Follow

    Marvel

    Publisher »

    Formerly known by names including "Atlas" and "Timely", Marvel Entertainment is the publisher of comic books featuring iconic characters and teams such as the Fantastic Four, Spider-Man, the Avengers, the X-Men, Iron Man, the Hulk, Thor, Captain America and Daredevil. Currently owned by the Walt Disney Company, Marvel is one of the "Big Two" comic publishers along with DC Comics.

    Who's the smartest marvel character ?

    Avatar image for realitywarper
    RealityWarper

    12333

    Forum Posts

    124

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #1  Edited By RealityWarper

    All is in the title.

    Avatar image for powerherc
    PowerHerc

    86191

    Forum Posts

    211478

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #2  Edited By PowerHerc

    Mr. Fantastic - non-abstract 
    One Above All - abstract
    Avatar image for pumpkinbomb
    PumpkinBomb

    501

    Forum Posts

    13

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #3  Edited By PumpkinBomb

    Valeria Richards is smarter than her father.

    Avatar image for fresh0133
    Fresh0133

    534

    Forum Posts

    2711

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 32

    User Lists: 1

    #4  Edited By Fresh0133

    ^^  This, she's crazy smart, she just keeps it a pretty good seceret, even from her dad.

    Avatar image for reactor
    reactor

    5074

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #5  Edited By reactor

    You know, with all the geniuses on Earth (comicverse) and all the crazy-advanced tech they have, it really is amazing that the world isn't more advanced. They could get rid of crime, sickness, wars, even establish a absolute world-monarchy (meh, I would, at least).
     
    But anyways, I'd say it's impossible to say (unless an official source says so) who is the smartest in the Marvel Universe. Reed, Tony, Hank and Bruce are among my top choices. Tony is more of a technologist, mathematics, and engineering. Bruce is more of a biologist, chemist, and physicist. Hank is really into the quantum physics, artificial intelligence and obviously pym particles. And then we have Reed, who is seemingly an amalgamation of the others (he's smart in everything).
     
    So, I guess I'd say Reed is the smartest, excluding his daughter.

    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #6  Edited By roadbuster
    @RealityWarper said:
    " All is in the title. "
    Who is the smartest real person and why?
     
    "Smart" is a pretty general term and we need some criteria to work with...
    Avatar image for reactor
    reactor

    5074

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #7  Edited By reactor
    @Mainline said:
    " @RealityWarper said:
    " All is in the title. "
    Who is the smartest real person and why? "Smart" is a pretty general term and we need some criteria to work with... "
    Personally, I though it was pretty evident that he meant academically speaking. When people say "smart", 9 time out of 10, that's generally what they're referring to. They usually specify if they mean smart as to cunning, manipulative, etc.
    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #8  Edited By roadbuster
    @Reactor said:

    " @Mainline said:

    " @RealityWarper said:
    " All is in the title. "
    Who is the smartest real person and why? "Smart" is a pretty general term and we need some criteria to work with... "
    Personally, I though it was pretty evident that he meant academically speaking. When people say "smart", 9 time out of 10, that's generally what they're referring to. They usually specify if they mean smart as to cunning, manipulative, etc. "
    I don't think that's obvious and not necessarily what I would consider smart.  Academics is as much about discipline, rote memorization, and scope of knowledge as it is about intelligence.  A person could be extremely successful academic with an eidetic memory and performance enhancing drugs without having the traits associated with intelligence, innovation, reasoning, etc.  Book "smarts" are not street "smarts', etc.  Experience, factual knowledge, short-term memory, abstract reasoning, visual-spatial abilities, common sense, social aptitude, cultural adaptation, interpersonal skills, creativity and imagination, etc. can all be non-mutually exclusive tests for intelligence or "smarts".  Given such a multitude of relevant factors it's a little difficult to proclaim anyone the "smartest" in a linear sense, which is why I asked for express criteria. 
     
    If all you use is the ability to process information, the Flash family may be well up on the scale, if you add memory to the test Bart suddenly soars ahead.  If you demand experience, application, or technology be an aspect you exclude youths like Valeria or anyone who's technological sophistication does not exceed a certain level- thus Leonardo DaVinci would not be as "smart" as Rhino... and frankly, Rhino would probably be able to do better academically than DaVinci on the same objective test unless you allow them both the same opportunity to learn in which case the test is not objective academic performance but academic ability / potential. 
     
