@dernman: Batman being a vigilante to me personally it makes sense that he'd reach that breaking point, Arkham Knight did it well as well, to me it already made him interesting because he's much more flawed and it elevated Superman's importance as well.
Batman is a vigilante to me also but he still wouldn't act like that. He is more in control and self aware than that. Batman is already flawed. He doesn't need flawes that are not attributed to him.
- He's obsessive
- has impossibly high standards for those he works with
- has trouble working with others.
- has trust issues even for friends which is why he has the counter measures
- he pushes people away
Would have looked for a way to take Superman down should he eventually go rogue. Sure but he would not put it into action until he himself has proven that he has.
THe fact Batman was handled the way he was made him come off as a villain because that's the exact same way many of SUperman's villains have been. If it was anyone but Batman doing that people would be saying he was a villain.
Afleck cannot be the best because it's so much wrong like that that wont allow him to be.
----------------------------------------
No it did not elevate SUperman's important. It was superficial lip service with no substance behind it
In fact the whole thing where they're now trying to say Superman is such a huge symbol in JLA makes not sense because they never properly developed that in both movies. About the only thing they did for that was have SUperman die. THis failure is one of the reasons so many SUperman fans are disappointed in the DCCU's portrayal of Superman.
Log in to comment