Parents Outraged Over "Batman" Comic

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for no_name_
No_Name_

16193

Forum Posts

2734

Wiki Points

94523

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 2

Edited By No_Name_

 

No Caption Provided
When it came to comics, I would say I was sort of a late bloomer and I really didn't delve into them until I was in my upper teens. So when I read an article in the Charlotte Chronicle today about parents who were outraged over "Batman
Batman Confidential #18
Batman Confidential #18
Confidential #18," I kind of rolled my eyes, knowing that parents can be parents and that could mean they overreact sometimes. Then again, what I may not find offensive, someone else very well could.  How bad could it have been, really? Thinking back to the issue, I can recall there being a weak plot, and 'okay' art until I remembered the content. In the issue, Catwoman steals Commissioner Gordon's notebook, and Batgirl (Gordon) chases Selina to a nudist club. There's the kicker; the nudist club part. So maybe these parents in Charlotte, North Carolina had a case. Having read the comic, though; it sounds much worse than it actually is. While the comic itself, from what I remember did take the two female characters to a nudist club; it was far from pornographic. In fact, it was almost campy. The level of graphic material was insignificant compared to what we see in Moore's "The Killing Joke," or Millar's "All Star Batman and Robin." Then again, I read comics; these people obviously don't; so seeing the panels was obviously a bigger deal for them than it would be for me.
For a dime, Spivock bought the comic book last week for her 12-year-old son at Mecklenburg's South County Regional Library. Her kids recently discovered the 1960s Batman TV show. The most eye-popping scene is a two-page spread showing Batgirl's body-to-body tussle with Catwoman for the important notebook. But it doesn't look like a struggle, and contains none of those exclamations from the TV show: POW! BOOM! WHAM! Spivock and her husband, Bill, were not amused.
Okay, the "Batman" television show? Have these people been living in a cave for the last 50 years that they have not watched "Batman Begins" or "The Dark Knight" ? Even Joel Shoemaker and Tim Burton's film versions of Batman were a far cry from the campy and playful Adam West television interpretation of Batman of yesteryear. Even so, I should not be so insensitive. As parents, I feel that if they are really concerned with the reading material their children are exposed to, it is ultimately their responsibility to screen the material beforehand. However, I do feel that DC comics does not do enough to aid parents in that endeavor and that maybe they should take some responsibility.

The call for a rating system!

No Caption Provided
Stop reading this, right now. Get up, go to your dresser and pick up the last Marvel comic you purchased. Don't open it. Look at the cover. On the bottom left you will see a rating system which will indicate one of the following four options:

  • # ALL AGES
Appropriate for readers of all ages.

  • # A
Appropriate for ages 9 and up.

  • # T+ TEENS & UP
Appropriate for most readers 13 and up, parents are advised that they may want to read before or with younger children.

  • # PARENTAL ADVISORY
15+ years old similar to T+ but featuring more mature themes and/or more graphic imagery. Recommended for teen and adult readers.

  • # MAX: EXPLICIT CONTENT
18+ years old Most Mature Readers books will fall under the MAX Comics banner, (created specifically for mature content titles) MAX and Mature-themed titles will continue to be designed to appear distinct from mainline Marvel titles, with the "MAX: Explicit Content" label very prominently displayed on the cover. MAX titles will NOT be sold on the newsstand, and they will NOT be marketed to younger readers.

Marvel does this with each and every one of their issues, and a lot of people seem to think that it might be in DC's best interest to adopt a similar rating system in order to prevent instances such as these from re-occuring.
"DC seriously needs to adopt a rating system for their books. I don't know why they haven't started yet."- Tina/Batmansgirl via http://twitter.com/batmansgirl
Tina, I completely agree. I have personally always felt that as a publishing company with content that varies in being very innocent to sometimes very graphic; it may be in their best interest to utilize a rating system similar to Marvel's. However, this does beg the question: will instilling a rating system for all DC Comics, or perhaps a unanimous rating system for all comics in general really make that much of a difference to some parents? I know, I know; always the pessimist, but how often have I seen parents complain about content in the media in the past? While I feel that DC should input a rating system of their own, I don't necessarily feel that it will make a dramatic difference in the way some parents approach comics. In the end, I really feel that ultimately they are the ones in control over the material that their children are exposed to, and I am sure that Mr. and Mrs. Spivock's 12 year old son has been exposed to much worse material via the internet and "Victoria's Secret" catalogs than what he saw in that issue of Batman Confidential.

