Title says all. Whomever in order to not make this a stomp, this is going to be a much weaker version of hulk.
Hulk:
-Three versions.
Saitama:
-None
Rounds
Round 1- Non serious Saitama vs Grey Hulk (Joe Fixit)
Round 2- Little serious (boros battle) vs Doc Green Hulk
Round 3- Serious Saitama vs Savage Hulk
Rules
-None
Wins by knockout or BFr
Saitama one shots him, 2 words: serious punch. Mismatch. Saitama would stomp the avengers aswell, hulk would be childs play.
@lord_adamantium: Boros healing factor being better than Hulks is debatable, also Boros has nowhere near the durability Hulk and you are equating healing with durability, even mid tiers can turn someone like Deadpool into soup even though the guy has a healing factor that allowed him to heal from nothing but a fingernail once, that doesn't mean he has the durability to match.
And PR-Beyonder who was the nigh-omnipotent and all knowing being of Marvel universe said that there is no limit to Hulks strength either, so even using that asinine logic Hulk > Saitama.
Boros could probably beat Fixit, but loses to pretty much every other Hulk out there, with Savage stomping him into oblivion.
I never stated Boros had Hulks durability only that his healing factor is much better than Hulks which is not at all debatable as the gif below clearly shows:
Regenerating from a single eyeball instantaneously:
Boros Showed incredible durability when fighting Saitama but Saitama's semi serious punches are just astronomical as far as damage output is all, as are his casual punches for that matter.
Hulks strength is indeed limitless but is dependent on his rage and it takes him time to ramp up. Saitama has limitless energy on tap at will. There is a difference. The actual accurate logic would be Hulks strength potential =/= Saitama's energy i.e both are limitless (they are not mutually exclusive you see) it just takes Hulk some time to increase his levels of rage-determined strength whilst Saitama can increase his damage, speed, and power output at will and his durability is apparently always at it's highest level irregardless of his anger threshold or emotional state.
I mean, Marvel is my Favorite universe and I am not much of an anime fan myself, but anyone who watched the Saitama vs Boros fight and still cannot admit that Boros would give Savage Hulk a good fight is too biased to even debate.
No thanks. Not interested in the post-dissecting, multi-quote, line for line, back and forth. That is not at all my idea of enjoyment. If it is your idea of a good time I feel bad for you.
Later.
@lord_adamantium: Boros healing factor being better than Hulks is debatable, also Boros has nowhere near the durability Hulk and you are equating healing with durability, even mid tiers can turn someone like Deadpool into soup even though the guy has a healing factor that allowed him to heal from nothing but a fingernail once, that doesn't mean he has the durability to match.
And PR-Beyonder who was the nigh-omnipotent and all knowing being of Marvel universe said that there is no limit to Hulks strength either, so even using that asinine logic Hulk > Saitama.
Boros could probably beat Fixit, but loses to pretty much every other Hulk out there, with Savage stomping him into oblivion.
I never stated Boros had Hulks durability only that his healing factor is much better than Hulks which is not at all debatable as the gif below clearly shows:
Regenerating from a single eyeball instantaneously:
Boros Showed incredible durability when fighting Saitama but Saitama's semi serious punches are just astronomical as far as damage output is all, as are his casual punches for that matter.
Hulks strength is indeed limitless but is dependent on his rage and it takes him time to ramp up. Saitama has limitless energy on tap at will. There is a difference. The actual accurate logic would be Hulks strength potential =/= Saitama's energy i.e both are limitless (they are not mutually exclusive you see) it just takes Hulk some time to increase his levels of rage-determined strength whilst Saitama can increase his damage, speed, and power output at will and his durability is apparently always at it's highest level irregardless of his anger threshold or emotional state.
I mean, Marvel is my Favorite universe and I am not much of an anime fan myself, but anyone who watched the Saitama vs Boros fight and still cannot admit that Boros would give Savage Hulk a good fight is too biased to even debate.
No thanks. Not interested in the post-dissectine, multi-quote, line for line, back and forth. That is not at all my idea of enjoyment. If it is your idea of a good time I feel bad for you.
Later.
So it's an irrelevant point considering Saitama will never manage to damage Hulk as much as he did Boros, on top of that Hulk regenerated from nothing but a bare bone skeleton, no flesh just a skeleton so again i say it's debatable, especially seeing all that renegeration lead to Boros dying in the when he body couldn't take it anymore and couldn't regenerate.
The point was that neither have limitless strength, this should be obvious to anyone that has common sense and has at least minimal understanding of the universes. Saitama has at most displayed continental level feats, which are not enough to put down Hulk, whose tanked worse.
Well i can tell you that despite Marvel being your favorite universe you know little of it, especially when it comes to Hulk if you think Boros gives a fight to a serious Hulk.
If you aren't interested in debating, then i have no idea what you are doing wasting your time on a forum specifically meant for debating, feel bad for that.
Bye.
Log in to comment