    So it's far from a straight forward "evident" question.
    Avatar image for reactor
    reactor

    5074

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By reactor
    @Mainline said:
    " @Reactor said:

    " @Mainline said:

    " @RealityWarper said:
    " All is in the title. "
    Who is the smartest real person and why? "Smart" is a pretty general term and we need some criteria to work with... "
    Personally, I though it was pretty evident that he meant academically speaking. When people say "smart", 9 time out of 10, that's generally what they're referring to. They usually specify if they mean smart as to cunning, manipulative, etc. "
    I don't think that's obvious and not necessarily what I would consider smart.  Academics is as much about discipline, rote memorization, and scope of knowledge as it is about intelligence.  A person could be extremely successful academic with an eidetic memory and performance enhancing drugs without having the traits associated with intelligence, innovation, reasoning, etc.  Book "smarts" are not street "smarts', etc.  Experience, factual knowledge, short-term memory, abstract reasoning, visual-spatial abilities, common sense, social aptitude, cultural adaptation, interpersonal skills, creativity and imagination, etc. can all be non-mutually exclusive tests for intelligence or "smarts".  Given such a multitude of relevant factors it's a little difficult to proclaim anyone the "smartest" in a linear sense, which is why I asked for express criteria. 
     
    If all you use is the ability to process information, the Flash family may be well up on the scale, if you add memory to the test Bart suddenly soars ahead.  If you demand experience, application, or technology be an aspect you exclude youths like Valeria or anyone who's technological sophistication does not exceed a certain level- thus Leonardo DaVinci would not be as "smart" as Rhino... and frankly, Rhino would probably be able to do better academically than DaVinci on the same objective test unless you allow them both the same opportunity to learn in which case the test is not objective academic performance but academic ability / potential.  So it's far from a straight forward "evident" question. "
    Uh, wow... okay? In that case, just give your opinions on different "types" of intellect, and the top contenders in said fields of your choosing. When it's ambiguous, just go with what you want.
    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #10  Edited By roadbuster
    @Reactor: I'm making a point... that as silly as it is to claim any human on this earth or in history is the "smartest" without criteria yet somehow when it comes to comics it we can begin ranking them such that we can claim someone is the "7th Smartest Person In The World" without stating how that ranking came to be.
     
    That said, "smartest" in the above sense tends to suggest just general "innovative problem solving"... (so no reliance on time travel, reality warping, magic, omniscience, etc. in order to retrieve or achieve the answer) However, that's still incredibly vague.  Imagine applying that in the real world... do you go to Bill Gates because he has resources or someone allegedly smarter but who lives under a park bench?  How much does fame and notoriety play into supposed "smarts"?
    Avatar image for drkhwk2001
    drkhwk2001

    4570

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #11  Edited By drkhwk2001

    Banner or Doom.

    Avatar image for n7_normandy
    N7_Normandy

    2504

    Forum Posts

    733

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 6

    #12  Edited By N7_Normandy

    What about Amadeus ?

    Avatar image for realitywarper
    RealityWarper

    12333

    Forum Posts

    124

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #13  Edited By RealityWarper

    @mainline : Yeah I agree in your point of view maybe I see intelligence as general "innovative problem solving" or a "creative power". Reed Richards is able to see things that Wolverine can't.

    Avatar image for weaponxxx
    weaponxxx

    429

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #14  Edited By weaponxxx
    @Mainline: 
    You are absolutely correct. The disambiguation of what it means to be intelligent and distinction between different aspects of intelligence is a huge roadblock for the ranking system to overcome. Memorization, Analysis, Abstract Reasoning, Innovation, Practicality, and Determination are all extremely important to consider. As are other aspects including Wisdom, Shrewdness, Higher Cognitive Function, etc... It is incredibly difficult to compare two human beings who excel in different areas. We even have to consider other alternatives such as the Vision or Ultron for their raw processing power, or Kang for his knowledge of the future(s), or even Deadpool for his breaking down the fourth wall (had to fit it in there). But when a single person excels in all aspects of intelligence simultaneously and succeeds in bypassing the ambiguity of a complex and many layered question such as "who is the smartest there is?" then that ambiguity only serves to highlight and galvanize his or her supremacy over all others....
     
    So in summation....Doom curbstomp.
    Avatar image for batman_is_god
    batman_is_god

    1192

    Forum Posts

    92

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #15  Edited By batman_is_god

    Dr. Doom 
     
    Reed is smart, but only as science goes. Dr. Doom is smarter in all other meanings of the word.
    Avatar image for firewrkninja
    firewrkninja

    384

    Forum Posts

    544

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #16  Edited By firewrkninja
    @Mainline said:
    " @Reactor said:

    " @Mainline said:

    " @RealityWarper said:
    " All is in the title. "
    Who is the smartest real person and why? "Smart" is a pretty general term and we need some criteria to work with... "
    Personally, I though it was pretty evident that he meant academically speaking. When people say "smart", 9 time out of 10, that's generally what they're referring to. They usually specify if they mean smart as to cunning, manipulative, etc. "
    I don't think that's obvious and not necessarily what I would consider smart.  Academics is as much about discipline, rote memorization, and scope of knowledge as it is about intelligence.  A person could be extremely successful academic with an eidetic memory and performance enhancing drugs without having the traits associated with intelligence, innovation, reasoning, etc.  Book "smarts" are not street "smarts', etc.  Experience, factual knowledge, short-term memory, abstract reasoning, visual-spatial abilities, common sense, social aptitude, cultural adaptation, interpersonal skills, creativity and imagination, etc. can all be non-mutually exclusive tests for intelligence or "smarts".  Given such a multitude of relevant factors it's a little difficult to proclaim anyone the "smartest" in a linear sense, which is why I asked for express criteria. 
     
    If all you use is the ability to process information, the Flash family may be well up on the scale, if you add memory to the test Bart suddenly soars ahead.  If you demand experience, application, or technology be an aspect you exclude youths like Valeria or anyone who's technological sophistication does not exceed a certain level- thus Leonardo DaVinci would not be as "smart" as Rhino... and frankly, Rhino would probably be able to do better academically than DaVinci on the same objective test unless you allow them both the same opportunity to learn in which case the test is not objective academic performance but academic ability / potential.  So it's far from a straight forward "evident" question. "
    I think you are right but Flash would not be up on that scale because the question is who is the smartest marvel character
    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #17  Edited By roadbuster
    @firewrkninja said:
    "I think you are right but Flash would not be up on that scale because the question is who is the smartest marvel character "
    You're confusing scale with rank.  A scale is means of measurement... like a ruler where Flash represented a notch for the purposes of the illustration.  "Smartest" is a rank as to who amongst a select set is highest on that scale.
    Avatar image for son_of_magnus
    Son_of_Magnus

    15463

    Forum Posts

    5517

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 15

    #18  Edited By Son_of_Magnus

    Earth bound Reed or Doom all around Thanos

    Avatar image for theodore
    Theodore

    3607

    Forum Posts

    494

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 4

    #19  Edited By Theodore

    Reed Richards

    Avatar image for n7_normandy
    N7_Normandy

    2504

    Forum Posts

    733

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 6

    #20  Edited By N7_Normandy
    @N7_Normandy said:
    " What about Amadeus ? "
    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #21  Edited By roadbuster
    @weaponxxx said:
    " @Mainline:  Kang for his knowledge of the future(s), or even Deadpool for his breaking down the fourth wall (had to fit it in there). But when a single person excels in all aspects of intelligence simultaneously and succeeds in bypassing the ambiguity of a complex and many layered question such as "who is the smartest there is?" then that ambiguity only serves to highlight and galvanize his or her supremacy over all others....  So in summation....Doom curbstomp. "
    The OP refined his criteria above by saying "innovative problem solver" or "creative power" citing my exclusions of extra-temporal knowledge, traditional magic, and reality warping as relevant criteria.  Therefore Kang's future knowledge is excluded (for the OP's purposes a fourth grader from the future is not automatically "smarter" than a fourth grader from the present simply due to access to more advanced knowledge) as would be Deadpool (secret knowledge bestowed by writer fiat would not count as a character innovation or creativity- or, another way of putting it, having "security clearance" doesn't make you "smarter" for the purposes of the OP... being allowed to see more of the chessboard is not "smarts"). 
     
