Which Mary Jane is more attractive: Zendaya or Kirsten Dunst?

@Ryagan: Now I must watch it...for educational purposes only.

Dunst. She looked great in the first Spider-Man movie.

The one that actually looks like Mary Jane.

@the_stegman: It's actually a pretty good movie. Definitely watch. For science.

Kirsten all day...just all around better looking imo

Um Zendaya isn't Mary Jane, she is a character named Michelle.

Kirsten Dunst

Zendaya but she isn't MJ.

Yeah but at the time this thread was made, it was rumored she was MJ. If you notice, this thread was last bumped 6 months ago.

@kidchipotle: oh yeah I didn't look but for what it's worth I think Zendaya is hotter.

It was also still confirmed that she was playing Michelle,.

Kristen was super hot in the firSt spider man and then she was just meh. Zendaya takes it for me.

Zeyanda...although those are bad pics of both of them...

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I'm baffled anyone finds Zendaya hotter. First, she looks like she's a teenager. Second, she has pretty much zero curves at all.

Third, while admittedly, Kirsten is no longer in her prime, when she WAS she was definitely a looker.

neither Emma Stone is hotter.

It looks like OP choose the worst pic possible for Zendaya.

@super_ninja said:

neither Emma Stone is hotter.

I always felt she looked more like MJ than Gwen.

@the_stegman said:

I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I'm baffled anyone finds Zendaya hotter. First, she looks like she's a teenager. Second, she has pretty much zero curves at all.

Third, while admittedly, Kirsten is no longer in her prime, when she WAS she was definitely a looker.

It's because Dunst has the sexual appeal of white bread and is waaaaay besides her prime.

@theamazingspidey: She has more sex appeal than the Disney star. And I'm thinking of her in her prime, when she was MJ, not now.

Wow you guys are harsh. She is still beautiful.

@thekillerklok: Yeah, she still is, but before she was /really/ good looking. Hell, even now she's better looking than Zendaya.

Dunst. Zendaya looks evil.

Zendaya, but that picture does not do her justice.

You could have picked any random picture off of her Instagram and it'd be better than the one the OP chose for Zendaya.

But Zendaya ain't even gonna play Mary Jane

Zendaya looks like a little boy in drag and acts like she's being dragged through mud. So I guess Kirsten, annoying as she is.

They aren't Mary Jane. Jesus. You people should get your eyes checked.

kirsten dunst looks like a generic 40 year old white girl.

What's with all the Dunst hate?

Kirsten

@actuallyvishnu: Umm, you do know that Dunst was only 20 when she began playing MJ and about 25 when she did Spider-Man 3, right?

For me it's Kirsten Dunst for sure

This is just my opinion, but Kirsten has the more attractive face and hair and Kirsten also has a hotter body shape to me. Sorry but I don't find Zendaya attractive at all. I can think of many black women I find more attractive than Zendaya like Moriah Mills, Alexis Avery, Janet Jackson, Halle Berry, Rihanna, Taraji P. Henson, Kerry Washington, Zoe Saldana, Jennifer Hudson, Kelly Rowland, Jada Pinkett Smith, Gina Torres, Alicia Keys, Ciara, Gabrielle Union, Naomi Campbell, Tyra Banks, Rosario Dawson etc.

Cassie is also a more attractive black woman imo

Even now I think Kirsten is more attractive than Zendaya. It's just my opinion of course. I'm sure there are people who find Zendaya more attractive than Kirsten and that is their opinion :-)

Bryce Dallas Howard is more attractive than Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy imo

even now as the actress in the dinosaur films

In fact I think Bryce is hotter than Kirsten Dunst, Emma Stone and Zendaya and any other woman in the Spider-Man films I can think of.

Zendaya isn't even Mary Jane Watson, Kevin Feige has confirmed this a long time ago.. her character is Michelle Jones.. WTF?

I may be in the minority but I'm very, very happy that No Way Home will be Spidey's last appearance in the MCU, Sony did a much much much better casting than the MCU. I hope they can recast half the characters

OT: Dunst by faaar

@stealthgrey: I didn't like any of the Tom Holland Spider-Man films and I think I will dislike No Way Home too. The Maguire Spider-Man films were my favourite and Garfield's Spider-Man comes in 2nd place. The casting in the Maguire and Garfield films were better than the casting in the MCU imo. The MCU purposely changed a lot of things and I didn't like those changes. They took out Uncle Ben and they made Tony Stark like his replacement as Peter's mentor...which is ridiculous. Then they made Flash as a non-intimidating bully...then they removed Harry Osborn and put Ned instead...but to be fair, Ned is a good character but I still miss Harry Osborn...the Harry Osborn-Norman Osborn (Green Goblin)-Peter Parker dynamic was missing in the MCU...and they made a 'Michelle Jones' instead of 'Mary Jane' plus redheads aren't common anyway so what was the point of taking away a well-established comic redhead? Also is there even a Gwen Stacy in the MCU? I can't remember. MCU Spider-Man is too childish for my taste...that's what Disney usually does and I don't like it...Sony did well with Bryan Singer's X-Men and the Maguire and Garfield Spider-Man films...more mature, grittier and serious versions of Spider-Man.

Zendaya for sure.

Zendaya

@arranvid: Sony didn’t do X-men films for starts, for another, I thought it was obvious that they’d likely save characters like Harry Osborn, Gwen Stacy, and so on for Peter’s college years, like it was for 616 Peter

Yep Sony didn't do X-Men, sorry I think it was Fox right? But you get what I mean. I think Fox's X-Men is better than the MCU. MCU Holland Spider-Man is just disappointing to me, I can't stand it sorry. Tom Holland is an excellent actor, in fact they're all excellent actors, but the storyline just doesn't sit right with me. I'm not sure I like 616 Peter that much, but I think I like the original comics Peter from decades ago the most.