@jedixman: problem with this is this will eventually get too long. +There is a much higher chance the questions wouldnt get as many answers as before and replies to different questions being on the same page would make a mess. It will be much harder to find the answers you are looking for too. This is not a good idea.
Can "X" Do This? Feat Analysis/Comparison Thread
@jedixman: problem with this is this will eventually get too long. +There is a much higher chance the questions wouldnt get as many answers as before and replies to different questions being on the same page would make a mess. It will be much harder to find the answers you are looking for too. This is not a good idea.
If only for quarantining these kinds of threads to one topic this is a great idea.
Honestly, this is an excellent idea. Can X do this threads stopped being original a long time ago with people asking asinine questions and adding to spam.
As long as the tagging system exists, the questions or answers wont be that hard to find.
@brucerogers: They dont need to be original. vs debate arent but they are the reason most people use this site. There being so many of these shows lots of people enjoy it.
For the answers, they will be spread over 50+ pages and will be mixed with answers for 10s of other debates.
@nwgzsjuwhm96y2: People use this site to debate in Can X do this threads?
@brucerogers: since there are so many threads like this i guess it may be one of the reasons for some people
i was talking about vs debates anyway
This thread wouldn't exist if you guys hadn't turned general discussion into battle forum 2.0
Is this the best idea? Probably not, but turning a forum into something that it's not isn't either.
@youshallnotpass: eh, that's almost a good idea. But besides these basic questions what else would go in there that wouldn't also fit under off topic or gen discussion
@youshallnotpass: eh, that's almost a good idea. But besides these basic questions what else would go in there that wouldn't also fit under off topic or gen discussion
I think we should create a live action forum altogether.
@higherpower: They already are actually.
That is if you by "we" you mean the non-existent Comic Vine staff. Then yes, they are doing their best work on the newest updates.
(Lel Jk)
^^^That's not a bad idea.
Rench already addressed that in another thread, said it can't be done.
^^^That's not a bad idea.
Rench already addressed that in another thread, said it can't be done.
Yeah I saw it after I said that.
@cor_tsar: It could just be a discussion of feats and powerlevels. Maybe throw in tier lists and calcs.
@jedixman: My only question is, what are we really cluttering? It's not like these threads are blocking any actual good or original battles, just more LA ones.
But then again, I don't really care for these types of threads either.
No. That is a decision the engineers make not the moderators.
A new forum for the same cancerous threads have 0 effort put in and are entirely repetitive? Are you guys kidding?
They've been overdone to the point they're spam. They don't really deserve to exist let alone a forum.
For anyone complaining about this thread...
The overwhelming amount of threads about this clutter the boards. The choice is between having this thread and having them banned outright.
Pick your poison.
This
For anyone who thinks this is not going to work as one thread, visit the CaVs thread and see how well it works
I don't think this is a good idea. Nothing about those threads were against the rules, and it seems silly to try to stop something that is helping keep the site alive. As much as people complained about those threads, they were very popular and always got a lot of responses. I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed anymore because some people find them annoying. I always thought they could be fun, and you simply aren't going to get the level of focused discussion about a feat in this thread compared to a thread dedicated to a feat. Already, the first two pages of this thread are just people giving their opinion on if this should be a thread or not.
Why are feat analysis or comparison threads any worse than all the battle threads? There are plenty of battle threads, plenty of off-topic threads, plenty of RPG threads, and I just don't see why comparison threads can't be allowed to exist too. You might as well make one giant thread for everything then. No more individual battle threads allowed, only one giant battle thread for every battle. Doesn't that seem a little silly? Especially if those threads are one of the most popular things on the website?
I don't think this is a good idea. Nothing about those threads were against the rules, and it seems silly to try to stop something that is helping keep the site alive. As much as people complained about those threads, they were very popular and always got a lot of responses. I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed anymore because some people find them annoying. I always thought they could be fun, and you simply aren't going to get the level of focused discussion about a feat in this thread compared to a thread dedicated to a feat. Already, the first two pages of this thread are just people giving their opinion on if this should be a thread or not.
Why are feat analysis or comparison threads any worse than all the battle threads? There are plenty of battle threads, plenty of off-topic threads, plenty of RPG threads, and I just don't see why comparison threads can't be allowed to exist too. You might as well make one giant thread for everything then. No more individual battle threads allowed, only one giant battle thread for every battle. Doesn't that seem a little silly? Especially if those threads are one of the most popular things on the website?
Great detailed response.
This thread wouldn't exist if you guys hadn't turned general discussion into battle forum 2.0
Is this the best idea? Probably not, but turning a forum into something that it's not isn't either.
