@mrdecepticonleader said:
@PrinceAragorn1 said:
@mrdecepticonleader said:
No it doesn't. Why is it entirely different? Both are killing for pleasure/because they want to eat.
And what is actually done? they take a knife and cut their own heads off? Yeah right.
You seemed to have skipped my first and last points on comparing people who eat meat to killers.
Cannibalism can result when there is nothing else to eat,like when people become standard for example.Its different because people eating people is different to eating animals.
LOL no but Id imagine in most cases they are killed pretty quick so they don't suffer.
You know, killing in a way that the target doesn't suffer is does not make the killing right. If something doesn't want to be killed, it should be left alone.
When its for food there is nothing wrong with that.
To compare me to a serial killer is just utterly foolish.
So.. killing an animal against it's wish is ok. But killing a human is not. Is that about it?
Edit: I'll drop the sk analogy on vortex's suggestion though.
Log in to comment