Despite Slotts talk of responsibility and how Peter's doing the millionaire act right, he's writing Parker to be a complete man-child who puts people in danger while arguing with tony in front of a supervillain. I mean seriously, I get that he got upset over MJ and what not but this is just ridiculous.
Peter Parker doesn't have an inferiority complex, so he shouldn't concern himself with stupid bullshit, especially while he's supposed to be saving people. And hiring Pepper Potts? Seriously? You want me to believe that Peter is so grudging, so petty, that he's willing to hire someone and spent vast amounts of money just to piss Tony Stark off? These trivial actions, more suitable for a five year old, performed by the C.E.O of a multimillion dollar company, which is supposed to design and manufacture gadgets for one of the world's largest spy Organizations, reminded me of why I stopped reading the Amazing Spider-man in the first place, every single time Slott manages to find a means of progressing the character in certain aspects, he backtracks in different, yet equally important qualities.
I want to like this title. Despite the fact that it's very arduous for my ego to admit, Dan Slott, a man I've criticized more than once, is genuinely doing something beneficial by acknowledging that Spider-man has been doing the double life shtick for a while now, thus, the hero has a firm understanding on how life works, both as a superhero and as a man. I like the idea that Peter actually maintains a cool head despite the riches he's amassed, however, shit like this diminishes my interest in the book significantly. I can already tell that the following, or better yet the current arc that has already been set in motion, will be a long (not pun intended) schlong measuring contest between Peter and Tony.
For now I'm only interested in the subplot with the guy in the Red Suit. Looks like he's regrouping Spider-man's original Rougue's gallery, and I want to see what they do with Rhino.
Log in to comment