Lastly, in no way do I find it a coincidence that this article was printed in the Charlotte, North Carolina newspaper just in time for the Charlotte, North Carolina "Heroes Convention." Just saying.
Avatar image for jamiracles
Jamiracles

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Jamiracles

I think the problem is parents sitting their kids in front of the TV or any old thing and then being surprised when GI JOE detonates the F-Bomb.

I didnt realize DC didnt have a rating system, though.

Avatar image for vortex13
Vortex13

12140

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Vortex13

Some parent's will be outraged regardless of how tame the subject matter. What I find hilarious is that it's hardly ever about violence which is much more present in most comics than sex. I have no problem with either one and I agree that it is the parents responsibility to screen material for their children. Also they're going to learn about sex and nudity no matter what, chances are that kid's already thinking about sex.

Avatar image for vortex13
Vortex13

12140

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Vortex13
@Jamiracles: The have a little thing that says approved by the comic code (I just checked) but yea I didn't realize it either.
Avatar image for asymmetrical
Asymmetrical

23750

Forum Posts

1010044

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 97

User Lists: 19

#4  Edited By Asymmetrical

I never pay any heed to the rating systems, but the fact that parents all seem to think comics are "kid-friendly" or even for kids does annoy me, it's not the kid's fault his mom bought him a comic she didn't approve and its not DC's...the only problem I see here is her assumption

Avatar image for sparda
Sparda

15794

Forum Posts

4748

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By Sparda

I think that it's really the parents fault for not at least sifting through the comic before hand, or at least gaining some sort of knowledge of it. If they don't want to read through it themselves, I'm sure a quick google-search could find the info they wanted.

Although, it's strange for DC to not have a rating system. Just from some of the stuff I've read, DC has (like you said) a wide range of content that goes from pretty innocent to fairly graphic.

Avatar image for thedastardlyhippo
TheDastardlyHippo

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By TheDastardlyHippo
Conservatives: Ruining comics since 1954.
Avatar image for vortex13
Vortex13

12140

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Vortex13
@TheDastardlyHippo: lol
Avatar image for the_ghostshell
The_Ghostshell

84303

Forum Posts

11204

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By The_Ghostshell

My personal opinion (and of course I'm not a parent) is that the Spivock family saw an opportunity to get five minutes of fame and took it. Like you said in your closing Babs, I to have to question the timing of this incident. If their excuse is that they watched the old Adam West Batman t.v. show and decided to then purchase Batman Confidential #18 and were shocked by the content, I'm not buying it. You can take one look at the cover and clearly see its a far cry from the T.V. show. Catwoman's custom is all torn not to mention her chest is heavily exaggerated. That right there should have raised a red flag for this uber sensitive mother. At the very least you would think it would have caused her to open it up and flip through a couple pages. Hahahaha I mean wtf, Batman isn't even on the cover. You would think after watching the show she would have at least picked up an issue with the star on the cover. But that's just me. Not to mention the kid was 12, 12! Good thing she didnt check out a comic with Powergirl, she would have never recovered and probably sued the Library.

Now having said that, there's really no excuse for DC comics not to have a rating system. Will it stop parents like the Spivocks from protesting or complaining about the mature nature of comics, no, but at least it takes some of their ammunition away.





Avatar image for nova_prime_
Nova`Prime`

4172

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Nova`Prime`

The problem isn't the rating system and if there is one or not. Its parents for the most part are ill-informed. They see a colorful cover and think "My child likes Batman/Spiderman.. I should buy it.. who needs to read it." Then when they get home and glance at it they freak out, first by yelling at the seller, saying stuff like "you are being irresponsible and not informing your customers of the books content." Then they go after the comic company basically saying the same thing, but during the whole process no one says those same things to the parent. No one says "No sir or ma'am you are being irresponsible for not opening the books and either reading it or at least looking over it to find if it is suitable."

Parents today seem to be more interested in letting others, TV, Comic Books, Movies, and the Internet to raise their children. So when the child turns into a mess its not their fault, "they watched to much TV or played to many video games." It makes me sick what this country is turning into. It seems people forget that censorship is what helped the facist germans and the communist russians gain so much power.

