Lyrad

This user has not updated recently.

379 0 5 19
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Lyrad's forum posts

Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Lyrad
Kurrent said:
Lyrad said: I never played the first one, is it worth buying befor ethe second one is released??And to answer ... [more]

Really??

I thought it looked like a simple button bashing game, so I avoided it.

But...... Xbox is pretty dry for games at the moment, so I think I'll purchase it on your recomendation.

If you'd just like to forward me your address in case I don't like it, I'll send the bill to you.   Haha!
Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Lyrad

I never played the first one, is it worth buying befor ethe second one is released??

And to answer the topic question, Spider-Woman has to be in there.  From what I have read, MUA2 focuses on the Civil War Story, if they do a third game, it may just be about Secret Invasion.    So they have to put Jessy Drew in there.  Also, she's a mint character.  
Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Lyrad

God, I hope they don't mess this up.  PLEASE DON'T MESS THIS UP!
Ryan Reynolds, I'm not a fan of him,  he's..... Lets face it.... A cheeseball!!..... But, he was perfect as Wade in Wolverine.  He did a top job playing the part, but then, as we all know, it went to sh*t when they created Deadpool.  Why? WHY did they do it?

Anyway, in an interview with Reynolds, he briefly mentioned that the Deadpool movie will have NOTHING to do with the pathetic version of him in Wolverine. Kinda like how the second Hulk movie had nothing to do with the first.  So fingers crossed....... It has the potential to be a great watch!

Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Lyrad
PrinceIMC said:
The way I understand it is that he was the start of the mutant people as a race. Lots of ... [more]

Oh yeah, I didn't think it through, of course Wolverine is older than Namor. But thanks, I got my question answered.  I can go on about my normal life now.  Woo Hoo!
Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Lyrad
inferiorego said:
Lyrad said: Ahhhhhhhhhhh!............... Thank you....... I understand now.But the concept is flawed.    Characters in comics refer to Namor being the ... [more]

Really?   I miss read then.   Thanks for clearing that up.
Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Lyrad

Ahhhhhhhhhhh!............... Thank you....... I understand now.

But the concept is flawed.    Characters in comics refer to Namor being the first Mutant.... I can't remember which comic I read, but the scene was in a class room (i'm thinking House of M) the teacher asks the the kids who the first mutant was and one of the kids says Namor and the kids knows all about Namor because her Mum has a thing for him.  The teacher tells the kid she is correct and explains he was reported in 1939.
So the characters in this comic even though they are reffering to Namor in the Marvel Universe, they are also reffering to our world (the readers point of veiw) as 1939 being the first time we read about Mutants.

Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Lyrad
aztek_the_lost said:
Selene is a mutant and she's even older than Apocalypse, which is why he's title as "The First One" is ... [more]

Namor is the first Mutant in a Marvel comic????

I don't understand??   Is Apocolypse not originally Marvel?  Or am I just being a retard by not understanding?
Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Lyrad
Anderson: Agent of SMITH said:
I think I like Deadpool's a bit better. I think it looks a bit simpler. Spawn is pretty badass, but ... [more]

I kind of agree.  Spawn looks quality..... But his costume is always a little over done.   Deadpool's costume is a lot simpler but it just works.... He always looks quality.  I'm leaning on the Deadpool costume.
Avatar image for lyrad
Lyrad

379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Lyrad

Hello everyone.

I'm new to this site, can't believe I've only just discovered it.... Better late than never I suppose.

Anyway, my first topic.

I'm a massive Marvel fan but I do not pretend to be an expert on all things Marvel.
Could someone please enlighten me on who is the first Mutant?

Now, Prince Namor..... He is supposedly the first Mutant. The story goes that in 1939, he came accross two divers in need of help, he saved them by taking them to the surface, just off the coast of New York, only to discover a whole (above surface) world. He went on to explore this new world to find humans at war...... Became friends with Captain America and helped out. The rest is history.

Now...... Apocolypse??....... Apocolypse is the part in this topic that I don't fully understand. His powers have never truly been explained as they seem to differ when ever he pops up.  Super strength, near indestructable, able to draw energy from other sources.... The list goes on..... In simple terms.... He's well hard!!!   Time travel is one of his many powers. Apocolypse's back ground is ancient Egypt, he is over 5000 years old which tells me he should be the first Mutant..... So why is it Namor is always reffered to as the original Mutant??