Exclusive Preview: TEEN TITANS #7

I'm going to keep reading but I've kind of lost hope for this run of the Titans. Don't get me wrong I still think they will have a bright future, but this run has already fizzled out.

Hopefully in time the Titans will be back to their former glory.

Cassandra Sandmark looks beauty like the art itself.

Great art. I dislike Raven's look. Somebody help her

how does Raven see in that costume?

Question: Why is Wonder girl asking about Tanya's suit when she has already seen it and spent a portion of last issue talking to her?

Plus with the whole mushroom cloud going on behind her, is now the time to ask about costumes?

Haven't read any of this new Titans series, but ALMOST EVERYTHING I read about it is negative except for the art. I've said before: bad art will kill a good story, but great art can't save a bad one.

Wait, did I miss something? I thought Teen Titans had way more issues than this.

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai: They restarted. So there are now 2 series of new 52 Teen Titans.

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai: Relaunch, new creative team, better than the last run but still less than perfect

*sigh* Only at DC

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai said:

Marvel did the exact same thing with every series back when they did "All New Marvel Now"

If you're referring to the New Teen Titans era, that's not going to happen. It was lightning in a bottle.

@self-dceit said:

I think it could happen, and even if it couldn't who knows, maybe we could at least come close.

Didn't they still keep the old series going?

(idk, I'm only getting back into marvel recently)

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai: What happened was after Marvel Now (the big renumbering of all their series back to #1) they experienced a sale decline, so to boost sales again they set all the books that were currently running back to #1 again. You can read more about it here

DC gave Titans a new #1 because the old run was so bad they decided to give it a new #1 to help it get back on track.

@captainmarvel4ever: Is the new one any good? I mean it cant be much worse than Scott Lobdell, but is it legitimately entertaining?

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai: Sadly no, it's nowhere near as bad as what Lobdell was doing, and at first it was heading in the right direction, but after last issue it just kind of fell apart. So I'd say wait until the nest team to check this out.

I'm I the only one who likes Raven's new costume?

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai:

Uh.... Marvel has relaunched Fantastic Four like 3 times since Marvel Now. Daredevil been relaunched 2 times already, heck! Uncanny Avengers just got relaunched last month! Captain America and Thor got freaking relaunched just a few months ago! What the heck are you talking about "Only at DC"?

@nightfang: nah I dig it too

@trebean: I already filled him in

yea man I really liked the first couple of issues and have been pulling it,but just feels like this book isn't going anywhere story wise,personally.Might drop it if this issue doesn't show some interesting elements.I do love the characters,but the story seems to be pretty slow,for me anyways.

Great art and team but story is snoozeville

@bh6shouldhavehadsilversamurai said:

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You're joking, right?

Marvel have done that non-stop since 2012.

Daaaamn, So Beast Boy tanked a nuke.

I wish the writwr was better but I've liked worse books

The degree to which you are wrong is absurd.

Okay, to everyone who's going to repost again and again telling me that Marvel does the same thing

I do not read Marvel (although I probably should do so)

Read it again, the blast was explosive but not radioactive in nature.

Right. So he tanked a nuke.

@sodamyat: Technically yeah. -_-

....I know...thats why I said it.

Is this the first time he tanked something of that degree?