Can DCEU Superman perform the IG "snap' and survive?

Seeing as how he's more physically capable than Thanos & Hulk, he can do the killing and reviving snap and survive. He could survive destroying the stones too, but how much damage will he take? We won't know unless he becomes an MCU caharcter.

He survives one, easily. Thanos and Bruce both survived and neither of them had the added benefit of the sun healing. I reckon he could do it a few times but would probably die after that

If hulk was the perfect fit due to the gamma radiation its emits then superman at best would have a messed up arm aswell.

Thanos has the best durability feat since he snapped twice and was still in better shape than hulk

Yes. If he's badly injured after the snap the sun will just heal him.

He's wounded but the sun just patches him up. In theory, he could do it several times with ease.

Lol no. He got one shotted and zomdiefied by a nuke in the kiloton range. A universal snap kills him outright. Not even Thor could survived and Thor>Superman by feats

If we look at this as objectively as possible: Superman would definitely survive but will be damaged like Hulk and Thanos due to the radiation, as we’ve seen radiation physically harm him already from the nuke.

But if you’re a DCEU fanboy, you probably think that he casually no sells 100 snaps and if you’re an MCU fanboy you probably think that 1 snap vaporises him.

@jay_z94: Superman can heal because of sun, there's no reason he couldn't perform multiple snaps.

Superman is a deus ex machina hero.... so of course.

Only one thing kills or hurt him, Kryptonite, hence why he's not very interesting in cinematic films.

No he die IW thor >>> superman.

Prolly 2-3 snaps.

He’s more durable than Hulk and Thanos, so yeah he’d survive.

@jashugan: @programmerseth: @zansuke: @sportjames23: If thanos need kill.

Yup

No way survive he die in one snap.

stark guantlet ''output can light up a continent'' stated by tony and idk how gamma radiation interacts with solar energised beings . just giving some notes

Gets roasted.

@chuggachugga170: enough that even a human can survive it without disintegrating

@lan_fan: @ready_4_madness: @thevvitchking:@galactic_1000: He die horribly.

He survive but the damage is permanent even the time and reality stones can’t reverse it

@luminoushydra:the 616 guantlet snapping didnt destroy the surrounding area. does that mean its wall level then?

Superman is vulnerable to harmful radiation, so Idk. He could probably just heal afterwards, even Tony would've survived if he had healing factor.

Yes He can survive

@chuggachugga170: 616 Infinity Gauntlet doesn't work like that, at all. Low tiers like Captain America and mid high tiers like Gamora can wield it fine alright, it's a bad example to bring up it here.

OT: Superman is physically more capable than the both of them, and having a decent healing factor (y'know the sun), would mean he can snap probably a few times before completely tiring.

@lan_fan: I think d reason who tony survived was because he just took out thanos and his men unlike hulk and thanos who wiped and recreated half d population of the universe,

I don't know if it was tru or not but stark said something about d energy of the snap been continental level , saying it could wipe a continent, if dats tru do u think supes can take dat much power

@kinglouie: one to erase 50% and another time to destroy all the stones

DCEU Superman could have solved every problem in that movie. That's the issue with an OP character like that.

no way to tell honestly

Endgame messed up power levels

Considering Superman's history with radiation, I doubt he would survive.

Keep in mind that Hulk only survived (abit barely, with half of his upper body basically burned to the point that he couldn't move it) due to his body being able to absorb most of the harmful energy due to it being sourced as mostly Gamma radiation.

The power of the Stark Gauntlet (NOT the original gauntlet, which was made out of much stronger material) was capable of fuelling a entire continent. The question is if Superman could take that amount of power/radiation, and considering he's died to much less (a nuke) he's not living through the process.

If the sunlight does heal him I don't see why he couldn't spam it. If we take away the healing factor he can definitely do at least one snap.

Should be able to do at least a snap or two imho.

Obviously

Bizarre. The opinions in the comment section don't match the votes at all

@emperorb777: Sure, he could perform multiple snaps but only if he’s healed from the sun in-between snaps, which takes time. It’s not as if he can casually snap 10 times right after the other for example.

Lots of butthurt MCU fans on this thread. Superman could effortlessly do multiple snaps, esp. in sunlight. People saying he can't want to lowball him, because they're sad he beats their favorite characters. Haha.

Only reason Thanos got hurt, was because he used them to destroy them and the energy released wounded him.

Lmao no.

Thanos scales from Thor's ring feat and therefore causing extensive harm to him puts the snap far above Superman, who was almost killed by a nuke.

I'm convinced you have like 2 brain cells at a max. Either that or you're an 8 year old with Superman bed sheets.

He could survive a few even without sunlight, IMO. With the sun, I don't see him tiring out. That's not to say that he can casually keep snapping, but if he gives himself a few minutes between snaps, he should be fine.

Dying after one snap??? In what world

He can do 1-2 snaps without dying.

This site get's dumber and dumber with time.

He could only do one snap max and it would probably leave him permanently damaged and weakened