Avatar image for cybrilious4
#1 Edited by Cybrilious4 (1990 posts) - - Show Bio

- Did you see the movie yet?

Avatar image for comicace3
#2 Posted by comicace3 (11726 posts) - - Show Bio

No I didn't see the movie. This should be in off topic bro.

Stay frosty my friend.

Avatar image for awesam
#3 Posted by AweSam (7527 posts) - - Show Bio

No, but it looks nothing like the book.

Avatar image for vortex13
#4 Edited by Vortex13 (12140 posts) - - Show Bio

@awesam said:

No, but it looks nothing like the book.

Plus it seems to have fast zombies which the book didn't. It kind of annoys me actually. They basically just took the title of the book and said f##k whats actually in between to front and back cover. It actually more than annoys me it straight up pisses me off. The book was interesting and had a lot of interesting characters, plot points, and concepts that had genuinely not been discussed in zombie lore before. It'd be like doing a Daredevil movie where he isn't blind and isn't lawyer. I'm usually ok with film makers taking some creative license from the source material but the movie from what the trailer's show has absolutely nothing in common with the book. Like I said I'm pretty sure they took the title and nothing else.

Avatar image for dragonborn_ct
#5 Edited by Dragonborn_CT (26211 posts) - - Show Bio

The trailer alone gave my cancer. I want to stay as far away from the movie as possible

Loading Video...

Avatar image for royal_rumble_man
#6 Posted by Royal_Rumble_Man (525 posts) - - Show Bio

Read DayZ and WorldWarZ

movie looks crummy

Avatar image for awesam
#7 Posted by AweSam (7527 posts) - - Show Bio

@vortex13: Not really. I figured it was just a prequel. If the zombies were slow, then it wouldn't be movie-grade. We would just have The Walking Dead. The book was great, but it wouldn't make them nearly as much money as a movie that took place during the zombie apocolypse. They pretty much made a call; stay true to the book or make money.

Avatar image for the_stegman
#8 Posted by The Stegman (36494 posts) - - Show Bio

It was meh. Horrible ending.

Online
Avatar image for nerdork
#9 Edited by nerdork (4055 posts) - - Show Bio

Regarded as the biggest flop of 2013, so far. They reshot a portion of the film, and it cost them over $80 million. Pitt wouldnt even talk to director Forster, due to a silly and juvenile falling out, and would only communicate through intermediaries. I wrote a blog about the production of the film a few months back if you want to check it out...

http://www.comicvine.com/forums/off-topic-5/world-war-z-adaptation-to-suck-690441/

Avatar image for comicstooge
#10 Posted by ComicStooge (21916 posts) - - Show Bio

I saw it and liked it.

It has nothing to do with the book, though.

Avatar image for nerdork
#11 Posted by nerdork (4055 posts) - - Show Bio

@comicstooge: I figured it would be a decent movie, in its own right...but giving it the title "World War Z"; guarantees that a REAL adaptation to the book will not happen for a long time.

Avatar image for comicstooge
#12 Edited by ComicStooge (21916 posts) - - Show Bio

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge: I figured it would be a decent movie, in its own right...but giving it the title "World War Z"; guarantees that a REAL adaptation to the book will not happen for a long time.

Yeah, which suck.

WWZ was an awesome book and would be great if the movie were in a documentary sort of format.

Perhaps they could do that in the sequel?

Avatar image for nerdork
#13 Posted by nerdork (4055 posts) - - Show Bio

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge: I figured it would be a decent movie, in its own right...but giving it the title "World War Z"; guarantees that a REAL adaptation to the book will not happen for a long time.

Yeah, which suck.

WWZ was an awesome book and would be great if it were in a documentary sort of format.

From when i first read the book, I was so certain that it would be adapted into a 10-15 episode mini-series (1 1/2 to 2 hours each) on HBO. I do not see any other way it could accurately, and effectively, incorporate all of the stories. I mean, there are only 2 or 3 narratives that dont need to be involved, to not disrupt continuity. It would require a huge budget, but HBO would have made a killing on it.

Avatar image for comicstooge
#14 Edited by ComicStooge (21916 posts) - - Show Bio

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge said:

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge: I figured it would be a decent movie, in its own right...but giving it the title "World War Z"; guarantees that a REAL adaptation to the book will not happen for a long time.

Yeah, which suck.

WWZ was an awesome book and would be great if it were in a documentary sort of format.

From when i first read the book, I was so certain that it would be adapted into a 10-15 episode mini-series (1 1/2 to 2 hours each) on HBO. I do not see any other way it could accurately, and effectively, incorporate all of the stories. I mean, there are only 2 or 3 narratives that dont need to be involved, to not disrupt continuity. It would require a huge budget, but HBO would have made a killing on it.

So true. I'd love it.

Which was your favourite interview/recount in the book?

My favourite was of that crippled night watchmen guy, Joe Muhammad.

