@rago_beyblader said:
@dredeuced:
1) what you said is just a possibility not proof because I CAN do calculation with millisecond accuracy for 1 hr and flash CAN do calculation of maybe hours of time left with accuracy of septosecond. I don't care about surfer.
The surfer thing was just referencing a single instance. If you don't think a character's statement about how much time is elapsing counts then barely anyone in comics has FTL reactions. This is your hangup, but nearly everyone on this forum would disagree with you because your stance is nonsensical.
2) if writer shows that they went beyond lightspeed and didn't travel back in time then it is as unacceptable as writer showing 1+1 =3.
No it isn't. Literally hundreds, maybe even thousands, of characters have gone FTL without time traveling. You are placing a rule that does not exist on comics. I can show you a dozen instances of Flash going faster than light, and it being explicitly stated that he does, without him time traveling.
3) you are right His reaction time isn't relevant if he teleports at the same time Wally runs off BUT "he teleports at the same time Wally runs off" This thing is what needed to be proved and is NOT proved by your scan. Infact opposite thing is shown in your scan. He teleports in last panel and wally started running in 2nd last panel.
And don't say "he teleported at the same instant he said GO" cuz he has clearly NOT shown to be teleporting in that panel. he is shown to be teleporting in last panel.
You are missing my point. In that first page the Gambler has begun teleporting, right? Yet Wally proceeds to have a conversation with Krakkl that, explicitly stated on panel, lasts for a fraction of a second. Time has elapsed since they started the race and since the Gambler used his instantaneous teleportation. Your argument is addressing something I did not say.
4) i understand time travel and i also understand flash's time travel is nonsense. Just see Dr manhattan time travel or Trunks time travel. Those make sense. When they went back in time and try to change something happened then they end up creating alternate futures and their own actual past remain unaffected.
This is not the only way time travel works in stories. It's not a binary thing.
Now lets discuss flash time travel. In actual case flash was NOT at the end point before race started. But by time traveling he changed the past and now he WAS at the end point.
Please read this carefully - If you go back in time and change past according to your wish then at present things will already be changed according to your wish and cuz of that at present you won't time travel. And since you didn't thus you never went to past and things never changed. So you see ? It is impossible to change past by time travel. Things would remain same weather you time traveled or not. So since without time travel flash wasn't there at the end point before race starts THUS even with time travel things won't change and would remain same and flash still won't be there at the end point before race starts.
I know this holds only for the case when you are aware of that change BUT this case alone proves doing such crap by time travel is nonsense.
You are speaking nonsense. Flash didn't change things "according to his wish." He changed what he could to make the best out of the situation. Nothing Wally did precluded or prevented the action of him starting the race, gaining the speed, and going back in time. It didn't interrupt the action of all the people giving him speed (he even notes how they're all moving once he gets there). Time travel works so long as what you change does not affect the reason why you start to time travel. Things don't remain the same if he doesn't time travel -- he would lose the race and things go sour. Seriously think about what you're saying. This isn't the only time Flash has gone back in time and fixed things.
Do you think Chain Lightning, the story arc where Wally literally goes back in time to save Barry Allen from being killed by a time traveling villain, couldn't happen? Despite the fact that it falls under the same circumstance you're postulating? What you're saying doesn't apply here.
But frankly, your opinion on time travel doesn't matter, does it? That's how the story was written. That's what happened, whether you like it or not. That seems to be an ongoing problem with you.
5) "You can't say he wasn't above lightspeed in the event unless you believe he did not save those people" STOP saying this bullshit again and again. When the hell did i say wally didn't save them ?
You did. Your logic necessarily implies it.
I said that time given in your scan was wrong They didn't die cuz time given is wrong. He is under lightspeed cuz time is wrong. actual time was in seconds. Got it ? And "seconds" can mean anything on or above 2 seconds.
Because you have a bias for wanting Flash to be slower. You could just as easily say, "The statement that flash was going below lightspeed is wrong." Neither statement is more true, factual, or reasonable than the other -- other than the fact that if Wally doesn't go Lightspeed then he can't save those people, so the former is more necessary than the latter.
If you consider like 100-200 seconds then it would be under lightspeed and would support writers speed statement. On 1 side there is writer and other side there are writer AND Jesse. So my side wins :)
You have legitimately serious brain problems if you think that it takes 200 seconds for a nuke to explode. Beyond that, supporting the writer's speed statement? But it contradicts his time statement! BOTH ARE THE WRITER'S STATEMENTS. Neither has more weight than the other! It is not your divine right to decide that the time doesn't count and the lightspeed statement does.
And again, Jesse isn't the writer. Her thoughts aren't the writers -- she's also being written by a different writer, so it's not like the "writer" is interchangeable here. Your side doesn't win, and this isn't a contest about who wins or loses. Let me put it in a way I think you could understand, as you seem to have a hard time grasping basic concepts; has everything Jesse Quick ever said in her life been the direct words of the writer? Is everything she's ever said 100% true because she is the writer's mouthpiece? Of course not. This case is no different. This is Jesse Quick talking from her perspective about an event she was never at. Why is she supposed to be more trustworthy than the direct words that were in the nuke comic itself?
calculation itself is an indirect thing. Do you have direct statement for speed "he was trillions time light speed" ? do you ? NO ! I have direct statement "just under lightspeed"
Measuring something as lightspeed is calculation, dude. Lightspeed is a measured level of speed. Imagine if the statement was "At a hair's breadth short of299,792,458 meters per second." It's literally the exact same thing. Anyone could eyeball that and realize it's nonsense.
Do you have a direct statement that Wally West didn't run several million miles in 0.0001 microseconds? Because I have a direct statement that, "0.0001 microseconds, half a million koreans seem to materialize on a hilltop 35 miles away from the blast." Your logic, no matter how you phrase it, always goes both ways. The writer wrote both things, he said both things, you don't get to decide which one counts and which one doesn't. He was very, very specific, too, so it's not like it was an accident.
if preferance don't determine fact then why the hell you prefer distance time statement instead of speed ? Again, he saved all people being under lightspeed in several seconds. You time is wrong. How many times i have to repeat it ?
If what Wally did was capable of being done at less than lightspeed then I would not have a problem saying he was under lightspeed -- but that is the problem. It is impossible for Wally to save half a million people before a nuke goes off without going more than lightspeed. You can not go the distance he did before the nuke encompassed the whole city.
And here you are, backtracking. If he did it in several seconds, it's still faster than lightspeed! Several seconds is not enough time to run 35 miles 500,000 times. It's not enough to run that distance 50,000 times. You can repeat it all you want, it doesn't make it possible.
Before you respond to any of this, answer this EXACT question: How is it possible that Wally runs 17,500,000 miles in several seconds without going faster than light? How is it possible for Wally to run 17,500,000 miles BEFORE a nuke can kill a single person after detonating without breaking lightspeed?
at least i have Jesse's statement which is still better than nothing that you have.
What I have is the feat. The feat is not possible at less than lightspeed. Jesse's statement doesn't even say he was less than lightspeed -- it says he did it in several seconds. I have already said to you that even if we accept Jesse's statement as fact, several seconds is not enough time to do what Wally did while still going below lightspeed.But you ignored me. You acted like Jesse's statement magically changes the time given originally (with very dubious logic) but then ignore the fact that Jesse's time doesn't change the argument, unless you think "several seconds," means "several hundred seconds," or that it actually takes several hundred seconds for a nuke to cover a city.
Log in to comment