Could MCU Hulk React To A DCEU Wonder Woman Blitz?

@godzilla44: @arthurcurry89: @plotweapon16255:

^ All correct answers. Hulk hasn’t done anything to suggest that he can react to a person who is able to run as fast as bullets can travel.

Nope, they are in different leagues.

for example even Aquaman or Orm has better reflexes like Orm perceiving in slow mode spinning wheel from submarine. Many no speedster or not alien cw characters like Arrow casually avoids Overgirl heatvision or bullets from close distance, same as Diggle. Widow in mcu has same bullet timing feats. Hulk is really underpower character. They prefer to make him cool, sexy, handsome, warm-hearted, big child instead of overpowered and unstopable beast

@sexybayonetta22: I love it when you agree with me.

?

@plotweapon16255: She didn't travel faster than the bullets as the bullet had to travel further than she had to move to block it.

Couple of meters doesn't make that much difference.

It really does, if the bullet travelled 3 times further than Diana, that means that Diana's speed would just be over 305m/s compared to the bullets 917m/s.

Not exactly, Diana & bullets isn't racing at same time .She was reacting to bullets after it traveled very close to her.

@plotweapon16255 said:

@bdelloidgrain2 said:

@subline said:

Yes, he caught an RPG-7 Missile which travels at 300m/s.

This.

But she traveled faster then the bullets that travels 917 m/s to block it.

917 m/s >>> 300 m/s

True. I'm not arguing that the Hulk is as faster (or faster) than Diana. I do think that the Hulk, however, could react to a blitz.

@sexybayonetta22: Just out of curiosity, when did Black Widow bullet time?

It is canon Avengers prelude:

She normally dodges them just like Arrow or Diggle or Aquaman

He shouldn't be able to. Windy sees bullets in slow motion. I believe if she wanted, she could replicate the Quicksilver vs Thor slow motion instance against Hulk. Hulk probably could see/react to her while in slow motion, but he shouldn't be able to stop/counter her in that state.

Just my 2 cents.

@sexybayonetta22: I see. But just so you know, preludes aren’t always the most accurate in regards to the MCU. There is one prelude that recreates the first scene in Infinity War except it shows Thanos using the power stone to beat Hulk rather than his own physical capability. But to be fair, Black Widow doesn’t have any anti-feats that contradict her being a bullet timer. Thank you for showing me!

@ready_4_madness:

First time: Covering someone elses’ body.

Second time: Was running away and got shot from behind.

Main problem about spin-off comicbook series based on live action contradicts a lot. Yeah.

For example in same comicbook MCU Hawkeye is said to have ability to shot 3 arrows in 1.9 seconds. Ok very possible but in movie he doesn't seem to be that fast in aiming etc. Ok i admit in movies his accuracy is god/superhuman but he needs much time and focus to precise

Or some people claims ( from very controversial picture ) that Black Panther can tag bullet and slash it into half ( despite lack of onomatopeis characteristic of slashing, "Klink" means sound of bullet hitting the suit )

Or Ancient One can bfr herself on her own to deep space probably outside galaxy( idk overally has she done this only with her astral form or even with physical body ). She even admits ring can take you ANYWHERE but they were trapped on Titan and even Strange shown he cannot travel across planets, star systems, galaxies.

so question is what is more convincing etc. : live action feats or comicbook based on live action movie/tv series feats

@sexybayonetta22: I don’t necessarily think that you were wrong about the Black Widow feat, but my opinion is that live action feats are always more accurate to the character’s ability than anything else.

i agree

React? Probably. Tag her? Not likely. He could not touch Blonsky and Thor could consistently outmanuevered him. Neither are anywhere close to Diana in speed and agility.

What people seem to forget when it comes to reaction feats is the thing that the person is reacting to. Bullets, energy blasts and most projectiles in general have relatively predictable trajectories and relatively constant velocities. A person can stop, start, change direction, accelerate and decelerate at any time.

A perfect example of this is in Justice League. When Kal-El first takes a swing at Flash he misses because Flash sees the punch coming and ducks out of the way. If Flash's head was a missile or bullet for any other projectile without sentient thought Kal-El would have connected.

@ready_4_madness: ?

@mister_surreal: I admit it is very HARD sometimes to show in live action movie some super godly impressive feats such as busting mountain or crushing ground because it cost a lot to prepare in purpose of special effects. But in animations and comicbooks it is much easier to show.

