Master Chief Vs. Iron Man

@dottiestmoon: except for the fact that emps don't work against iron man.

isn't Iron Man past the 100 ton mark?

@noone301994: The EMP was nothing like the ones in halo.Tony Stark uses an internally wired system that links to a fusion generator in his chest, surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal. The fusion generator requires a constant stream of electricity controlling the actual magnetism of the fusion reactor, and it also requires a constant temparuture operating adjusting to the heat inside and outside the Iron Man suit itself. This makes the suit vunerable to two different kinds of attacks, Electromagnetic Pulse, and Temperature beams. If the Chief is able to detonate a large enough electromagnetic pulse bomb, or EMP near the Iron Man armor, it could disable the armor for a while until Stark is able to get it back online via core replacement or electricity surges.

Depends on EMP.The Unsc has EMP grenades which can completing drain down covenant armor and weapons.Tony Stark uses an internally wired system that links to a fusion generator in his chest, surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal. The fusion generator requires a constant stream of electricity controlling the actual magnetism of the fusion reactor, and it also requires a constant temparuture operating adjusting to the heat inside and outside the Iron Man suit itself. This makes the suit vunerable to two different kinds of attacks, Electromagnetic Pulse, and Temperature beams. If the Chief is able to detonate a large enough electromagnetic pulse bomb, or EMP near the Iron Man armor, it could disable the armor for a while until Stark is able to get it back online via core replacement or electricity surges. The EMPs chief has are in the future and a plasma pistol can drain Tony's suit for a while.

Actually i think you're ignoring me.You just gave me a comic strip of piper in the iron man armor getting EMP in a old comic. I'm doing a comparison with bleeding edge Iron man.A plasma pistol should EMP Iron man in the arc and it drains all energy of the target.In headhunter a spartan team had EMPs which were capable of disabling energy shielding and weapons of the covenant.You didn't listen to my post above.The thing is the EMPs in halo drain energy shields so the EMP shielding is going to useless.

@citizensentry: You're comparing tony from any version in any armor.I'm currently comparing with Tony in the model 3 bleeding edge armor with chief in the Mark VI gen 1 since the gen 2 he currently wear barely has any info.

I hate to admit it, but I think Master Chief will win. The only advantage that Iron Man has is the ability to fly Mach 4, and the Unibeam. Even the Unibeam is completely outmatched to the Spartan Laser, which is a five round burst 20GW laser. Chief has access to plasma weapons, light compression weapons, and normal ballistics. Iron man has access to experimental weapons, some of them never tested. And when Iron Man's armor got destroyed by Hammers Sidewinder Ex-Wife missile, it was just sheer speed that destroyed it, about Mach 20. The Railgun, it's a 5.4mm explosive armor piercing round going Mach 40. I doubt even Captain America's shield could stand up to that.

Tony Stark uses an internally wired system that links to a fusion generator in his chest, surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal. The fusion generator requires a constant stream of electricity controlling the actual magnetism of the fusion reactor, and it also requires a constant temparuture operating adjusting to the heat inside and outside the Iron Man suit itself. This makes the suit vunerable to two different kinds of attacks, Electromagnetic Pulse, and Temperature beams. If the Chief is able to detonate a large enough electromagnetic pulse bomb, or EMP near the Iron Man armor, it could disable the armor for a while until Stark is able to get it back online via core replacement or electricity surges. Another vunerability of the Iron man armor is that heat can very much disable the armor itself temporarily, if surged in a certain location that is not as protected. Though Master Chief does not use EMP weapons, Chief does use Binary weaponry, which fires high energy beams of light that disintegrates everything that comes in contact with the projectile. Although Chief will have to pratice much more on his marksmanship, he still has a good chance going into hand-to-hand combat. On the other hand, the Master Chief is a walking tank, weighing much more than Iron Man. The Mk6 Mjolnir uses temperature resistant alloys, high energy shields, and light bending energy to assist its user in combat. Personally, I think Master Chief has a better chance of defeating Iron Man although I enjoy Stark's last-minute decisions more. In other words, I like Iron Man better, but Master Chief has a deadlier arsenal at his usage.

Master chief via pulse gun and plasma sword. Iron man never survived a blast from plasma. Plasma sword cut through anything. Crystal, metal, bones and stone. He can defiantly lift more than 60 tons and can run faster than you can imagine.

He survived a crash on earth from space. Beat up many trained fighters at age 14.

Dont bring that shit he tanked a hit by mjolnir. a crash from space is so much harder.

Not to mention his shield. Wont let rockets or laser strikes go trough it. If iron man get down to the ground. Then Chief grabs tony and put the plasma sword through his guts and spill them all over the place.

@citizensentry: I just did a comparison with the bleeding edge iron man the whole time.Give up Iron man is strong but he lack odds with the spartan.If you want a comparison with a bleeding edge armor I hope you like reading since I'll be copying and pasting a entire text.

