CW Arrow vs Doc Ock(Raimi)
Obviously Oliver is completely screwed if he allows Ock to get up close. He's really never ever fought anybody anything like Otto before. But at the same time, Oliver has so many options for neutralizing Otto before Otto gets anywhere close enough to reach him, so unless Oliver is jobbing, it has to be him.
Obviously Oliver is completely screwed if he allows Ock to get up close. He's really never ever fought anybody anything like Otto before. But at the same time, Oliver has so many options for neutralizing Otto before Otto gets anywhere close enough to reach him, so unless Oliver is jobbing, it has to be him.
This is ridiculous, Oliver is not beating someone who beat Spiderman.
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
This is ridiculous, Oliver is not beating someone who beat Spiderman.
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
It shows that Doctor Octopus is in a separate tier entirely. Oliver is out of his weight class.
This is ridiculous, Oliver is not beating someone who beat Spiderman.
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
It shows that Doctor Octopus is in a separate tier entirely. Oliver is out of his weight class.
No way. That is ABC logic. You know the old example.
Character A, beats Character B, who beat Character C. So does that mean Character A can automatically beat Character C as well? No, because he might have beaten Character B specifically using fire powers, which Character B is weak to, and Character C is not.
Now let's apply this frame to the battle at hand.
Doc Ock beat Spider-Man, who can beat Green Arrow, so can Doc Ock beat Green Arrow? Not necessarily, Doc Ock beat Spider-Man because Spider-Man is limited in his skillset and played right into Doc Ock's strength. Having four mechanical limbs makes him a powerhouse in CQC, and Spider-Man had no choice but to engage in CQC. But Green Arrow does have a choice. He can use, A) stealth. B) archery. C) trick arrows. D) environmental traps. Doc Ock has never shown what he can do to defend against such tactics.
Sometimes, it's the more adaptable fighter who wins out over the more powerful fighter. And Green Arrow is nothing but adaptable.
This is ridiculous, Oliver is not beating someone who beat Spiderman.
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
It shows that Doctor Octopus is in a separate tier entirely. Oliver is out of his weight class.
No way. That is ABC logic. You know the old example.
Character A, beats Character B, who beat Character C. So does that mean Character A can automatically beat Character C as well? No, because he might have beaten Character B specifically using fire powers, which Character B is weak to, and Character C is not.
Now let's apply this frame to the battle at hand.
Doc Ock beat Spider-Man, who can beat Green Arrow, so can Doc Ock beat Green Arrow? Not necessarily, Doc Ock beat Spider-Man because Spider-Man is limited in his skillset and played right into Doc Ock's strength. Having four mechanical limbs makes him a powerhouse in CQC, and Spider-Man had no choice but to engage in CQC. But Green Arrow does have a choice. He can use, A) stealth. B) archery. C) trick arrows. D) environmental traps. Doc Ock has never shown what he can do to defend against such tactics.
Sometimes, it's the more adaptable fighter who wins out over the more powerful fighter. And Green Arrow is nothing but adaptable.
fine
This is ridiculous, Oliver is not beating someone who beat Spiderman.
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
It shows that Doctor Octopus is in a separate tier entirely. Oliver is out of his weight class.
No way. That is ABC logic. You know the old example.
Character A, beats Character B, who beat Character C. So does that mean Character A can automatically beat Character C as well? No, because he might have beaten Character B specifically using fire powers, which Character B is weak to, and Character C is not.
Now let's apply this frame to the battle at hand.
Doc Ock beat Spider-Man, who can beat Green Arrow, so can Doc Ock beat Green Arrow? Not necessarily, Doc Ock beat Spider-Man because Spider-Man is limited in his skillset and played right into Doc Ock's strength. Having four mechanical limbs makes him a powerhouse in CQC, and Spider-Man had no choice but to engage in CQC. But Green Arrow does have a choice. He can use, A) stealth. B) archery. C) trick arrows. D) environmental traps. Doc Ock has never shown what he can do to defend against such tactics.
Sometimes, it's the more adaptable fighter who wins out over the more powerful fighter. And Green Arrow is nothing but adaptable.
fine
Yeah that's right kid.
This is ridiculous, Oliver is not beating someone who beat Spiderman.
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
It shows that Doctor Octopus is in a separate tier entirely. Oliver is out of his weight class.
No way. That is ABC logic. You know the old example.
Character A, beats Character B, who beat Character C. So does that mean Character A can automatically beat Character C as well? No, because he might have beaten Character B specifically using fire powers, which Character B is weak to, and Character C is not.
Now let's apply this frame to the battle at hand.
Doc Ock beat Spider-Man, who can beat Green Arrow, so can Doc Ock beat Green Arrow? Not necessarily, Doc Ock beat Spider-Man because Spider-Man is limited in his skillset and played right into Doc Ock's strength. Having four mechanical limbs makes him a powerhouse in CQC, and Spider-Man had no choice but to engage in CQC. But Green Arrow does have a choice. He can use, A) stealth. B) archery. C) trick arrows. D) environmental traps. Doc Ock has never shown what he can do to defend against such tactics.
Sometimes, it's the more adaptable fighter who wins out over the more powerful fighter. And Green Arrow is nothing but adaptable.
fine
Yeah that's right kid.
if doc ock can beat spiderman (spiderman can curbstomp green arrow) tell me what chance does green arrow have. doc ock would break his bows then his toss him around like a ragdoll get out of here kid
if doc ock can beat spiderman (spiderman can curbstomp green arrow) tell me what chance does green arrow have. doc ock would break his bows then his toss him around like a ragdoll get out of here kid
ABC logic. Spider-Man and Green Arrow are not the same, they're completely different with completely different skillsets.
