I like the Uncanny Avengers, All New X-Men and Fantastic Four covers, They look sharp. I think the art on FF is fine but I still think the chick in the Thing suit is a stupid stunt. is it too soon to put out the call for the return of the Future Foundation.
Interesting! All look great, and Red Skull looks great on Uncanny Avengers. And All-New X-Men #1 I'd get, if for no other reason, just that awesome cover!
I really really really don't like that Miss Thing... thing. I love the way FF is now, and it works well with Fantastic Four, so why change it? I mean, are the kids still around or are they getting shoved into the Fantastic Four book? This new FF direction looks horrible, like another group of Fantastic Four but with different members, like Fantastic Four wannabes.
The Uncanny Avengers cover is nice - simple but nice!
Can anyone tell me who the guys behind Red Skull are? Especially the horned guy on the left and the 2 on the right side look quite interesting. And yes, I don't have much of a clue about the Marvel Universe. Thanks in advance.
Uh, the Uncanny Avengers cover looks like a mess. Truthfully speaking, not that enticed by it as i was expecting to see more of the roster reveal or something along those lines.
Shouldn't have the phrase "All New X-Men" next to the boring and original ones. Though, i'll still be checking out the first issues of both out.
@hortrorog: I am just not a fan of his team writing. Individual writing is great, especially if he can create his own world (i.e. Ultimate Universe). But the fact is, he doesn't know anything about the xmen, his colleagues even said so. He just read the Kirby/Lee X-Men 1 and said "I want to write something like this." He is ruining canon just because he thinks he knows everything about the x-men. If he really wanted to make the x-men fun, he should read some Claremont stuff. We already have two excellent X-Book writers, Aaron and Gillen, and we do not need Bendis and his Dopplegangers taking the spotlight; especially when there are so many other things that are being taken away in-lieu of this book. I mean really we are losing Legacy, Astonishing, New Mutants, UXM, and UXF; all to be replaced by characters we already have.
@hortrorog: I am just not a fan of his team writing. Individual writing is great, especially if he can create his own world (i.e. Ultimate Universe). But the fact is, he doesn't know anything about the xmen, his colleagues even said so. He just read the Kirby/Lee X-Men 1 and said "I want to write something like this." He is ruining canon just because he thinks he knows everything about the x-men. If he really wanted to make the x-men fun, he should read some Claremont stuff. We already have two excellent X-Book writers, Aaron and Gillen, and we do not need Bendis and his Dopplegangers taking the spotlight; especially when there are so many other things that are being taken away in-lieu of this book. I mean really we are losing Legacy, Astonishing, New Mutants, UXM, and UXF; all to be replaced by characters we already have.
Thank you.
Granted, as you know, Legacy's being relaunched, UXF is still staying according to Remender, Astonishing has of yet to be confirmed but yeah, so long UXM and NM.
Log in to comment