Micheal Keaton was not that good of a Batman. Val Kilmer to me was more believable as the Dark Knight, and I liked his potrayal better. I feel Kilmer was the best Batman in the Burton/Schumacher series.
Val Kilmer was a better Batman than Micheal Keaton.
@thedarkknight9283: I didn't like any of them. Almost none of them gave Bruce a personality, IMO.
@vance_astro said:
Keaton was the best Batman to date.
This.
He wasn't overly in shape and never portrayed as a "serious" actor, he'd always been a comedian. I thought he was the best.
@joygirl: Bit early to assume Affleck, isn't it?
Agreed. Kilmer was the best Burten Batman by far IMO. He wasn't quite Bruce though.
Still prefer Bale overall because of the consistency.
@rulerofthisuniverse: Nope.
@joygirl: I thought he was really good in Argo. I can picture him as Batman.
@vance_astro said:
Keaton was the best Batman to date.
This. Glad someone else sees that.
Keaton was the best by a country mile.
He was the only one who actually acted like a real person
damaged, withdrawn, volatile, intense, you could see this guy actually had the sort of serious issues which would push him into wearing a disguise and going out on the streets intimidating and beating up criminals.
Nicole Kidman was HAWT in that movie. I have to disagree with Val Kilmer being better than Keaton though. I thought Keaton's Batman was more intimidating and badass overall.
I hated Keaton's weird, spastic, borderline ADD Bruce Wayne, not only was Kilmer better, but Bale and even Clooney were all better.
Keaton was and is my fav, Kilmer is a troglodyte and bale has throat cancer.
Clooney has bat nipples.
I didn't like neither of them. But Kilmer definitely had a better Bruce Wayne. But I think Keaton was the better Batman, although it wasn't that good in the first place.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment