Lmao k.
"That's a surprising thing to say after failing to counter even one of these "extremely speculatory, circumstantial and laughable" points"
Damn, I "failed" to counter any of your baseless assumptions (which is literally just your opinion), so that gives your position merit. That TOTALLY has nothing to do with the fallacy I posted.
@princearagorn1 said:
Just to be clear here:
I considered the proportions shown to be fairly obvious for anyone with basic observation skills and knowledge - but I even traced it when you came to the horrendous conclusion it may be around 450 sq km in size. Even saying you didn't see the proportions were comparable to that of moon/earth, it is impossible to even pretend the technique isn't large enough to be a significant chunk of a planet. Or I originally thought it would be impossible to pretend - yet here you are.
We don't even know how far Kishimoto zoomed out the freaking image of the "moon" coming out of the Earth. Your comparisons are faulty and based on assumptions. Period.
Yes, because galactus gave surfer one specific technique, and surfer did it exactly like it was done before. Oh wait.
The Sage of Six Paths created the moon to trap the ten-tails, not the gedo mazo. Would the gedo mazo not be weaker than the ten-tails? Why are we assuming that they'd make the chibaku tensei the same size as when the Sage did it if it would be on a weaker character? The irony here is that the ten-tails (something that should be WAY stronger than Naruto or Sasuke) was successfully trapped inside a moon by the Sage of Six Paths years ago, yet you think Naruto with only a fraction of the ten-tails' power (Kurama), can do better than that.
And your answers?
"The page shows how massive it is compared to curvature of the planet, you can even trace it and check against an earth/moon diagram" - "It looks like it may be 50-400 sq mile to me!"
"Kakashi said it" - "Meh, he's randomly saying things or lying"
"This same technique did the same thing in the past" - "But galactus! surfer! means it shouldn't do so now because.. um, um, - Im tired of reading your replies!"
Seriously, when the question is "moon sized or not?" - all the evidence in the series screams yes. And you're insisting on no, based on... nothing - because you don't want to accept it.
Based on nothing? Am I the only sane one here? Where does it 100% confirm that it is moon sized? Where in canon does it officially say in clear-cut terms that the hunk of mass was as big as the moon. I'd love to see this. Oh right, Kakashi said it looks like a moon so based on that statement alone that proves that it was 1,079 miles. Lmfao. This is ridiculous and this is my last response back to you guys. Like I said, we can agree to disagree. Nice having the discussion with you. I'm out.
Log in to comment