Avatar image for shanana
Shanana

60655

Forum Posts

9001

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 4

#10  Edited By Shanana

I love it when i see parents outraged over Comics/Literature, but turn around and buy their kids the latest 007 game lol

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90094

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#11  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator

F#ck parents.It's their fault their kids are f#ck-ups,not comics.Also they need to take the ratings off comics,it's not even remotely necessary  and more importantly nobody even checks for them.

Avatar image for nova_prime_
Nova`Prime`

4172

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By Nova`Prime`
@Vance Astro: 150% agree with you there Vance. The same can be said for video games, the only people that look at them and use them are retailers. The kids certainly don't, most of this little b@st@rds just put their hand out, get money and go buy whatever they want. Then the parents get upset at the sellers. Its not hard, its called being a good parent and half of that is interacting with your kids and know what they are up too.

And that's all for my ranting today.
Avatar image for g_bandit
G'bandit

13664

Forum Posts

965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#13  Edited By G'bandit

Ignorant parents with the same old bs..

Maybe is time to stop blaming shows, movies, comics, mangas, internet sites, etc. and start blaming themselves for not paying attention to what their children are watching or reading..

Is hell easy to blame others.
They think they are perfect but a comic does not fall into a person's hands like magic, it must be chosen, paid for and taken home.

I don't know, maybe they should of read the damn comic that has a hot D-cup spandex kitty girl on the cover with her clothes all tear up in the first place before giving it to their kid.

Avatar image for korg
Korg

11351

Forum Posts

1215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

#14  Edited By Korg
That poor blind woman...
Avatar image for the_ghostshell
The_Ghostshell

84303

Forum Posts

11204

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#15  Edited By The_Ghostshell

I don't see the ranting system as something that's suppose to solve the problem. Its more of an insurance policy or disclaimer for the company. Jon and Sally homemaker cant really complain about buying a comic for a 12 year and being shocked by the content if there's a mature rating on the cover.

Avatar image for anderson__agent_of_smith
Anderson: Agent of SMITH

245

Forum Posts

792

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

@Nova`Prime` said:
 "It seems people forget that censorship is what helped the facist germans and the communist russians gain so much power."

I know this is a bit off topic, but do you mind explaining that? I'm not disagreeing at all, I'm just a bit curious about that idea.
Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90094

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#17  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Nova`Prime` said:
" @Vance Astro: 150% agree with you there Vance. The same can be said for video games, the only people that look at them and use them are retailers. The kids certainly don't, most of this little b@st@rds just put their hand out, get money and go buy whatever they want. Then the parents get upset at the sellers. Its not hard, its called being a good parent and half of that is interacting with your kids and know what they are up too.And that's all for my ranting today. "
I hope the Obama administration will just ignore stupidity like this or he would just make a speech about the parents of America are obligated to raise their kids instead of letting T.V and their objects of interest do it for them.The sad thing about this is we all have to suffer for other people's failures to raise their kids.The more stupid sh#t people do,the more restrictions we have.Pretty soon we aren't going to be able to anything without I.D.
Avatar image for 04nbod
04nbod

191

Forum Posts

21940

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#18  Edited By 04nbod

I too was a late bloomer and agree that DC's ratings system sucks

Avatar image for king_saturn
King Saturn

223467

Forum Posts

509

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By King Saturn
This issue doesnt bother me at all... I will be the judge of what it suitable for my kid to read, watch or whatever... if I feel its unsuitable then I will take care of the issue
Avatar image for incredible_hulk_prime
Incredible Hulk-Prime

1525

Forum Posts

163

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

@Babs:
I agree DC should make a rating system on  their comics like Marvel does.
Avatar image for thedastardlyhippo
TheDastardlyHippo

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sic the CBLDF on 'em.  And then remind them of something called Free Speech.  And then, just for kicks, loan them a copy of Alan Moore's "Lost Girls."

Avatar image for avengpymhawk
avengpymhawk

1034

Forum Posts

96901

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 8

#22  Edited By avengpymhawk

I think that comics should have a rating. My son is now at that age that he is starting to dig (No pun intended) through my comic collection. So being a parent I say yes. Comics mostly from the beginning to the mid 90's were basically kid related. Now a days we have rape, blood, and death, like they are no big deal. The issue in question though, is a group of parents trying to make an example of  nothing. Got to love those southern baptist!

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90094

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#23  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@Incredible Hulk-Prime said:
" @Babs: I agree DC should make a rating system on  their comics like Marvel does. "
I don't think they should have to.Kids don't even read comics.
Avatar image for rich_man
Rich-Man

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By Rich-Man

i think that they need to look at the bigger picture here. I started reading comics when i was a kid because i always thought it would be cool to have super powers, to be a hero and save the world. if more kids read comics then they might see the difference between good and evil, and maybe make a difference when they grow up.  there are comics out there with abit of expilcit material yes, but they are also rated for that reason.
maybe if more kids got interested in comics then less kids would go down the wrong path in life, and think back to that hero they always wanted to be.

Avatar image for thebug
TheBug

1121

Forum Posts

336

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#25  Edited By TheBug

I would have understood the parents if the kid was like 6, but 12?  I think he's mature enough to handle it.

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90094

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#26  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@TheBug said:
"

I would have understood the parents if the kid was like 6, but 12?  I think he's mature enough to handle it.

"
This is true.There is nothing that has ever happened in any Batman comic that anyone should be able to handle but the time he's 12.
Avatar image for mrdirector786
MrDirector786

44094

Forum Posts

23159

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 4

#27  Edited By MrDirector786

DC should have a rating system. Also, how outdated are those parents? Still thinking Batman was like he was in the 1960s? Jesus christ...

Avatar image for getridofdandidio71
getridofdandidio71

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

We are living in an age where most Americans are bunch of whiny beeyotches, most people bitch about the most asinine (did I spell that right?) things these days. I bet you a million bucks these folks voted for McCain. This my generation that's raising children, but they're raising a generation of pussies. I can't stand parents that refuse to take responsibility for their shortcomings and look to blame somebody else instead of themselves.

Avatar image for chubbytoad
Chubbytoad

8

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#29  Edited By Chubbytoad
I think its true that if nothing else, the rating can serve as a "don't blame us, we gave you a rating to follow". These people sound so ignorant, though, that the rating might not have made a difference. For one thing, if they just wanted 5 minutes of fame, they could have argued the rating was too lenient if there was a scene they didn't like. Second, DC has comics that are especially for younger kids. I've seen them on their own shelves in comic stores. If you're THAT much of a prude, the kid versions are very "clean".  Third, some people are so uptight, they are offended by a woman with an ample chest. They will read all kinds of stuff into it to suit their case for immorality, so people like that can't be pleased no matter what you do.  

And can you imagine a MODERN 12 year old boy thinking the Adam West series is great? Maybe the kid already lives in a cave! Hey, I'm surprised they let him watch that show anyway. Julie Newmar is as good as naked in that suit!!! 

Not to diss the old Adam West series, but come on! My step daughter didn't want to sit through it when she was 10. She said its was "kind of silly". I think kids who grew up on modern movies, TV and video games would look at that old series as a kids' show. 

In the end, parents should page through everything they let their kids read or watch. My wife always did. 

A great deal of comic fans today are adults and DC knows this. Today's kids don't read comics like the kids of the past. DC needs to cater to their installed base. They should continue their kid's comic line and put the ratings on the covers but they shouldn't worry about catering to people like Spivock. 

Just my opinion, of course. 
Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90094

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

#30  Edited By vance_astro  Moderator
@getridofdandidio71 said:
" We are living in an age where most Americans are bunch of whiny beeyotches, most people bitch about the most asinine (did I spell that right?) things these days. I bet you a million bucks these folks voted for McCain. This my generation that's raising children, but they're raising a generation of pussies. I can't stand parents that refuse to take responsibility for their shortcomings and look to blame somebody else instead of themselves. "
Speak for yourself.I'm not a whiny beeyotch and I don't personally know any.
Avatar image for logan48227
logan48227

299

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#31  Edited By logan48227

While I do think DC should implement a rating system, it is strange how this "news" broke at the beginning of a comic book convention. In any case, these parents need to relax. 

And somewhere in Hollywood..........Adam West is laughing his @$$ off. 

Avatar image for gmanfromheck
gmanfromheck

42524

Forum Posts

259238

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 472

User Lists: 2

#32  Edited By gmanfromheck
@Gambler said:
" My personal opinion (and of course I'm not a parent) is that the Spivock family saw an opportunity to get five minutes of fame and took it. Like you said in your closing Babs, I to have to question the timing of this incident. If their excuse is that they watched the old Adam West Batman t.v. show and decided to then purchase Batman Confidential #18 and were shocked by the content, I'm not buying it. You can take one look at the cover and clearly see its a far cry from the T.V. show. Catwoman's custom is all torn not to mention her chest is heavily exaggerated. That right there should have raised a red flag for this uber sensitive mother. At the very least you would think it would have caused her to open it up and flip through a couple pages. Hahahaha I mean wtf, Batman isn't even on the cover. You would think after watching the show she would have at least picked up an issue with the star on the cover. But that's just me. Not to mention the kid was 12, 12! Good thing she didnt check out a comic with Powergirl, she would have never recovered and probably sued the Library.

Now having said that, there's really no excuse for DC comics not to have a rating system. Will it stop parents like the Spivocks from protesting or complaining about the mature nature of comics, no, but at least it takes some of their ammunition away. "
Did you see the pic of them?  Yeah, they look reeeeally upset.

No Caption Provided


Avatar image for morpheus_
morpheus_

35306

Forum Posts

11892

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#33  Edited By morpheus_  Moderator
"Good thing she didnt check out a comic with Powergirl, she would have never recovered and probably sued the Library."


@Gambler:
  Quote of the day.
Avatar image for vortex13
Vortex13

12140

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By Vortex13
@G-Man: Is his son sitting in his lap? Because I think you lose lap sitting privileges at 8 at the most.
Avatar image for korg
Korg

11351

Forum Posts

1215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

#35  Edited By Korg

Not to mention she seems to have the comic in question open in front of her presumably younger daughter (and the cat!).

Avatar image for timbojo
Timbojo

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By Timbojo

I AGREE 100% that the issue was far from pornographic and in fact, Was campy.  This is yet another case of a set  parents thinking that everybody in the the world should conduct themselves in accordance with their morality, senese of humor,ect... DC comics is not responsible for raising their kids and should publish what they want. The parents in question have the right to not buy the book. I don't beleive in censorship in any form. that is our right to choose and decide what is appropriate for ourselves. Or as someone else wrote this could also be people just looking for their 15 min of fame. In either case if this is that couples bigest problem then they should count themselves blessed.

Avatar image for rouju
rouju

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By rouju

There's no such thing as bad publicity, and non is better than this kind of

Avatar image for thebug
TheBug

1121

Forum Posts

336

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

#38  Edited By TheBug

Another sad illustration of the moral descent of our society- said one commentor on the Charlotte website.

Thats right folks! Kevin Maguire is leading the moral descent our society!

Avatar image for pheeke
Pheeke

200

Forum Posts

75

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By Pheeke

i don't really think a rating systhem is that neccacary, (couldn't hurt of course), i just think that every kid is different, i could watch scary movies and read scary books at younger age than some others, of ourse if a comic is pornographic it should be on a top shelf away from kids, but it are the parents that should look inside the kids comics from time to time and decide for themselfs if its suitable for their kid. they know best if their own child can handle it, i guess.

Avatar image for emperor_gonzo_noir
Emperor Gonzo Noir

19151

Forum Posts

1989

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 17

@Morpheus_ said:
""Good thing she didnt check out a comic with Powergirl, she would have never recovered and probably sued the Library."


@Gambler:
  Quote of the day. "

lmao
Avatar image for lissbirds
Lissbirds

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#41  Edited By Lissbirds

I think DC should adopt a ratings system like Marvel...it can't hurt.  At least it can give parents some sort of guide.  And I think Marvel shows a little be more breadth in regard to its subject matter than DC does.


Plus, it seems to me that there aren't enough kid-friendly comics out there.  Some comics have traded in their innocence and sense of fun for angst and grit.  Not that there's anything wrong with that (I enjoy the latter quite a bit), but I think there should be enough variety out there for the kiddies to pick from.  Otherwise, if there aren't any kids reading comics now, there won't be any adults reading comics twenty years from now.

Yes, these parents seem to have a stick up their butt and overreacted.  But, I think there needs to be more comics that bridge the gap between Johnny DC kiddie fare and comics intended for a mature audience.  There's just not enough intelligent-yet-fun comics out there geared towards older kids (or kids at heart.)
Avatar image for nibiru
Nibiru

683

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42  Edited By Nibiru

You wanna know why mango and da animu sell way more than comics? Because of stupid assholes like this ruining everything in America. "I'M OFFENDED!!!!!! GIMME MONIES CUZ U OFFENDED ME!!"

Avatar image for jefprice
jefprice

882

Forum Posts

401

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#43  Edited By jefprice
@Babs: Yeah I'm with you here. Bag em and seal em like Marvel did to a lot of them in the 90's or rate them, or better yet, just be a responsible parent and pay attention to what your giving your kids and what they're reading.  
Avatar image for theblueangel93
TheBlueAngel93

21064

Forum Posts

16240

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -1

#44  Edited By TheBlueAngel93

....I got nothing

Avatar image for the_martian
The_Martian

37399

Forum Posts

15361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#45  Edited By The_Martian

There should be an official rating system on comics, just like there are for games and movies. If parents let their kids get comics rated for older readers then that is their fault for being dumb.

Avatar image for alicehatter
AliceHatter

112

Forum Posts

1977

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#46  Edited By AliceHatter
@G-Man:
@G-Man said:
" @Gambler said:
" My personal opinion (and of course I'm not a parent) is that the Spivock family saw an opportunity to get five minutes of fame and took it. Like you said in your closing Babs, I to have to question the timing of this incident. If their excuse is that they watched the old Adam West Batman t.v. show and decided to then purchase Batman Confidential #18 and were shocked by the content, I'm not buying it. You can take one look at the cover and clearly see its a far cry from the T.V. show. Catwoman's custom is all torn not to mention her chest is heavily exaggerated. That right there should have raised a red flag for this uber sensitive mother. At the very least you would think it would have caused her to open it up and flip through a couple pages. Hahahaha I mean wtf, Batman isn't even on the cover. You would think after watching the show she would have at least picked up an issue with the star on the cover. But that's just me. Not to mention the kid was 12, 12! Good thing she didnt check out a comic with Powergirl, she would have never recovered and probably sued the Library.

Now having said that, there's really no excuse for DC comics not to have a rating system. Will it stop parents like the Spivocks from protesting or complaining about the mature nature of comics, no, but at least it takes some of their ammunition away. "
Did you see the pic of them?  Yeah, they look reeeeally upset.

No Caption Provided
"
BAHAHA the girls look stoned!!!
Avatar image for storm_rider
Storm Rider

174

Forum Posts

1615

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

#47  Edited By Storm Rider
@TheDastardlyHippo said:
"
Conservatives: Ruining comics since 1954.
"
Conservatives? Try idiots. A political ideology has nothing to do with this. If they want to impose their limited, structured and controlled (most assuredly religion-driven) viewpoint on their children, the least they could do is make sure everything they hand their children is censored and whitewashed enough for their liking.



Avatar image for korg
Korg

11351

Forum Posts

1215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

#48  Edited By Korg
@Nobody said:
" There should be an official rating system on comics, just like there are for games and movies. If parents let their kids get comics rated for older readers then that is their fault for being dumb. "
You do know Marvel already does this, right?
Avatar image for dh69
DH69

4324

Forum Posts

102

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49  Edited By DH69

I can see why these idiots...i mean parents, are unhappy with this. to be honest its very understandable, without a rating system for dc how are they supposed to know if its aproppriate for their kids to read. these people are coming from the days where comics and other media didnt have this level of content. most comics have grown with their readers becoming more and more mature as the years grew buy. marvel realized this and they were smart to incorporate a ratings system, hell they even pumped out the marvel adventures series that is geared for younger readers. but seriously over reacting like this from parent is nothing new and comics have been coming into the line of fire more and more lately its just the way things are.

Avatar image for the_devil_tiger
The Devil Tiger

1278

Forum Posts

261

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50  Edited By The Devil Tiger
@Nova`Prime` said:
"@Vance Astro: 150% agree with you there Vance. The same can be said for video games, the only people that look at them and use them are retailers. The kids certainly don't, most of this little b@st@rds just put their hand out, get money and go buy whatever they want. Then the parents get upset at the sellers. Its not hard, its called being a good parent and half of that is interacting with your kids and know what they are up too.And that's all for my ranting today."
Yup ! I'll agree with you !

This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.