    I'm skeptical about Doom.  He already "cheats" by using time travel, traditional (rather than innovative) magic, and reality warpers (brainwashing and betrothing Scarlet Witch) which could be construed as recognizing his power, knowledge, and victory deficit and shoring it up... but "solving" interim problems while failing to achieve the ultimate one (the whole reason he feels the need for all these upgrades and contingencies) hurts his rank in my opinion.  The emphasis on innovation and creation is to say "Strip these men of their powers and resources and perhaps even memories... who achieves [BLANK] first?"  That's why cosmic omniscient beings cannot be ranked (we've never seen their innovative ability outside of their total knowledge).  Applied to Doom- bring him back to basics without all his acquired add-ons- and Reed beat him, the very essence of their rivalry.
    Avatar image for rogue_mar1e
    rogue_mar1e

    20181

    Forum Posts

    22668

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #22  Edited By rogue_mar1e

    Doctor Doom .

    No Caption Provided
    Avatar image for eternal_chaos
    Eternal Chaos

    23190

    Forum Posts

    562

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #23  Edited By Eternal Chaos

    I'm willing to make a leap here and say that honestly, Peter Parker can probably be in the top tier. He's made it his business to figure out how to outsmart a lot of different people. He just doesn't get as much credit as he should and I for one believe that's because he isn't as flashy as Reed, or Tony or even Hank. Provide him with the same tools as those three and I say he can do it. The man made web-shooters from practically nothing and outsmarted Reed Richards in one of their crossovers.

    Avatar image for pumpkinbomb
    PumpkinBomb

    501

    Forum Posts

    13

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #24  Edited By PumpkinBomb
    @Eternal Chaos: 
    While he is quite clever, he's invented all of two things in fifteen years. I wouldn't give him an IQ much higher than the 160s.
    Avatar image for eternal_chaos
    Eternal Chaos

    23190

    Forum Posts

    562

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #25  Edited By Eternal Chaos
    @PumpkinBomb: Give him the proper resources and I see that change.
    Avatar image for chaos_soul
    chaos-soul

    1516

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #26  Edited By chaos-soul

    the living tribunal lol jk but i want to say doom or thanos 
    would eternity count?
    Avatar image for pumpkinbomb
    PumpkinBomb

    501

    Forum Posts

    13

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #27  Edited By PumpkinBomb
    @Eternal Chaos: 
    I think being incredibly smart would only hurt the character. He'd lose... well, credibility.
    Avatar image for firewrkninja
    firewrkninja

    384

    Forum Posts

    544

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #28  Edited By firewrkninja
    @Mainline said:
    " @firewrkninja said:
    "I think you are right but Flash would not be up on that scale because the question is who is the smartest marvel character "
    You're confusing scale with rank.  A scale is means of measurement... like a ruler where Flash represented a notch for the purposes of the illustration.  "Smartest" is a rank as to who amongst a select set is highest on that scale. "
    I was just using the same word as him/her so that there wouldn't be any misunderstandings 
    @Mainline said
    If all you use is the ability to process information, the Flash family may be well up on the scale, if you add memory to the test Bart suddenly soars ahead.
    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #29  Edited By roadbuster
    @firewrkninja: That person was me.  You were trying to correct me by saying Flash would not be on that scale.  I was trying to correct you by saying I used the word scale specifically because a scale is a measure while a rank applies to a set. 
     
    For example... "Who is the best basketball player in this room?" is a rank (smartest in Marvel)... but you can say, "Tom is the only one who beat Dick and Dick has beaten everyone else." even if Dick is not in the room (Flash not in Marvel)... here, Dick is used as a measure or scale, he is not part of the set of people in the room.  If you came along and said, "I think you're right but Dick is not in this room."  Most would realize the critique didn't make sense.
    Avatar image for eisforextinction
    EisforExtinction

    2013

    Forum Posts

    2742

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 68

    User Lists: 6

    #30  Edited By EisforExtinction

    Even though it's probably Richards I gotta hype my boy Banner.

    Avatar image for firewrkninja
    firewrkninja

    384

    Forum Posts

    544

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #31  Edited By firewrkninja
    @Mainline said:
    " @firewrkninja: That person was me.  You were trying to correct me by saying Flash would not be on that scale.  I was trying to correct you by saying I used the word scale specifically because a scale is a measure while a rank applies to a set. 
     
