"But Superman can't control fire or ice, he can simple blast people with either heat or cold, which fits better with Blast Power."
then there shouldn't be both "blast power" and "ice control" on his list. i just don't think the term "blast" is good fit for superman, because there is no concussive force involved in his heat vision. if cyclops shot a pile of bricks with his blast, they would be broken and tossed all over, while a shot of superman's heat vision to even a house of cards would not knock it over, but simply raise the surface temperature of the paper until a fire started. my original qualm was with this distinction, if you can think of a cleaner description of his breath than minor "ice control," im open to it.
were a lot of them really made up? im sure you know more about the xmen universe than i do, but i just assumed that most of them were real, just without explicitly saying their names. like i thought that guy was "spike" or something, who i have seen introduced in recent cartoons i think. idk.
teen wolf is one of the great classics of this or any generation. Styles? urban surfing? the montage where he is suddenly the coolest kid in school, high fiving everyone in the hallway with his varsity jacket on? all amazing.
VENOM for sure. I don't know about you guys but i was disappointed with the 2nd movie, as well as the casting of topher grace as eddie brock, but i still have faith that the 3rd will be awesome.
right, i agree completely. thats why i suggested "pyrotechnic," since its already a power (i'm not proposing creating a NEW one just for superman). someone also had already suggested that "pyrotechnic" be changed to "heat control" in order to be in the same vein as "ice control," which superman has. i think "heat control" would be a good fit, and should have an ample group of characters already (pyro, human torch, etc). Post Edited:2006-12-15 19:06:34
well we don't really want redundancies either do we? if "blast power" is the general consensus i guess i'll just leave it at that, i was just suggesting a more precise distinction.
Log in to comment