@entropy_aegis: We can all like our preferent Robin I guess. As long as there are people that like Tim Drake he is not going to be irrelevant. Just like you mention Damian. Many people think a "blood son" is pretty useless. In fact, many people precisely resent Damian Wayne because they feel he pushed the other Robins aside. But that dosen't make Damian less usless or necessary.
The same is true for any character, even if they don't bring anything new. I personally only like Richard Grayson as Robin. To me the others are only copycats of the original and are pretty much unnecessary. Just like the many Batgirls. But there are many people that like Stephanie, Cassandra and even Carrie Kelley. Some people even like Duke Thomas, some don't.
The problem I think is that Batman is a very old character. And on this days we have a generational gap more evident than before. And people is always going to love what they know most. Newer generations like Damian, Jason or Tim more. Other people loved the old Batman crew as it was. And others love the stuff of the 80's and so on and on.
And well, like many on this forums I agree that DC is doing a poor job at maintaining and giving relevance to the many diverse and different characters they have. I also think the writers themselves aren't familiar with said characters. Many are younger writers the same age their readers. And perhaps they grown up with their own favorite characters and with their own personal veiws on them.
Tim Drake is a fan favorite from the 90's and many people in their 30's or early 40's is still going to like the character. Imagine people in their 60's and 70's!!! Do you guys really think they are more likely to know or care about someone called Bane? or Damian? or Duke Thomas? lol no!!. There are maybe some of them of course, but only true super-geeks love that suff. I don't doubt they exist. Yet, this is not consistent in reality, because people in their 20's today can love the old characters from before and hate the new ones, anyway. And vice versa.
Maybe DC instead of making their own characters compete for attention with their public and condense everythig into one "canon crap", they should look more into this gap and fix it with alternate realities or somethig lol. But we know that never truly work. We seen what they do.
Except its not about my preferences or those of other fans. Its not about who or what fans think is useless. I already explained that its about marketing. DC can market Nightwing, Red Hood and Son of Batman (so no its not useless), what do they market Tim with? Mr 199 IQ mastermind? lol Tynion even tried it and failed and if they cant market him then he's useless. They're a business at the end of the day, they dont exist to cater to Tim fans from 2 decades ago.
This resentment you speak of doesn't really exist, its just entitlement from specific quarters. Jason and Dick have been more relevant than they've ever been. If Damian gets good stories in comics then its simply because his writers are capable of writing good stories. Resenting a character for getting good stories is meaningless. Its like hating Batman for getting good stories, pointless really. For example Morrison is going to write Arkham Asylum 2 with Damian and that book is going to be mammoth hit whenever it comes out even if its only 25% as good as its predecessor. Entitlement that it doesn't star another Robin will change absolutely nothing. DC cant force Morrison, Tomasi etc to write stories with Tim or another Robin. By that logic Damian fans should resent Tim because Tynion used Tim in Tec while completely ignoring Damian or maybe they should resent Lobdell for writing Jason in his own book.
With regard to mainstream media:
Jason Todd in other media before Damian's existence=0
Jason Todd in other media after Damian's existence= Under the Hood, Arkham Knight, Injustice 2 and Batman Ninja
Tim is the same as he always was, nothing has changed. Damian's addition has had absolutely no impact on Tim. Tim had 2 decades before Damian to make a mark in animation, film and games it didn't happen. Even when he shows up he's a token generic Robin.
Dick is getting a movie and a live action show and he has enjoyed consistent exposure in animation.
What you say about writers and generations is true for any era, its just what it is. But characters can catch up, you mentioned Bane. Go to Wiki and you'll find that Bane has a completely separate page just for his mainstream media appearances, he's THAT exposed. He's absolutely on par with Catwoman, Riddler, Penguin and Two-Face in terms of recognition and iconic status despite the former having more than a 4 decade head start. Harley Quinn is another example, she's on par with Joker at this point. On other hand, type Tim Drake on Google and see the (rather appalling) results for yourself. All these characters were created in the 90's, it just goes to show that for characters to stay relevant they need to evolve and be marketable. Tim is stuck in the 90's, a receding fan base isn't something DC is go big in investing on and nostalgia can only carry you for so long.
Again its about marketing, characters can be diverse and different but if they cant market them then it amounts to nothing, alternate universes aren't going to change that. Even in alternate universes they focus on the marketable characters, Marvel's Ultimate lines for instance focused on the Avengers, Spidey, X-Men etc not Black Knight or Prowler. Black Label Bat books are about Batman not Stephanie Brown.
Log in to comment