But on other hand let see at CW Oliver Queen feats ( only live action, no Vixen and Freedom Fighters animated movie or spin off comics ). He survived fall from Nanda Parbat from Kushu mountains ( probably 300 meters of high ), while fatally stabbed and bleeding. Survives bloody tortures from Adrian Chase or on one of his mission before real time S1. Survived clash with shark + lost a lot of blood. Arrow constantly tags bullets from close distance ( without even watching at them and realising sb is gonna shot him just like Diggle) or sees bullrushing motorbike in slow mode as DCEU Wonder Woman. Or he dodges pissed off Overgirl heat vision + tanks HER PUNCHES. Absurdal pain endurance like escaping from underground lifting paralysed Felicity simultaneously being fatally stabbed and poisoned by methane and multiple of times stabbed with arrows still can fight as it was nothing just like berserker. Tanks hits from dominators, John Diggle's punches or Atom's bullrushing and so more. That powerful is Comicbook Arrow. either pre new 52 or new 52.

To me in case of MCU/DCEU/CW:

Live action feats >= Animated movies based one live action ( like Vixes or Freedom Fighters ) > comicbooks based on live actions = statements from movies/tv series

I actually agree with that. ?

wonder woman was faster than 1003 m/s bullets. Hulk is doing nothing.

@subline: In Justice League she literally moved fast enough to Block machine gun fire. Idk why everyone underrates Diana on this site.

Wonder Woman also reacted to and blocked lightning in her own movie, and thats superior to any speed feat anyone in the mcu has ever had

@DammeFavour: Most people on this site are Thor fanboys, it’s unavoidable

I'd have to say no, assuming this is standard battle forum distance of 10 ft apart.

@emmafrostxmen: Given that there are people on this site who claim that Thor (MCU version at any rate) can get taken down by electricity and isn't bullet-proof, I'd strongly beg to differ.

@scipio123: c’mon man you know there are a lot more Thor fanboys than there are for any other character.

Tbh I think people only like to say “Thor isn’t bulletproof” to anger all of the whiny Thor fanboys.

@emmafrostxmen: Thor has his fair share of blind fanboys, but no more than any other character.

And there are plenty of people on here who seriously argue that Thor can be taken down by bullets and electricity.

@plotweapon16255 said:

@bdelloidgrain2 said:

@subline said:

Yes, he caught an RPG-7 Missile which travels at 300m/s.

This.

But she traveled faster then the bullets that travels 917 m/s to block it.

917 m/s >>> 300 m/s

How did she travel faster than the bullets when she crossed less distance in the same time?

he couldnt react to me

@scipio123: It’s kind of sad Wonder Woman doesn’t have too many of those. She does have her fanboys, but no where near as many as Thor, Superman, Batman, Or even Iron Man.

The bullets moved faster than her. They covered more distance in the same time While she covered less

@sexybayonetta22: I think feats from tie-in comics are perfectly valid so long as they aren't contradicted by anything in the movies.

In the case of the MCU, the comics are clearly meant to be part of the canon, as events from them are sometimes referenced in the movies. For example, Rhodey lifting a tank in an IM3 prelude comic was directly referenced in the party scene in AOU.

Hulk's feat of catching an RPG is also perfectly legit since Abomination did exactly that in TIH. On the other hand, Black Widow dodging bullets is a bit more suspect, since she's never done that in the movies.

At one point someone almost argued bullets>>storm breaker

@supermanforever: @emmafrostxmen: @macleen: @ecoblitz: look a feat of Hulk he destroy justice league ending JL.

@minlerdemon said:

@supermanforever: @emmafrostxmen: @macleen: @ecoblitz: look a feat of Hulk he destroy justice league ending JL.

This is pretty funny :)

@scipio123: yeah i agree. Ok nice too read them to enrich our knowledge about mcu or cw but as i, you and mr surreal say in vs debates live action feats goes to first place then canon comic book.

@minlerdemon: Simple MCU wanking. All hype, no feats.

He got disabled at the start of the fight, wonder woman doesn't have the physicals to stun hulk like that

But i cant see him reacting anyways

Completely ignoring the fact that Diana hasn't blitzed anyone, People need to research on how faster than someone you have to be to blitz, just because I'm faster than my fat cousins doesn't mean I can blitz him

Right, other than Doomsday, Steppenwolf, Ares, numerous Parademons, numerous WW1 soliders, and blitzing multiple times in essentially every appearance, no she hasn't blitzed anyone.

Hulk gets blitzed because his one reaction feat is exceeded by her travel and blitz feats.

@leonardsnart: You don't consider the gif in Post 37 by SexyBaynonetta of this thread a blitz?

simple no

@ipvman: "Right, other than Doomsday" your post failed in the very beginning

And you ignored the main part of my post

@celestialknight: if that's a blitz then even Ironman blitzes...