    For example... "Who is the best basketball player in this room?" is a rank (smartest in Marvel)... but you can say, "Tom is the only one who beat Dick and Dick has beaten everyone else." even if Dick is not in the room (Flash not in Marvel)... here, Dick is used as a measure or scale, he is not part of the set of people in the room.  If you came along and said, "I think you're right but Dick is not in this room."  Most would realize the critique didn't make sense. "

    I have been thoroughly owned. I can't think of a comeback except for the fact that in your example you said Tom (???) beat Dick (Flash). Whereas in your earlier statement you said the Flash (Dick) family would be high up on the scale. You never said someone was better than flash you just said Flash was good. that would be like asking "Who is the best baseball player in the neighborhood?" and someone saying "Timmy Seagorcal is pretty good." even though Timmy Seagorcal lives in a different hemisphere. 
     
    I think that made sense
    PS: sorry, didn't realize it was you, wasn't really paying attention to that.
    Avatar image for roadbuster
    roadbuster

    1159

    Forum Posts

    1966

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #32  Edited By roadbuster
    @firewrkninja: No worries, but I disagree with your illustration.  If you read the original post's context, the point was saying "How do you measure smarts?"  Thus it makes sense to cite various examples of those who excel in various measures to highlight the differences between measures.  It's like saying, "Who's the greatest basketball player on the Celtics?"  and I said, "What makes a player the best?  Being a team player like Kidd?  Being dominant at the post like Shaq?  Being versatile like Kobe?"  Then saying "Those players aren't on the Celtics!"  Flash was raised as an example of information processing as a measure of smarts, which was to help clarify whether or not that was applicable criteria... whether any of the Celtics are or are not better isn't really relevant.
    Avatar image for gambit1024
    Gambit1024

    10217

    Forum Posts

    47

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 9

    #33  Edited By Gambit1024

    I'm inclined to say Dr. Doom, but this can change with the direction they're taking Valeria in. Anyone who just walks into Dooms palace and talks to him like she did has got to be pretty damn intelligent. 

    Avatar image for darkcloakx
    darkcloakx

    788

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #34  Edited By darkcloakx

    black panther.

    Avatar image for firewrkninja
    firewrkninja

    384

    Forum Posts

    544

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #35  Edited By firewrkninja
    @Mainline: i disagree with your illustration of you disagreeing with my illustration of your first illustration.
     
    In my last comment where i start with "i have been thoroughly owned", I think i was talking about how you had added an element into your first example (Tom from the Tom and Dick thing) not into the first thing you said (about flash). (although i did make it quite unclear) i just meant that your first example way back in the day (not the first thing you said but your first example) had:
    @firewrkninja said:
    ...Tom (???)...
    and you didn't really explain who he was supposed to represent.
     
    in a nut shell, i wasn't saying your "flash" post made no sense i was basically trying (trying!) to say that Tom wasnt anything in that example. 

     I hope that wasn't too hard to understand i kinda wrote it really quick because im starving and want to go eat something.
    Avatar image for primebonnick
    primebonnick

    4330

    Forum Posts

    1731

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #36  Edited By primebonnick

    Thanos is the smartest .
    But for earth in no particular order
    Beast
    reed richards
    black panther
    Bruce Banner
    High Evolutionary
    Cho
    hank pym
    tony stark
    the leader
    Dr Doom

    Avatar image for misternegative
    misternegative

    32

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #37  Edited By misternegative

    I think the term smart is far too broad a term, each super-scientist (Doom, Pym, Richards etc.) has their own specialist field though one of the  most intelligent members of the MU in my mind is Pym. Then again Maybe i'm biased :)

    Avatar image for ripcurl
    ripcurl

    546

    Forum Posts

    51

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #38  Edited By ripcurl

    Thanos.

    Avatar image for soulstealer
    Soulstealer

    828

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #39  Edited By Soulstealer

    @Reactor said:

    You know, with all the geniuses on Earth (comicverse) and all the crazy-advanced tech they have, it really is amazing that the world isn't more advanced. They could get rid of crime, sickness, wars, even establish a absolute world-monarchy (meh, I would, at least). But anyways, I'd say it's impossible to say (unless an official source says so) who is the smartest in the Marvel Universe. Reed, Tony, Hank and Bruce are among my top choices. Tony is more of a technologist, mathematics, and engineering. Bruce is more of a biologist, chemist, and physicist. Hank is really into the quantum physics, artificial intelligence and obviously pym particles. And then we have Reed, who is seemingly an amalgamation of the others (he's smart in everything). So, I guess I'd say Reed is the smartest, excluding his daughter.

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ReedRichardsIsUseless

    Avatar image for enosisik
    Enosisik

    1172

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #40  Edited By Enosisik

    Thanos has been shown to outsmart Dr.Doom more than once. Reed and Doom are about even. Pym , Banner,Leader Egghead and Cho and Stark are all about even with Beast right under them.

    Avatar image for lambdacubed
    lambdacubed

    14

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Using only basic earthling creatures it is generally accepted that the smartest is Reed Richards. I could see arguments for Stark or Doom though. Doom is ... well Doom and managed to become the great destroyer and create his own method of time travel. Tony is a superhuman multitasker, he has incredible processing speeds that surpass Reed's best attempts. He could potentially use this ability to surpass Reed. Overall though Reed is currently the smartest.

    Avatar image for kuffyruff
    kuffyruff

    24

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Just curious... where would Arno Stark (Earth-616) fall on this scale? His mind was engineered with the intention of creating "the genius who would uplift humanity", and I'm fairly certain that he's at least on par with that of Tony's.

    Avatar image for blackspidey2099
    blackspidey2099

    10685

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    I'm willing to make a leap here and say that honestly, Peter Parker can probably be in the top tier. He's made it his business to figure out how to outsmart a lot of different people. He just doesn't get as much credit as he should and I for one believe that's because he isn't as flashy as Reed, or Tony or even Hank. Provide him with the same tools as those three and I say he can do it. The man made web-shooters from practically nothing and outsmarted Reed Richards in one of their crossovers.

    Now that he has the resources, he has shown himself to be smarter than Stark at the very least.

    Avatar image for supermanwithatan01
    Supermanwithatan01

    12118

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Bump. I know a list was made for marvel heroes but it’s a joke. I was wondering who everyone’s top 10 was.

    My generic list:

    0) High evolutionary

    T1) Reed Richards

    T1) Doctor Victor von Doom

    3) Thanos

    T4) Hank Pym/Ant-Man

    T4) Bruce Banner/The Hulk

    T4) Tony Stark/Iron Man

    7) The Leader

    T8) Amadeus Cho

    T8) T’Challa/Black Panther

    T10) Charles Xavier

    T10) Hank McCoy/Beast

    Help me edit it although I’m firm on my top 4.

    Avatar image for cosmic_reign
    cosmic_reign

    991

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #45  Edited By cosmic_reign
    Avatar image for supermanthor
    Supermanthor

    22700

    Forum Posts

    103

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 20

    Reed

    Avatar image for supermanwithatan01
    Supermanwithatan01

    12118

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Avatar image for cosmic_reign
    cosmic_reign

    991

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #48  Edited By cosmic_reign

    @supermanwithatan01 said:

    @cosmic_reign: thanks bud, what’s yours?

    Very close to your list....maybe a slight change in order.

    I'd also rank HE very high but I believe his expertise are more concentrated in specific subject areas(genetics etc) vs "all-around" intelligence. But I can be easily convinced otherwise.

    Maybe Valeria Richards/Von Doom and Moon Girl would be up there.

    I like your list of characters for sure homie!!

    Avatar image for supermanwithatan01
    Supermanwithatan01

    12118

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @cosmic_reign: thanks bud. I just don’t believe Moon girl has done anything of consequence. I tend to prefer feats to statements, and Marvel official stance on something has been so off lately so I take it with a grain of salt. I feel you on the high evolutionary. I just know he’s been around forever and he’s supposed to be as smart as possible so I just let him be 0 lol

    Avatar image for megacityone
    MegaCityOne

    214

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Human I say Doom he has the magic, mystical thing going on and physics / science / robotics , while Reed is smart one of the best he doesn't really do magic. Ironman has also been getting much better feats

    This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.