To be fair, those threads should just be put into battle threads. Some rules are dumb and should be changed. Instead, we have methodical killing of various potential threads. As you can see, you post a feat and a question here, you will get 1 answer tops and no discussion. Nobody cares about these enough to check them at all, and not seeing what is being showcased really kills the point. If the problem was the fact that they were in the gen Discussion, wouldn't it be better to just move them to Battle threads?
For anyone complaining about this thread...
The overwhelming amount of threads about this clutter the boards. The choice is between having this thread and having them banned outright.
Pick your poison.
Really? That is obviously a really bad way to approach the community. Not that i am surprised by that type of attitude by CV, but come on. Threads and discussions are what keeps forums alive and killing out threads will not make for a better forum viewing experience.
I don't think this is a good idea. Nothing about those threads were against the rules, and it seems silly to try to stop something that is helping keep the site alive. As much as people complained about those threads, they were very popular and always got a lot of responses. I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed anymore because some people find them annoying. I always thought they could be fun, and you simply aren't going to get the level of focused discussion about a feat in this thread compared to a thread dedicated to a feat. Already, the first two pages of this thread are just people giving their opinion on if this should be a thread or not.
Why are feat analysis or comparison threads any worse than all the battle threads? There are plenty of battle threads, plenty of off-topic threads, plenty of RPG threads, and I just don't see why comparison threads can't be allowed to exist too. You might as well make one giant thread for everything then. No more individual battle threads allowed, only one giant battle thread for every battle. Doesn't that seem a little silly? Especially if those threads are one of the most popular things on the website?
@ldm: Your not allowed to post links to websites that host comics. I'm gonna have to ban you for 3 days. Don't do it again.
Why is posting links from external image hosting websites against the rules all of a sudden? The "New Images/Scans Rule" thread specifically states the following:
"A workaround is by posting links to external photo/scan sites. We don't have any control over that. We just don't want the full scans on our site. Also, links to videos of the full comics are against the rules, as that is akin to linking to a pirated copy."
https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/updated-clarified-new-images-scans-rule-1623136/
@bluelettermedia: I mean sites that post entire comics online. Its piracy. Posting to something like imageshack or imgur is fine.
I don't think this is a good idea. Nothing about those threads were against the rules, and it seems silly to try to stop something that is helping keep the site alive. As much as people complained about those threads, they were very popular and always got a lot of responses. I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed anymore because some people find them annoying. I always thought they could be fun, and you simply aren't going to get the level of focused discussion about a feat in this thread compared to a thread dedicated to a feat. Already, the first two pages of this thread are just people giving their opinion on if this should be a thread or not.
Why are feat analysis or comparison threads any worse than all the battle threads? There are plenty of battle threads, plenty of off-topic threads, plenty of RPG threads, and I just don't see why comparison threads can't be allowed to exist too. You might as well make one giant thread for everything then. No more individual battle threads allowed, only one giant battle thread for every battle. Doesn't that seem a little silly? Especially if those threads are one of the most popular things on the website?
I don't think this is a good idea. Nothing about those threads were against the rules, and it seems silly to try to stop something that is helping keep the site alive. As much as people complained about those threads, they were very popular and always got a lot of responses. I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed anymore because some people find them annoying. I always thought they could be fun, and you simply aren't going to get the level of focused discussion about a feat in this thread compared to a thread dedicated to a feat. Already, the first two pages of this thread are just people giving their opinion on if this should be a thread or not.
Why are feat analysis or comparison threads any worse than all the battle threads? There are plenty of battle threads, plenty of off-topic threads, plenty of RPG threads, and I just don't see why comparison threads can't be allowed to exist too. You might as well make one giant thread for everything then. No more individual battle threads allowed, only one giant battle thread for every battle. Doesn't that seem a little silly? Especially if those threads are one of the most popular things on the website?
Can MCU Spiderman do this?
Yes, Peter is stronger than MCU Super/Centipede Soldiers
not the real Red Hulk, not Ross. this red hulk has been rather unimpressive in feats nothing short of Rhino Tear jobbing at the moment
@warlockmage: Yea I know. But I thought he was a lot stronger than rhino.
@warlockmage: Yea I know. But I thought he was a lot stronger than rhino.
ehh nothing from what I've seen him do has been anything anywhere close to impressive.
So Dragonball is still banned?
Good.
That was your take away from this thread?
@oldkingthanos: Nah.I said because even in these day flame war started Whenever someone create DB vs Another character
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment