@beast_in_the_shadows
I like what you said about all sentient beings having equal rights. I assume most would classify only humans as sentient, but I would take it a step further than most in my belief all animals, regardless of species, should be entitled certain rights.
I think the biggest flaw with this argument is that of "human rights", assuming that rights need to be given only to "humans". If mutants are a separate species, I don't think that should deny them rights, just as I don't think Lockheed or Louis (a cat my family adopted) can be denied rights. For any being that possesses consciousness, sentience, and thus the ability to have motivations, perceptions, intentions, etc., I believe rights should be given. The opportunities relevant to the rights of those beings may differ - for example, dogs don't need the right to public education, nor do mutant healers need the right to free health care. But the argument of "human rights" assumes that humans are superior to all other animal species, that because we are the apex predator, we have rights and others don't. This is why I love the X-men mythology - it challenges the notion of superiority and hierarchy, by suggesting a being more powerful than us humans.
I don't mean to just focus on the rights of nonhuman animals, but that was to illustrate the concept of supposed superiority as it relates to rights. We can also look more specifically in the animal kingdom to strictly focus on humans. If mutants are humans, then they should be granted the same rights. But I personally do not believe species should determine which rights are given, just like I don't believe it should be determined by race, sex, or sexual orientation.
Just my beliefs. :)
Log in to comment