Doc Ock stomps. No amount of scaling is going to help Ollie here.
You have it reversed. Ock is the one who needs to rely on scaling from Spider-Man. On his own, he has no feats to show how he'd defend against A) stealth. B) archery. C) trick arrows. D) environmental traps.
@nickzambuto: sorry but wroooooooooooooong
spiderman AND doc ock out class green arrow in literally everything strength speed intelligence fighting style
they arent different they are just a million times better get out of here with your logic
@nickzambuto: sorry but wroooooooooooooong
spiderman AND doc ock out class green arrow in literally everything strength speed intelligence fighting style
they arent different they are just a million times better get out of here with your logic
No way. That is ABC logic. You know the old example.
Character A, beats Character B, who beat Character C. So does that mean Character A can automatically beat Character C as well? No, because he might have beaten Character B specifically using fire powers, which Character B is weak to, and Character C is not.
Now let's apply this frame to the battle at hand.
Doc Ock beat Spider-Man, who can beat Green Arrow, so can Doc Ock beat Green Arrow? Not necessarily, Doc Ock beat Spider-Man because Spider-Man is limited in his skillset and played right into Doc Ock's strength. Having four mechanical limbs makes him a powerhouse in CQC, and Spider-Man had no choice but to engage in CQC. But Green Arrow does have a choice. He can use, A) stealth. B) archery. C) trick arrows. D) environmental traps. Doc Ock has never shown what he can do to defend against such tactics.
Sometimes, it's the more adaptable fighter who wins out over the more powerful fighter. And Green Arrow is nothing but adaptable.
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
@rogueshadow: You and me both pal. You and me both
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Ollie.
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Save the day.
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
arrow beating flash is dumb and you know it they nerfed him to the max
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
arrow beating flash is dumb and you know it they nerfed him to the max
They did nerf Oliver for Barry to stand a chance, but that makes it even more impressive how he still won.
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
arrow beating flash is dumb and you know it they nerfed him to the max
They did nerf Oliver for Barry to stand a chance, but that makes it even more impressive how he still won.
thats not impressive to me besides you said save the day? like how he did this season? or season 1? Lolll
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
arrow beating flash is dumb and you know it they nerfed him to the max
They did nerf Oliver for Barry to stand a chance, but that makes it even more impressive how he still won.
thats not impressive to me besides you said save the day? like how he did this season? or season 1? Lolll
LOL!
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
arrow beating flash is dumb and you know it they nerfed him to the max
They did nerf Oliver for Barry to stand a chance, but that makes it even more impressive how he still won.
thats not impressive to me besides you said save the day? like how he did this season? or season 1? Lolll
LOL!
i rest my case
great debating with you though
@nickzambuto: no you really need to change your perspective on how your viewing this listen carefully
this isnt some pokemon battle like fire and water and grass but if it was it would be fire and ice > grass (green arrow)
but thats not what i said look at their stats. Strength oliver loses to ock speed oliver loses to ock intelligence oliver loses to ock also if spidermans webbing cant work on ock what makes you think trick arrows will. and doc ock would detect arrow in stealth and environment traps
Don't care if arrow is a adaptable fighter he loses badly get over it
Ock wins in strength. That's it. He doesn't win in speed, he didn't keep up with Spider-Man, he had four flexible arms and Spider-Man still outmaneuvered him the majority of the time. Oliver wins in tactics, skill, versatility, adaptability. Basically all the important aspects. But Otto is definitely stronger, that's true.
Intelligence??? what would arrow do if he was in the final scene of spiderman 2
Irrelevant. You two are debating Ock vs Ollie. We're not comparing if either one can duplicate the other's in-movie feats. There are plenty of examples when one character can beat another character but cannot duplicate the beaten character's feats. Also, Ock's intelligence is in science and more specifically, his expertise in nuclear fusion. He's book-smart which doesn't necessarily translate to tactics & strategy on the battlefield. Oliver has shown multiple times he's an expert strategist when it comes to field battles.
But to answer your question, Arrow can find a way to sink the reactor in the end of Spiderman 2 via explosive arrows or some other way. He can improvise and use his surroundings. In the end scene of Spiderman 2, the goal was essentially to make sure the reactor goes in the water. Something Ollie is capable of doing. One example I aforementioned is explosive arrows. Ollie is quite skilled and intelligent and quick when it comes to finding solutions using the environment around him. One example is how he beat Flash simply by using his battlefield intelligence.
arrow beating flash is dumb and you know it they nerfed him to the max
They did nerf Oliver for Barry to stand a chance, but that makes it even more impressive how he still won.
thats not impressive to me besides you said save the day? like how he did this season? or season 1? Lolll
LOL!
i rest my case
great debating with you though
Yeah you too mate! Lol!
@nickzambuto: I don't really know what Oliver could do to beat Ock. His only option is to shoot arrows at him, and I am sure Ock can cover his whole body with his arms.
@nickzambuto: I don't really know what Oliver could do to beat Ock. His only option is to shoot arrows at him, and I am sure Ock can cover his whole body with his arms.
Obviously he can't. His arms aren't anywhere near that thick.
Ock was being shot at by bullets and was just fine and people think that Oliver's arrows are going to do better smh. The wank has gotten disgusting. Ock is fast enough and strong enough to handle Spider-Man and people think a human archer is going to make a difference
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment