I LIKE the old Sam Raimi trilogy, but there's a difference between "liking" and "the best" (liking is subjective, what i like may not be what you like, but the best stays the best). The actors were awesome in the old trilogy, but not too over the top. Take Toby Magguire for instance, NOBODY knew who he was. It wasn't like Scarlet Johannsen or Nicholas Cage in another lead role, and he wasn't "pretty", more of a Charlie Cox, with odd features and the least likely demeanour you'd expect in a hero. That works for Spider-Man. For every one of those though, you had a Kirsten Dunst, who had acted from childhood, beside greats like Tom Cruise, Bradd Pitt, Banderas, Robin Williams, before she was maybe 16, AND son of Tom Hanks. That girl played the little girl in Little Women. In addition to that, we had Topher Grace as Venom, depicting the antagonist to both Spider Man AND to Peter Parker. One (the alien symbiote) was repelled by Spider-Man, one had beef with Peter. However Venom wasn't as BIG as Venom should have been, nor as COOL as Venom should REALLY have been. Nobody in the old trilogy really looked cool. Big fan of Willem Dafoe here, and he played that villain PRETTY well. But the OLD trilogy truly rules because of the recurring minor players like Bruce Campbell, aka Autolicus from Xena, aka Ash, from Evil Dead, aka Sam Raimi's FIRST business partner ever and lifelong friend.
However, like i said, liking and the actual, uncontested "BEST" are 2 different things, and Andrew Garfield's ASM was much cooler. First of all, the new team fixed a lot of errors made in the old trilogy, like fixing the tag from "Spider-Man" to "AMAZING Spider-Man". If you go back and check the long standing Spider Man comics, they used the tag "Amazing". All Marvel titles had some adjective like that, ex: the INCREDIBLE Hulk, UNCANNY X-Men, "Fantastic" in Fantastic Four is already an adjective. Furthermore, like Superman started out in "Action Comics #1", Spidey started out in "Amazing Fantasy" (number was probably 13). The "Amazing" tagline is pretty important, basically essential to the CLASSIC Spidey outfit. Also, they brought back the spider threads. They put in maybe too much science and had too many spiders in one ceremonious scene. Sam Raimi kept it simple by showing some kids at a museum or something, taking pictures, fooling around, not paying attention, when a loose Spider crept up and bit the kid in a horror inducing, pretty slow but not so musically ceremonious scene. That's what Spidey comics did, follow a strict formula where the protagonist started out at a natural state, going about his business and enjoying life (unless he's trying to pay bills and make ends meet) All real life. ASM, in that way, gave the origin too much FATE factor and ruined certain things. ASM's Goblin was WAAAAAY better than James Franco's Goblin. Love Franco, but Franco's brooding wasn't enough brooding. This guy actually made you kind of feel, you could really empathize with this villain. If you follow the games that accompanied the movies though, after Connors became Lizard, (and Spidey got his powers through the same chemical stuff?) the waste went down into the sewerage system and there were new mutant creatures crawling around in New York City sewers. That adds to, but changes Spider-Man mythos, but if you want anything awesome about that, think of the NINJA TURTLES! Well, the Turtles CAN'T exist in the Marvel U., because they fight the Foot, and Marvel has the parent Hand, and because New York sewers in the Marvel U. are taken up by mutants called Morlocks. Two families can't live in the same house. However, it could create Morlocks, possible, but then the MCU is different from regular old Marvel U as well. (i don't think Spidey's even IN the MCU). But the DEATH SCENES were what really made ASM 2 the best
How so? Glad you asked! (ok, so no one asked). So how many people died in Spider-Man movies? (main characters, who we really saw die) Gwen Stacey was the last one to go, her father died too (and if anyone thinks someone played by Dennis Leary s a MINOR character, you'd be wrong). Besides, in Cpt. Stacey's case, we're not really looking at his own death, but at the EFFECTS caused on the remaining people by that death. Let the dead stay dead, it's the living that.... has to put up with death. So counting from the bottom, Ben Reilly died, but then he HAD to die as we wouldn't have had the story start without him. There would be no "Spider-Man" without Ben Reilly's death, and his last words. That's the guy who triggered him into doing what he does. Then there was Reilly's killer, or the thief at the wrestling match, but hey, pretty inconsequential. The first major finale death is Dafoe's death as Goblin. Now, Willem Dafoe has a reputation for death scenes. There's a chance he was chosen with that in mind. This villain did have a sensitive side (and if he didn't have a "sensitive" side, at least we see him changing through the course of the film, and at the very beginning, in his limo, we see a nice father/scientist figure in Norman Osborne chatting up Peter about science and University. The villain was a friend of Peter's, even if he had his own faults in personal relationships with his son.) So by the end, villains had died, but none of the heroes, except for Ben Reilly, whose death doesn't REALLY count because it had to happen. Kind of sad, and definitely a tragic ending because Harry sees Spider-Man with his dead father and assumes the worst. Both Aunt May and MJ almost die, as hostages taken by Goblin to scare Peter, or manipulate Peter into joining him, but they didn't. Then we had Octavius, also a big scientist who talks with Peter over breakfast or a glass of juice. I've had a similar convo with someone I sort of looked up to, over his breakfast, so I can understand how that would feel. Later in the movie, like right at the end, he died. We see him going crazy, we understand WHY he did what he did, (and by that i mean HE SACRIFICED HIS WIFE IN THE NAME OF RESEARCH, AND HE WAS ALREADY EVIL, AND HE DOESN'T DESERVE NO PITY FOR THAT!) Mary Jane ALMOST died, but didn't. once again. In the 3rd movie, James Franco, longstanding best friend of Spider-Man's who momentarily goes haywire but manages to turn to the good side by the end of the movie, died. Once again, MJ is spared after a bit of heavy torment. Actually, that last movie was hell for MJ, all throughout. BUT SHE DIDN'T DIE, which was all fine because MJ, just like Lois Lane, is ESSENTIAL for the longstanding mythos of Spider-Man. She's the girl he gets married to, and she's the girl who survives to the end of the line (after being introduced before Gwen, but later than Betty Brant). Gwen, not so much. Now, the way "death" and life is treated in ASM, is COMPLETELY different! People do die. Good guys do die. If you enter a war-zone, either on your own free will or by force, you know you have a risk of dying. You take that risk of dying. Now, choosing to take part and not being kidnapped and playing damsel-in-distress every other day opens up a whole other dimension of feminist philosophy/ethics, i realize. But forgetting that,... Spider Man SAVES the villain, but gets his girlfriend's father killed. Cpt. Stacey advices him to stay away from his girl, but after some heartache, he decides he could have everything he wants. So he gives it a chance. And ends up getting Gwen killed as well. Technically, like i said, she chooses to get into the mix, and i believe Gwen did come up with the plan that saved NYC. It wasn't Peter's fault. And as sad as it is, Gwen DOES die in the comics, so it's ok for Gwen to die, speaking out of comics mythos here. Gwen's contribution to Spider Man's life was basically just going in the fridge (http://comicvine.gamespot.com/women-in.../4015-43763/). But see, the way death is treated, the chaos in a major char's death, the shock value, how the audience/viewer feels after it,..... how there's no sugar-coated bullshit about ALMOST falling off a rooftop, 3 scenes every movie, before being miraculously rescued by a thread, (literally "hanging on by a thread")
Log in to comment