@mister_x_1:
used by an inspiring female with cancer.
I didn't say I dislike Jane Foster, at first yes but after knowing her character and discovered what she was
going through.
But in what sense do you know Jane character? Are you taking about the Jane that was saved by Sif life force and exposed several time to magic, but now just because doesn't serve the new creative decisions rejects it unless its when she wields a magical hammer to become the female version of Thor? The Jane that has a son named James Kincaid that Aaron/Marvel editorial could care less about because what they try to sell from the first place is a fit for the female version of Thor? Where Jane is just the host for the hammer? Yes Jane was a good character before the Pr, but after she is not ,(for who knows the canon) she is a mess of a character full of contradictions without any sense of priorities (like the correlation between the fact that she is dying and her son) besides being the female version of Thor...
Here is the thing.
I understand where you are coming from, and I agree with you. Now Jane as much as some people like to
admit, she might be in a mess, not like Carol Danvers, but still a mess. Marvel can fix this by curing Jane and bringing
back her son, but they can't because they don't know how. Jane's character was kinda of a jerk when it started, but
Marvel thought it would be great to say that she has cancer so we can feel sorry for her, and we did. But soon people
will get tired of her and they might kill her like they did with Xavier, Scott, and Logan and all the other characters.
Which will be a shame as they will choose this over simply fixing the character and making her better than what she
is.
Log in to comment