Excluding Dracula as some stories paint him as the originator of both. Other than that use anything you want, who would win?
Werewolves versus Vampires
stupid battle. Dracula and other powerful vampires have full controle over all werewolves. its a bit of a one way battle.
Hell_Spawn says:
"stupid battle. Dracula and other powerful vampires have full controle over all werewolves. its a bit of a one way battle."
That really depends on which 'mythology' you look at now doesn't it?
In others, they are implacible enemies, and pound for pound Werewolves are stronger, more ferocious, and travel in packs... sure some Vampires can fly, but they have to sleep during the day. In a war of attrition I think the Werewolves would have a distinct edge.
their classy? hows that gonna help them win when they are under mind controle that they cant break out of? by the way werewolves are human except on a full moon. oh well i like werewolves more. just give them the win
Post Edited:2007-07-19 09:41:12
Ok, here I go. Prepare for a rant everybody. takes a big breath
First of all, werewolves don't need blood to live. They can survive for long amounts of time without having blood. Vampires have many weaknesses, like daylight(though some can withstand it due to certain conditions) and not having blood for a while. Werewolves, I know have silver, and it only stings, can't kill them. if injected into the bloodstream(see Underworld) it can be fatal. Or a silver bullet. that would hurt like hell and make them wish for death. Werewolves(in my opinion) are way cooler, because they can run wicked fast, they are wicked strong(sure some vampires may be....) and, they have 'unnatural sexual allure'. Vampires have to put a trance on their victims, but werewolves just sit back, relax, and wait for the girls to come to them. And, their power skyrockets during a full moon. Only at first can werewolves transform during a full moon, but as they get stronger and change more, they can transform in daylight. They also have caws. And they have heightened senses, unlike vampires. Vampires can sense things, normally based on blood or heartbeat.
And the only instance I know of Vampires controlling werewolves is in Van Helsing, when Dracula controled the wolfman and then tried to control Van Helsing, but the only thing in that movie that could kill Dracula is a Werewolf, that's why he had the Cure in case any werewolf ever had the willpower to go up against him.
Cryo-Wolf says:
"they're like normal werewolves. not hulk werewolves. that's an insult to the van helsing werewolves."
there huge and got alot of muscles and how is that an insult
Cryo-Wolf says:
"because you said hulk. you called them hulk werewolves. they're not hulk werewolves. they're normal werewolves. normal werewolves, that's it."
i mean the muscle when i said hulk
vanhelsing werewolves and underworld werewolves are hulkish, there were thousands before those movies came out and most from before the 70's were no bigger than a human, simply hairy. i would call them hulk like in comparrison
Gambler says:
"From what I understand Werewolves have always been underneath Vampires *sorry Cryo*"
don't feel "sorry" for cryo, he actually knows what he's talking about. I have yet to hear any convincing arguements for vampires, on this forum or anywhere else.
Rock on Cryo
ese is a spanish word, but i know people on this site don't all speak spanish so i use it for terms of respect.
if i call you a
noob- i don't have any respect for you
nothing- better then a noob
mang- second highest term of respect,note i spell it with a g on perpose its how i talk in real life.
ese- highest term of respect.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment