"Poorly Written"
"Second Coming"
"Same sentence"
Oh wait you're serious. Let me laugh harder.
Sorry but no. Might as well cash the "no valid opinion" coupon in if you're going to somehow imply X-Men had some "god tier writing" going on that doesn't include second coming. I'm just curious what sort of hat trick exists for this argument sans Claremont.
Are you going to bring out Morrison? As beloved as his work was, it wasn't without controversy either. Is Loeb's Fatal Attraction a high note? What about The Twelve? Are you talking post Jean's death, which was still Morrison?
Ok so you have Whedon on Astonishing and then Bendis' (who once again, has no controversy either right?) attempt with House of M, which is still really classified an Avengers event anyways.
I'm just asking if you're going to derp the herp and label Second Coming as a bad X-Book (even Schism for that matter) do clarify what you find as good X-Literature released in the past five-to-fifteen years.
Onslaught?
AoA?
Maybe you'll just pull out the get out of jail card and go with Uncanny X-Force, because Jean's totally in that.
Long story short, I don't think the X-books are in "trouble" and as big of a Phoenix fan as I am she has largely been reduced to fossil fuel via dark phoenix fumes for the past twenty years. Nobody knew how to write her, and what attempts were perceived as decent (Morrison) ultimately resulted in her death anyways (Morrison).
So no, the Phoenix saga part twenty won't "save" anything.
Log in to comment