@johnkmccubbin91 said:
@PhoenixoftheTides said:
Agree or Disagree: The X-Men need to get more villains that have understandable differences in philosophy. Too many of their good villains are either members of the team now, dead or have had changes of heart.
Agree: They also need more distinguishing differences as well
Agree or Disagree?: Should the whole of the X-Men un-Schsim (get back together)?
Disagree: What i loved most about Schism is that the majority of titles affected by it had defined rosters in the aftermath, that may not be the case now with certain characters exceeding their stays in certain titles, but all in all, it worked out for the best. The premise for the event was definitely out of the blue, but, it worked out. I was tired of seeing the world of X-Men revolve around the infamous trio of Wolverine, Scott and Emma, it was boring and usueful characters, fan-faves, were being shafted out the window just because most writers Pre-Schism were incompetent of writing a story that did NOT revolve around the three, now, we have titles like X-Men, Uncanny X-Men and others, un-scathed by Wolverine's hairy face, that, and the said stories carry out top-notch (adjectivless X-Men) stories month in and month out.
A or D: HoM is Scott's--in fact, not even him--HoM is the combined faults of the Astonishing X-Men and the Avengers due to the fact that Wanda Maximoff gave them what they wanted (an actual Utopia where Mutants reigned supreme, something that Scott wanted anyways, but just not under Magneto's jurisdiction...greedy pig) and because some of them didn't like the supposed out-come seeing as how they'd gotten their memories back, they couldn't leave well enough alone and decided to act against it, much to Wanda's dismay. If you look at it from a certain perspective and take all the variables into account, you'll understand what i mean.
Log in to comment