Well, in fact, there's really no such thing as "Mustafar Obi-Wan" -- not unless one refers to Obi-Wan Kenobi's emotional hindrance brought about by the unique circumstances of having to battle his practical brother, the corrupted Anakin Skywalker. The only genuinely positive shift in Obi-Wan Kenobi's base abilities that occurs in the short time period Revenge of the Sith comprises, would be immediately following the death of Count Dooku. A mysterious amplification, and the only one. On Mustafar, Skywalker had every ounce of his typical power and skill with him, and then some -- and he held the upper hand for much of the duel thereby. However, he lacked Kenobi's cunning and inner clarity, and thus proved unable to follow through with any advantage. In the end, Kenobi outfoxed the younger man, and that's that.
And in that same continuity, Obi-Wan outmatched Count Dooku even prior to the mysterious amplification. Demonstrated noticeably greater speed and lightsaber prowess. Dooku managed to work around this and dispatch the Jedi Master nevertheless, but that was through Dooku's own considerable cleverness and experience. I imagine the elder Dooku could again outmaneuver Kenobi, as Kenobi outmaneuvered Skywalker, but I'm uncertain. Regardless, in the context of the Revenge of the Sith senior novelization, Kenobi is a quicker, stronger, and more proficient swordsman than Dooku at any point in this story's timeframe.
Using Count Dooku as he is portrayed in the wider old legends EU, he ought to prevail over Kenobi in a tough match. He has every advantage, and this was true even before he joined the Sith, as Kenobi himself essentially conceded.
Clearly, in the films, Count Dooku is just superior. In canon continuity EU, I'm inclined to favour Obi-Wan, as his portrayal relative to Anakin seems to consistently overshadow Dooku's.
Log in to comment