Avatar image for nerdork
#15 Edited by nerdork (4055 posts) - - Show Bio

@comicstooge: Oh man, my favorite? Geez...that's a tough one. But, if I had to pick, it would fall between The Battle for Yonkers, The Celebrity Bodyguard, The Female Air Force Pilot or The Blind Japanese Gardener.

But, TBH, I could reread the whole book, and love every page. In fact, when I finish the book in reading right now...that's exactly what I'm gonna do.

Avatar image for the_stegman
#16 Posted by The Stegman (36494 posts) - - Show Bio

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge said:

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge: I figured it would be a decent movie, in its own right...but giving it the title "World War Z"; guarantees that a REAL adaptation to the book will not happen for a long time.

Yeah, which suck.

WWZ was an awesome book and would be great if it were in a documentary sort of format.

From when i first read the book, I was so certain that it would be adapted into a 10-15 episode mini-series (1 1/2 to 2 hours each) on HBO. I do not see any other way it could accurately, and effectively, incorporate all of the stories. I mean, there are only 2 or 3 narratives that dont need to be involved, to not disrupt continuity. It would require a huge budget, but HBO would have made a killing on it.

I agree, it would make for a much more interesting mini series than movie, there's just too much content for it all to be crammed into a two hour film.

Online
Avatar image for comicstooge
#17 Edited by ComicStooge (21916 posts) - - Show Bio

@nerdork said:

@comicstooge: Oh man, my favorite? Geez...that's a tough one. But, if I had to pick, it would fall between The Battle for Yonkers, The Celebrity Bodyguard, The Female Air Force Pilot or The Blind Japanese Gardener.

But, TBH, I could reread the whole book, and love every page. In fact, when I finish the book in reading right now...that's exactly what I'm gonna do.

Good idea. I want to re-read it too.

The Battle of Yonkers was amazing, though.

Avatar image for deranged_midget
#18 Edited by Deranged Midget (18346 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm hearing a lot of mixed views on the film. Fans of the book despise it, casual movie-goers think it's a rather enjoyable zombie-horror film.

Guess I'll actually have to see it.

Avatar image for comicstooge
#19 Posted by ComicStooge (21916 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm hearing a lot of mixed views on the film. Fans of the book despise it, casual movie-goers think it's a rather enjoyable zombie-horror film.

Guess I'll actually have to see it.

As a fan of the book, I still liked he movie. I knew it wouldn't compare, so I enjoyed it for what it was.

Avatar image for deranged_midget
#20 Posted by Deranged Midget (18346 posts) - - Show Bio

@comicstooge: I've read the book as well and from the trailer, it's painfully evident they have nothing in common but it still looked entertaining. Not a fan of judging something based off other reviews.

Avatar image for chaos_prime
#21 Posted by Chaos Prime (11585 posts) - - Show Bio

Not seen it, but looking forward to watching it next wk.

Avatar image for comicstooge
#22 Edited by ComicStooge (21916 posts) - - Show Bio

@deranged_midget said:

@comicstooge: I've read the book as well and from the trailer, it's painfully evident they have nothing in common but it still looked entertaining. Not a fan of judging something based off other reviews.

Do you have a favourite interview from the book?

Avatar image for deranged_midget
#23 Posted by Deranged Midget (18346 posts) - - Show Bio

@comicstooge: Yeesh, I can't pin-point that off the top of my head.

Avatar image for chibi_cute
#24 Posted by Chibi_cute (5157 posts) - - Show Bio

They screwed up another book. they made the zombies look so CGI and run like usain bolt.

In the book the zombies are slow walkers. And the first infection started in china

I wonder if that will also happen in the movie.

Avatar image for russellmania77
#25 Posted by russellmania77 (17603 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for awesam
#26 Edited by AweSam (7527 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for dragonborn_ct
#27 Posted by Dragonborn_CT (26211 posts) - - Show Bio

Oh the movie is now bombing? What a shock *sarcasm*.

Avatar image for fuchsia_nightingale
#28 Posted by Fuchsia_Nightingale (10191 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for dragonborn_ct
#29 Posted by Dragonborn_CT (26211 posts) - - Show Bio

@dragonborn_ct: Not a zombie fan I take it ? :P


You guessed correctly but it has little to do with me not liking zombies, and more with this movie taking the source material and beating the sh*t out of it with a bat. Not to mention, they did a f*cking terrible job with the marketing, putting the worse things you could in a trailer such as horrible screeching Inception music, cliched action sequences and waves of pile zombies. Not surprised it made many people choose to stay away from it.

Avatar image for fuchsia_nightingale
#30 Posted by Fuchsia_Nightingale (10191 posts) - - Show Bio

@dragonborn_ct: Haha Okay ^-^

To be honest,just off the trailers, idk what it was until it said WWZ, I'll hold final judgement till I see it =^-^=

Avatar image for SideburnGuru
#31 Posted by SideburnGuru (1367 posts) - - Show Bio

..Why the hell are undead corpses with rotting bodies able to keep up with cars and climb things? That goes against everything zombies have ever done.

I'm all for originality, but at least explain it. Or hell, do what 30 Days Later or whatever and just call them rage infected, THAT makes sense.. a bit more.