Avatar image for jointron33
#1 Posted by jointron33 (2107 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm tired of being looked own upon for reading comics, but not something like Twilight! If one is a legitimate form or literature, so is the other. For every Harry Potter, there is an All-star Superman. For every To Kill A Mockingbird, there is a Watchmen. And for every Twilight or smut novel, there is a Youngblood or Clone Saga. Damn literature Nazis to hell, along with that bastard Shakespeare.

Avatar image for batteredarmor
#2 Posted by BatteredArmor (6234 posts) - - Show Bio

That being said comics will never be taken seriously for the same reason that they are awesome. The pictures. Most I've talked to who don't like comics sat it's because they equate them to picture books

Avatar image for jedixman
#3 Posted by JediXMan (37787 posts) - - Show Bio

Most comic books should never be considered literature, just like most novels should never be considered literature. Only the select few comics and novels should be considered as such.

Moderator Online
Avatar image for guttridgeb
#4 Posted by guttridgeb (4881 posts) - - Show Bio

I agree. My mum used to tell me off for not reading enough "proper literature". The most irritating this was that I actually did read the kind of books she wanted me to.

Avatar image for smashbrawler
#5 Posted by SmashBrawler (6033 posts) - - Show Bio

@jointron33 said:

I'm tired of being looked own upon for reading comics, but not something like Twilight! If one is a legitimate form or literature, so is the other. For every Harry Potter, there is an All-star Superman. For every To Kill A Mockingbird, there is a Watchmen. And for every Twilight or smut novel, there is a Youngblood or Clone Saga. Damn literature Nazis to hell, along with that bastard Shakespeare.

LOL

I agree, comics are overlooked way too much.

Avatar image for AssertingValor
#6 Posted by AssertingValor (7805 posts) - - Show Bio

If u go with the saying "a picture is worth a thousand words" then comics are like novels i guess

Avatar image for aiden_cross
#7 Posted by Aiden Cross (15726 posts) - - Show Bio

Why not read both? Best of both worlds =)

Avatar image for theblueangel93
#8 Posted by TheBlueAngel93 (21064 posts) - - Show Bio

Books are books to me, including comic books.

Avatar image for the_poet
#9 Posted by The Poet (8646 posts) - - Show Bio

but literature is defined as WRITTEN word. Comics still belong on a book shelf, but I don't think they should be called literature because they are written and illustrated work.

I think the word you want more is "Classics". To Kill a Mockingbird is a classic to some people, and so is Watchmen. So I think the word you want is classic...

Moderator
Avatar image for jedixman
#10 Posted by JediXMan (37787 posts) - - Show Bio

@The Poet said:

but literature is defined as WRITTEN word. Comics still belong on a book shelf, but I don't think they should be called literature because they are written and illustrated work.

The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive terms. Comics are still written.

Still, I don't feel right calling "comics" literature. Just a select few GNs (throwing Sandman in there)

Moderator Online
Avatar image for mrshway88
#11 Posted by MrShway88 (721 posts) - - Show Bio

Comics are more than just literature. They are a combination of literature and modern art.

Avatar image for cuddles666
#12 Posted by cuddles666 (313 posts) - - Show Bio

We're getting there. I wrote my undergrad English thesis on Grant Morrison's portrayal of Darkseid and my graduate university even has a graphic novel specialist in their English Department! People have even written doctoral dissertations on Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, and Warren Ellis!

People in general tend to be pretty idiotic and close-minded, but that doesn't change the fact that five decades after Wertham and friends butchered the comics medium, we're taking it back and the people in the know are taking notice.....not that you'd have a terribly good chance of making that point to someone you just met on the street. But who cares about them anyway?

Avatar image for geoff2005
#13 Posted by geoff2005 (213 posts) - - Show Bio

i think most people look down because it has pictures

Avatar image for bumpyboo
#14 Edited by BumpyBoo (13392 posts) - - Show Bio

Many books that are considered literary classics are illustrated. Ask Lewis Carroll, Roald Dahl, or A. A. Milne. Ask Hunter S Thompson. Just because a piece of work is illustrated does not mean that any prose contained therein should be automatically dismissed as "not being real literature".

Moderator
Avatar image for yourneighborhoodcomicgeek
#15 Posted by YourNeighborhoodComicGeek (21616 posts) - - Show Bio

In my opinion, Comic Books are literature, only expressed in a different method.

Avatar image for eternal19
#16 Posted by Eternal19 (2178 posts) - - Show Bio

@geoff2005 said:

i think most people look down because it has pictures

this, because it has pictures people equate them to childrens books and dont give the comics or the people who read them respect. Im so sick of the insults and laughs when im reading a comic in public.

Avatar image for imagine_man15
#17 Edited by Imagine_Man15 (1809 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm slowly convincing friends and family of this very thing. I even got my dad, who spent years making fun of me for reading comics, to read Watchmen and he loved it.