Saitama (OPM) vs Dante (DMC)

Dante has the weaponry and the hax. But if he doesn't start off in devil trigger let alone use said weapons and hax at the beginning of the fight, he is getting one punched. Basically for Dante to win he has to end this fight as soon as possible.....

Dante stomps.

Dante 7/10 do to Time abilities and Healing Factor. Saitama is no gonna serious series him right away and if Dante gets an arm blown off right way he isn't gonna continue to not use his hax. I don't think Santana could blitz dante In that fashion anyway.

Dante.

Yamato, Baggle of Time and Majin DT should be enough.

Saitama stll one shots, Saitama is meta like Popeye and has a serious punch strong enough to equal the big bang.

SaItama can bust the universe is is completely invincible according the the author, he ignores all of Dante's attacks and pokes him unconscious because he finds Dante a cool guy.

@jimishim12: as if he has the speed to even land a clear shot. Again. Yamato cuts him in half.

but DANTE has to many hax

@khael: Saitama would uppercut Dante into outer space and Dante would have to fly back.

Saitama like someone said resisted a black hole and reality warping, after Dante gets beaten Saitama gets Dante to change his life from a poor mans merc to a Superhero.

Saitama has never resisted a black hole, nor has there ever been a case of reality warping in OPM.

@zzagirl: He has however resisted a laser beam comparable to a collapsing star while Dante has bled from getting shot in the face.

@dygoboy: Saitama is just as fast as Dante. He jumped from the moon back to earth, and fighting with the rain being frozen in the air is also something characters at his speed level have done.

No he hasn't. This is why I generally stay out of these Saitama threads lately, too many One Punch Man wankers that like to make crap up.

Does this Dante fella do 100 push-ups, 100 sit-ups, 100 squats, and run 10 km every day? I think not, he gets one punched.

@randomsid82: Yes he has. The attack was called the "collapsing star, roaring cannon" and was specifically said to be capable of destroying a planet

No he didn't. The biggest thing he tanked was Boros final attack and that was ONLY said to be able to destroy the surface of the earth. That is barely even moon level. Do you have any idea what the difference is between moon level and star level?

@randomsid82: "said to be able to destroy the surface of the earth."--- How is that barely moon level? That would wipe out everything on the planet. One laser beam, the entire surface of the Earth.

"difference between moon level and star level"--- Do you understand the difference between releasing energy comparable to a collapsing star, and actually destroying a star?

Okay, first off. The manga said it would wipe out the surface of the Earth, the anime said it would destroy the entire planet.

Secondly, do you realize how much smaller the moon is in comparison to the earth? 80 moons would be the size of the Earth. The moon is also less dense. That small laser was going to cause an explosion that would spread and incinerate the entire surface of the earth.

Do you understand that no one said it would destroy or damage a star?

@randomsid82: First off, since when do we define planet destroying as having to obliterate it completely?

. Do you realize exactly how small the surface of the Earth is compared to the entire Earth?

Except you are assuming the laser beam would just spread around the surface destroying everything without damaging the Earth itself. Which is nonsensical.

"You were comparing it to collapsing a star, please explain how collapsing a star would do no damage to the star."---- Umm... The star is collapsing because it's dying, it's not dying because it's collapsing.

When a star collapses it releases a wave of energy that spreads out. When we are comparing the laser to a collapsing star we are NOT saying the entire force of the explosion is concentrated into the laser beam. What we are saying is that the laser beam has the same amount of energy as similarly sized section of energy released from a super nova. When a star goes super nova, it doesn't always obliterate every single planet in the vicinity, some get their surfaces stripped and end up revolving around the black hole.

One star going super nova is not going to destroy another star.

@randomsid82: "makes no sense whatsoever. If you are not saying it has the power of a collapsing star, then don't say it does."

Facepalm* Because it DOES have the energy comparable to a collapsing star, it's just not all of that energy concentrated into a single beam. Getting hit by the laser is like being in the vicinity of a collapsing star, that does not mean that the laser is the as powerful as the entire collapsing star getting concentrated into a single beam.

"You should not seek a career in any scientific field. If a star is close enough to another star and it goes Supernova, it most certainly can and will destroy the other star."

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/multimedia/dhardy-star.html

We have observed stars in binary systems surviving the other one going supernova. We have even observed stars surviving it's own supernova (neutron star). It's incredibly hard to destroy a star. If two stars are close enough for one to be harmed by the other's supernova, then their proximity is probably what caused the supernova to begin with.

@randomsid82: "The way you were talking, was that the laser had the power of a collapsing star."

It does. Holy crap you don't listen. Pretend S is the collapsing star, and N is the radiation from the nova.

NNN

NSN

NNN

The laser is not all those Ns combined into a single beam, it's just one of those Ns.

"The fact that it did no damage to the earth even after Saitama punched it, shows that it was mere hyperbole and it didn't have anywhere close to the destructive force you claim." "If that were true, the planet would have been destroyed even with Saitama punching the laser."

Congratulations, you have not only debunked Saitama as planetary level, you have also debunked Goku, as well as the rest of the DBZ universe.

"are plenty of others where the star going Supernova did destroy accompanying stars as well as planets"---- Such as?

@randomsid82: "False, DBZ clearly explains focusing attacks to do minimal damage to the environment."

Your argument was that if it had enough energy to destroy the planet focused into that beam, then Saitama punching it would have caused it to explode and destroy the planet anyways. There is literally no difference in that example and the many "focused" attacks that happen in DBZ.

"Look it up, I'm not going to do your research for you."

That's not how debating works. You bring up an argument it's your job to prove it.

@randomsid82: "It is VERY different. One of the Key aspects of DBZ is focusing your attack ONLY where you want it to go with little ki leakage doing damage where you don't want it to go. That concept doesn't even exist in One Punch Man. You see them all the time destroying large chuncks of the environment and not caring one bit."

If the energy wasn't "focused"... Then it wouldn't be a laser beam...

"You were the one that brought up that argument, I just disputed it"

No, you didn't dispute it. I told you that stars in binary systems survive supernovas all the time, then provided an example. In order to dispute something you need to provide counter evidence. You claim that one star collapsing would destroy another nearby star. I challenged you to find an observed example of this. The burden of proof is on you. If you don't have the time or inclination, that's not my problem. Apparently you have the time sit here and argue, but not find something that should be easy to find if it happened as regularly as you seem to think.

@randomsid82: "Do you even read what you type? It is nothing similar at all. They focus their attack to hit ONE THING ONLY, the laser beam is not focused like that"

Of course it's like that. It's friggen laser beam. So when one of those "focused" dbz attacks gets blocked or deflected into the ground, what happens to all that energy?

"comparing a marble to a watermelon."

I can compare them. They are both round objects and when you throw them at someone they don't hurt anything they don't hit.

"We are done, you don't even know what the word dispute means."

Haha, irony.

@zetsumoto: Ok, last post I will make to you on the subject. You obviously have no clue how to compare something. Saying that his laser beam is like the focused attacks of DBZ is purely ludicrous. They share nothing in common whatsoever. A laser beam hits something that it can destroy its going to go straight through it and cause damage to anything else it hits. DBZ focused attacks once they have hit what they were aiming at, have the ability to stop the damage completely to prevent environmental damage. They explain it more in Dragon Ball Super talking about Ki Leakage causing what environmental damage that we do see.

This is not about DBZ however, it is about One Punch Man who has not shown anything like that at all.

Now, about your little example, you leave out the fact that it was nothing more than a google search where in that very article they say:

I would be a little skeptical of the certainty of this claim only because we have not been able to observe any of these Type Ia explosions up close while it is happening. That's why the Type Ia SN 2011fe is so important to us. It is merely 21 million light years away, instead of a billion.

You also leave out the fact that it is talking about a single type of Supernova. But you know, claim whatever you want to claim. The simple fact is that Saitama has not come up against anything stronger than moon destruction level force. Now, I'm going to go back to my game I was playing and leave this thread to the Saitama wankers, nobody really believes them anyway.

DBZ focused attacks once they have hit what they were aiming at, have the ability to stop the damage completely to prevent environmental damage. They explain it more in Dragon Ball Super talking about Ki Leakage causing what environmental damage that we do see.

Proof of this. You've said this in another debate but never showed proof of this. You should show proof instead of running around the vine saying this.

@randomsid82: "You also leave out the fact that it is talking about a single type of Supernova"--- Yea. The type of supernova that happens when stars are in the same solar system as in really close to each other. Also, why would we use a more powerful form of supernova as an example?

As for the dbz bit, once again the burden of proof is on you. Even if it is true, why do guys like Cell, Frieza, and Majin Buu give a shit?

When will you learn how to quote people instead of putting what they said without notifying them you did that? I've talked to you about this before, all it is is an attempt to dispute something they said without letting them know so they have no chance to dispute you. And as I have said before, give me a place that I can get scans from the manga and I'll show you. I do not have it on my computer, but anybody that has actually read the manga and not just claiming to, knows it is a key aspect of DB.

Are you ever civil? Unless you have proof of this stop running around saying it.

Yes it is on him.

Could go either way.

I have been plenty civil, but when you repeatedly quote something I say without tagging me, all it shows is cowardice and I see no reason to be nice to that. Maybe when you learn to quote someone without trying to avoid that person seeing it, you will get a civil reaction.

I simply forgot to quote you. That shows cowardice? So by you quoting it shows you're a man? You contradicted yourself saying you weren't civil lol.

You claim that every time. I find it highly unlikely, nearly impossible, that you forget every time knowing that I am going to call you out on it.

I'm only human. I hope you have a nice Valentines Day.

While I still find it highly unlikely that you "forget to tag" that often, you have a nice Valentines Day too.

Same to you :)

@randomsid82: @never_give_up:

Lets all have a happy passive aggressive valentines day! xD

Yea :)

Someone needs to let out some aggression lol.

IF IT WAS A BLACK HOLE or if it did have a blake hole gravity it would destroy earthe in a less second. And to survive a black hole you need to have limitless durabilty

Yeah, it wasn't a black hole.

@randomsid82: someone that understand