Follow

    X-Men

    Team » X-Men appears in 13416 issues.

    The X-Men are a superhero team of mutants founded by Professor Charles Xavier. They are dedicated to helping fellow mutants and sworn to protect a world that fears and hates them.

    Grant Morrison or Joss Whedon?

    Avatar image for david_james
    David_James

    210

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Poll Grant Morrison or Joss Whedon? (32 votes)

    Grant Morrison 53%
    Joss Whedon 47%

    These are the two most talked about xmen runs from the 2000s. Which one did you like more?

     • 
    Avatar image for invain
    Invain

    5240

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Grant Morrison.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5a04a566e9ae3
    deactivated-5a04a566e9ae3

    12864

    Forum Posts

    205

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    I like Astonishing more but I think New X-Men is objectively better, if only for taking risks instead of wanking Claremont.

    Avatar image for adamtrmm
    adamTRMM

    10933

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/x-men/4060-3173/forums/morrisons-new-x-men-and-whedons-astonishing-x-men-677437/

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/x-men/4060-3173/forums/why-are-grant-morrison-and-joss-whedon-so-loved-1810374/

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/x-men-155/grant-morrison-vs-joss-whedon-685429/

    Not to be an @$$ but these tend to pop up frequently.

    Avatar image for teerack
    Teerack

    10703

    Forum Posts

    1614

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 64

    Morrison was great and did a whole ton of cool different things to help get the x-men out of a massive slum, but Whedon was just so good. There has not been any writer to this day who has made the X-Men feel cool again like what Whedon did in Astonishing X-Men.

    God damn remember when Cyclops was the f**kin coolest?

    Loading Video...
    Loading Video...

    My god just watching these clips I have forgotten how good he used to write Logan to....

    Avatar image for rabbitearsblog
    Rabbitearsblog

    6721

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 79

    User Lists: 3

    Well, my answer's always going to be the same: JOSS WHEDON!!!

    Avatar image for judasnixon
    judasnixon

    12818

    Forum Posts

    699

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    Grant Morrison run was one of the smartest, out there, game changing takes on The X-men, and I Hated It!

    After ready Morrison's run, I learned you can have well written stories that you just don't like. There is nothing with Grant's X-Men, I just don't like it.

    Now Whedon run on X-men was my ****. Some people may call it Claremont wanking, and they're right. I just wish there was more Claremont wanking going around....

    Avatar image for huir
    Huir

    2449

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #7  Edited By Huir

    Grant Morrison.

    I did not like Whedon. His run was boring imo. I also don't think his style was anything like Claremont's. Whedon seemed more like Mark Millar.

    Avatar image for david_james
    David_James

    210

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #8  Edited By David_James

    @adamtrmm said:

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/x-men/4060-3173/forums/morrisons-new-x-men-and-whedons-astonishing-x-men-677437/

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/x-men/4060-3173/forums/why-are-grant-morrison-and-joss-whedon-so-loved-1810374/

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/x-men-155/grant-morrison-vs-joss-whedon-685429/

    Not to be an @$$ but these tend to pop up frequently.

    One of those threads was made by me and has nothing to do with which run was more enjoyable. The other two dont have my fancy poll. ;)

    Avatar image for adamtrmm
    adamTRMM

    10933

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @adamtrmm said:

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/x-men/4060-3173/forums/morrisons-new-x-men-and-whedons-astonishing-x-men-677437/

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/x-men/4060-3173/forums/why-are-grant-morrison-and-joss-whedon-so-loved-1810374/

    http://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/x-men-155/grant-morrison-vs-joss-whedon-685429/

    Not to be an @$$ but these tend to pop up frequently.

    One of those threads was made by me and has nothing to do with which run was more enjoyable. The other two dont have my fancy poll. ;)

    I concede.

    Avatar image for highaccuser
    HighAccuser

    9696

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Whedon easily.

    Avatar image for anopticblast
    Anopticblast

    61

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    I have to say Whedon.

    Morrison was incredible and laid the groundwork for many more X-men stories, but Whedon was simply so much fun.

    And I really liked where Cyke's costume went from his run into the utopia and heroic age.

    Avatar image for revive
    Revive

    534

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    They are both overrated, but Morrison a little less so.

    Whedon was full of bad plots and bad dialog. All of its humor fell flat imo. He turned Wolverine into a punchline and I didn't like what he did to Emma Frost and Professor X. His first arc was ridiculously average. Danger was just a bad concept and silly within itself. The Hellfire arc was the weakest out of the four. By the time I got to the last one, I just couldn't care anymore. I really don't understand the hype for this man.

    Morrison was very good in the beginning. He changed the X-Men and moved them away from the cluster that became the status quo in the late 90's. His run did also have some bad characterizations and lazy writing, but at least it actually felt like he was doing something worthwhile.

    Morrison easily did more for X-Men, and whether you like him or not, his run is a must read. Whedon is skippable and you lose almost nothing from doing so.

    Avatar image for frostyfan
    frostyfan

    13

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Whedon. I really like Morrison's run, but Joss Whedon made the X-Men feel like the X-Men again. Also, he writes the best Emma Frost.

    Avatar image for infantfinite128
    infantfinite128

    11900

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Grant Morrison. I didn't enjoy Whedon's at all. I can't stand his sense of humor and I didn't like him bringing Colossus back.

    Avatar image for selina_sublime
    Selina_Sublime

    341

    Forum Posts

    2411

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 9

    I like Whedon's run in the same way that I really loved Dennis Hopeless' X-Men: Season One--it was a nice reminder of the stories and dynamics of the past. It wasn't exactly the same, but provided a nice updated, modern look at the X-Men of yesteryear.

    But I just cannot get over how exciting Morrison made the X-Men, even if it wasn't the X-Men I'm necessarily comfortable with. His run was like adding another planet into the already vast X-Men universe, pushing characters I love into the next century and past their breaking points, while also shining a light on characters that would never have seen the light of day before the moment the leaped upon the page.

    Both runs are great and highly influential, but my vote goes to the one that lit my soul on fire.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5caa8c47e8598
    deactivated-5caa8c47e8598

    1686

    Forum Posts

    185

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Definitely Joss Whedon. I never understood the appeal of Morrison's run.

    Avatar image for msselene
    MsSelene

    518

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Both were a bit disappointing after hearing the praise for them, but I will go with Morrison. Whedon was okay, but didn't feel like anything special.

    Avatar image for outside_85
    Outside_85

    23518

    Forum Posts

    18735

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 39

    User Lists: 1

    Morrison provided more interesting material.

    Avatar image for netherlandman
    NetherlandMan

    395

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    I disliked Morrison. Whedon was okay, but not as good as some of the other writers from the 2000s.

    This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.