going to be...so Gambit would have the same luck tagging Cyrax as he did with Nightcrawler. "
Gamibt has good reflexes. But when your fighting someone you never fought before your not gonna know what hes gonna do. I mean yeah Nightcrawler is a master of his ability but Gambit knows him already. Cyrax on the other hand is different ball game because you don't know him and if he teleports you don't know where hes gonna be because oyu don;t know hi tendencies like Nightcrawler.
Just because you know someone still doesn't mean you know where they are going to be.Rouge knew Nightcrawler pretty well and she had trouble tagging him while he was teleporting..and she at the time was actually faster than Gambit because she has Ms.Marvel's reflexes.
Yeah his cards wont do as much damage as a firball from Lui Kang. A knockback maybe. Mk fighters get hit with all kinds of attacks. "
Cyrax lost in the MK tournament which means he was knocked out by physical attacks,which also makes what your saying about explosions just knocking him back absolutely false. "
Yeah it'll damage him but that doens't mean a card is gonna beat him. And who said he didn't get beat by physical force?
@k4tzm4n said:
"LMAO....Once again, WHERE are you basing this fact from? By using your logic, a "blade slash" from Cyrax would only take away part of Gambit's health bar ;) "
Yeah his cards wont do as much damage as a firball from Lui Kang. A knockback maybe. Mk fighters get hit with all kinds of attacks. "
Cyrax lost in the MK tournament which means he was knocked out by physical attacks,which also makes what your saying about explosions just knocking him back absolutely false. "
Yeah it'll damage him but that doens't mean a card is gonna beat him. And who said he didn't get beat by physical force?
If you didn't say he didn't get beat by physical force you should have because it makes you argument less retarded.If you think an explosion won't knock him out but punches did,that's completely illogical...and just plain stupid honestly.
Yeah his cards wont do as much damage as a firball from Lui Kang. A knockback maybe. Mk fighters get hit with all kinds of attacks. "
Cyrax lost in the MK tournament which means he was knocked out by physical attacks,which also makes what your saying about explosions just knocking him back absolutely false. "
Yeah it'll damage him but that doens't mean a card is gonna beat him. And who said he didn't get beat by physical force?
If you didn't say he didn't get beat by physical force you should have because it makes you argument less retarded.If you think an explosion won't knock him out but punches did,that's completely illogical...and just plain stupid honestly. "
????WTF? Didn't I say that he can get knocked backed from a exploding card? WTF ARE TALKING ABOUT? Yor making no kind of sense making claims of what I said.
????WTF? Didn't I say that he can get knocked backed from a exploding card? WTF ARE TALKING ABOUT? Yor making no kind of sense making claims of what I said. "
When you say knocked back you mean not knocked out right? Then what I just said makes perfect sense.Cyrax lost to melee attacks..so to think he will only get "knocked back" by and explosion is retarded.Does that make sense now?
????WTF? Didn't I say that he can get knocked backed from a exploding card? WTF ARE TALKING ABOUT? Yor making no kind of sense making claims of what I said. "
When you say knocked back you mean not knocked out right? Then what I just said makes perfect sense.Cyrax lost to melee attacks..so to think he will only get "knocked back" by and explosion is retarded.Does that make sense now? "
Log in to comment