Yes there is. Ms Marvel v2 #21 and #22 says that when Carol and Cru separate, they'll both become stronger. Carol and Cru separated in Ms Marvel v2 #23.
But we don't know how much. Or do we?
My question for awhile has been why are alot of these armors suggested to be physically superior to the older ones by posters?
When they've done pretty much the same stuff in regards to combat and some less in regards to feats.. where does anyone get the idea there more stronger or faster. I can understand overall power, but physicals. Not really.
Man I don't know. Trust me, there are a lot of Modern armors weaker than Classic Armors. For instance there is Heroes Return Armor from late 90s. It was his standard armor just before 2000s and that armor is his weakest armor by feats.
The Iron-man that lost to Carol is featless Hulkbuster who failed to damage Captain America by any significant margin.
I see a lot of Bendis feats for Iron Man used in threads for Stark supporters, they go out the window when there against or something?
While most people would consider that argument to be full of double standards, it is not that way. It is ok to use feats from Bendis if they are comparable to character's consistent showing. For instance, if Thor destroys the planet and it is written by Bendis than it is valid because Thor shown to be capable of destroying the planet more than once.
If Thor punched Iron-man with his full strength and he fails to take him down it is a bad writing because Thor is more than capable of taking down Iron-man with his full strength. If an instance like that is written by Bendis then we use that argument on how it is written by Bendis who usually writes other characters as too strong or too weak. However, sometimes he writes a comic where character does something he is capable of based on consistent showing and those are feats Iron-man supporters use. At least I do. I don't know about the others.
Given what I've been involved in recently I've also seen alot of things referenced for Iron Man in several threads over, with pretty critical context.
What do you mean?
Log in to comment