@nickschuff: This has been bothering me since this started. The first Civil War arc turned into a ****show, but it started with a great premise. Everyone felt like they were right and you could agree with every side.
This time though its ridiculous. Carol believes in solving problems that might not actually even be problems and doing it in piss poor ways. If they had made it escalate in a way that actually made sense then fine. Make a small thing happen that they can change with no consequences, then up it to somethin larger. That way you actually build up to the whole Banner death thing instead of it just popping up. Suddenly it feels like there's some reasonable way to agree with Carols side because it all started out so mundane.
The only possible way to agree with Carols side in this is if you're one of those psychopaths who thinks nuking the middle east because that might solve terrorism is the correct solution to todays problems.
Not only is Carols side so terrible, they contrasted that by making Tonys side not just seem reasonable compared to Carols, but it actually is a reasonable side to be on. Let's not just to conclusions because some rando said somethin could possibly happen without any shred of proof and no other future seer has been able to corroborate. If they wanted Carol to be a raving lunatic they could have at least tried to make Tony seem like a super unreasonable person to give readers a reason to not immediately side with Tony.
Log in to comment