Avatar image for mikethekiller
Avatar image for turoksonofstone
#2 Posted by turoksonofstone (14694 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for cattlebattle
#3 Posted by cattlebattle (15953 posts) - - Show Bio

LOL, they never had rights to begin with, nor does anybody really. Just the illusion of rights

Avatar image for crash_recovery
#4 Posted by Crash_Recovery (855 posts) - - Show Bio

The court looked at the data and saw that, by the numbers, it wasn't an issue in the 5 states that were under heavy scrutiny.

This is a good thing. It means that the problem that caused the provision to the act has been addressed and that the part of the law dealing with it is no longer necessary.

Think how many old laws that don't make any sense now are still on the books?

Avatar image for _black
#5 Posted by _Black (2301 posts) - - Show Bio

Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly will result from this? Officials can gerrymander without restraint now?

Avatar image for godtriggerhulk
#6 Posted by GodTriggerHulk (2084 posts) - - Show Bio

@_black: Basically nothing happens.

Avatar image for lykopis
#7 Posted by lykopis (10868 posts) - - Show Bio

The court looked at the data and saw that, by the numbers, it wasn't an issue in the 5 states that were under heavy scrutiny.

This is a good thing. It means that the problem that caused the provision to the act has been addressed and that the part of the law dealing with it is no longer necessary.

Think how many old laws that don't make any sense now are still on the books?

What numbers? Using examples of African American mayors in areas which back in 1965 were identified as needing this law? Congress voted in 2006 to keep this law, recognizing it's benefit -- it does nothing but ensure what happened before won't happen again. There was no reason for the Supreme Court to overturn Congress' decision and it was a decision heavily in favour of keeping the provision in place. A congress where the Republicans had a heavy majority.

It's telling that Texas was quick to take advantage of this decision --

@_black said:

Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly will result from this? Officials can gerrymander without restraint now?

Yes, these states (and certain areas of other states) can gerrymander without restraint -- the federal government no longer has any say in how voting districts can be altered.