Cannot seem to find any info on this. Can someone shed some light on it.

The idea is that Diana has different outfits rather than only the 'bathing suit'. So it's staying until the next permanent artist appears, then we should get a new one.

Nothing is ever permanent for wonder woman unfortunately

This design looks like a cross between a catholic priest, a muslim athlete and a circus lion tamer, it's quite atrocious.

I sure as heck hope not ... it's simply horrid. Can we just go back to her classic look? Chiang and Fabok and several others have managed to do it without hitting cheesecake level art.

Jason tabok's redesign is the best in the new 52

I sure hope not. Finch's design is butt ugly. It looks like he took 3 costumes and mashed them together into this mess.

No. Meredith said on twitter that she will have many costume changes.

I just wish Meredith Finch is taken off the book. I am only buying her books because i want to support WW as a character and will continue to do so. But the story is bad. Its so uninteresting i only remember bits and pieces of it. Some harpies attacking, an old vengeful crone, Evil Donna and was there some son of Poseidon who likes to dress up as a hobo and talks to a voice emanating from a pool of water?

Why would DC give the reins of the WW book to a novice? Because she is David Finch's wife? Is DC really sucking up to him? Come on, his art is not even that good

Yup. Fabok has the best outfit so far. I'm beginning to like Finch' art though. He just needs to improve how he draws the eyes.

i like her outfit, don't hate me for that : D

i buy her comic because of the action and damn never have i seen such a dangerous family lol

You must not buy the book at all then, because Meredith's WW is boring as hell.

@cloudzackvincent: Buying a book with a writer you dislike sends a message to the company you like the creative team. If you are in such a hurry to get finch off, then you should stop buying the title.

...Jason Fabok's design is vastly superior. I don't know what the hell they were thinking, like "lelz bro. Lez throw dis extra junk on cuz .. y not?"

@risingbean: i think WW books have been selling piss poorly anyway... But yea i see your point.

i thought there is donna troy and sorry i started with new 52 but read on the internet that donna is very important in wws world

if she gets from time to time some action is ok, it doesn't have to be like justice league

: D

and i also read detective comics vol 1+2 and heard that tony daniel did some horrible atrocious writing but i enjoyed that a lot! dark knight vol 1-4 was also fun for me.

@cloudzackvincent: I wish your post had a like button

@somayareece: haha thanks

I've never been too bogged down by costumes, and I certainly don't think this WW and SM/WW costume is going to last long. Her costumes never do.

But I do agree with the sentiment that Fabok's is better, but I think his design is more of a direct result of the cinematic costume design.

Ok i take back what i said about David finch's art. I thought his art was bad, then i took a look at the first page of the last issue and it made Finch look like Rembrandt.

sorry but is this better or worse? : D

worse :)

I seriously hope not. If anything, Fabok's design should be the permanent costume for Wonder Woman.

That's an excellent blend of the iconic aspects of Wonder Woman's costume with clear inspiration from mythological armour and practicality too.

I can't seem to understand why everyone hates so much Finch's design. Yeah, Fabok's costume design is better and should be the one that sticks around longer than any other, but the one from Finch is also good.

Finch's costume design is interesting but fabok is number 1 artist these days

@lvenger: right. I could not agree more. In fact in the last issue i could not help but notice how wonky Diana's costume looked compared to Donna's.

better to look at donna all the time lol

@cloudzackvincent: I'll admit Donna's current look isn't the worst thing to happen to her, it's not as bad as her character assassination to be sure.