I hate to admit it, but I think Master Chief will win. The only advantage that Iron Man has is the ability to fly Mach 4, and the Unibeam. Even the Unibeam is completely outmatched to the Spartan Laser, which is a five round burst 20GW laser. Chief has access to plasma weapons, light compression weapons, and normal ballistics. Iron man has access to experimental weapons, some of them never tested. And when Iron Man's armor got destroyed by Hammers Sidewinder Ex-Wife missile, it was just sheer speed that destroyed it, about Mach 20. The Railgun, it's a 5.4mm explosive armor piercing round going Mach 40. I doubt even Captain America's shield could stand up to that.

Tony Stark uses an internally wired system that links to a fusion generator in his chest, surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal. The fusion generator requires a constant stream of electricity controlling the actual magnetism of the fusion reactor, and it also requires a constant temparuture operating adjusting to the heat inside and outside the Iron Man suit itself. This makes the suit vunerable to two different kinds of attacks, Electromagnetic Pulse, and Temperature beams. If the Chief is able to detonate a large enough electromagnetic pulse bomb, or EMP near the Iron Man armor, it could disable the armor for a while until Stark is able to get it back online via core replacement or electricity surges. Another vunerability of the Iron man armor is that heat can very much disable the armor itself temporarily, if surged in a certain location that is not as protected. Though Master Chief does not use EMP weapons, Chief does use Binary weaponry, which fires high energy beams of light that disintegrates everything that comes in contact with the projectile. Although Chief will have to pratice much more on his marksmanship, he still has a good chance going into hand-to-hand combat. On the other hand, the Master Chief is a walking tank, weighing much more than Iron Man. The Mk6 Mjolnir uses temperature resistant alloys, high energy shields, and light bending energy to assist its user in combat. Personally, I think Master Chief has a better chance of defeating Iron Man although I enjoy Stark's last-minute decisions more. In other words, I like Iron Man better, but Master Chief has a deadlier arsenal at his usage.

lets face it, a Binary rifle will only moderatly damage Iron Man's armor if we put this as real as we possibly could. Since Master Chief has an energy shield, he is able to withstand these kinds of projectiles without damage to armor. Iron Man does not posses a shielf, but relies on thick steel alloy armor to deflect small arms projectiles. However, the Iron Man suit itself is not able to withstand 20mm Gatling cannon fire because 3-5 inches of steel cannot handle those rounds. Also, how can we stage this battle in an alternate universe if we cannot apply real life physics to it? We are forced to think how titanium and steel alloy armor react to different caliber projectiles, different types of weapons and even terminal velocity of the actual suits of armor when falling on an enviroment such as earth. Also, please note if we were to put this in outer space to pass these kinds of physics, Both of them have limited oxygen supplies and CO2 filters built in the suits, and they would not be able to survive in space without proper life support after a couple of days.

The Mk 6 Mjolnir armor is able to withstand .50 caliber rounds, but anything above such as the 14.7x120mm and the 20mm cannon round makes the suit vulnerable to such projectiles. Also, anything above the muzzle velocity of 2000 meters per second can plow right through the titanium. Iron Man's armor is about as thick as a modern MBT laminated kevlar and steel, which is vulnerable to anything above .50 caliber, BMG, Beowulf, and Action Express. It's also notable that the material that Iron Man uses for the suit is extremely vulnerable to heat, whilst the Mk 6 Mjolnir armor isn't.

Tony's plating can withstand anything below .50 BMG. Which means that his automatic weapons, sidearms, and close quarters weapons are almost useless. However, a shot from the Railgun (recoilless carbine) which uses a 40x46mm round traveling speeds up to Mach 40, a shot from the sniper rifle (14.5x117mm), or rocket launcher (120mm HEAT), or Spartan Laser (15 Gigawatt 5 beam burst) or possibly the sticky grenade launcher can severely damage or even disable the Iron Man suit entirely.

Master chief wins and will be tea bagging Tony at the end.Are we forgetting that Chief has fought a god too who is known as the didact who is stronger than hulk or iron man.In 72 hours after chief had a rough ground battle with the didact.It would be useless talking to you anyway and I have a life.

Actually i think you're ignoring me.You just gave me a comic strip of piper in the iron man armor getting EMP in a old comic. I'm doing a comparison with bleeding edge Iron man.A plasma pistol should EMP Iron man in the arc and it drains all energy of the target.In headhunter a spartan team had EMPs which were capable of disabling energy shielding and weapons of the covenant.You didn't listen to my post above.The thing is the EMPs in halo drain energy shields so the EMP shielding is going to useless.

It's called science retard.You as well haven't answered the part about 4 plasma shots draining energy shields.

@citizensentry: I just did a comparison with the bleeding edge iron man the whole time.Give up Iron man is strong but he lack odds with the spartan.If you want a comparison with a bleeding edge armor I hope you like reading since I'll be copying and pasting a entire text.

I hate to admit it, but I think Master Chief will win. The only advantage that Iron Man has is the ability to fly Mach 4, and the Unibeam. Even the Unibeam is completely outmatched to the Spartan Laser, which is a five round burst 20GW laser. Chief has access to plasma weapons, light compression weapons, and normal ballistics. Iron man has access to experimental weapons, some of them never tested. And when Iron Man's armor got destroyed by Hammers Sidewinder Ex-Wife missile, it was just sheer speed that destroyed it, about Mach 20. The Railgun, it's a 5.4mm explosive armor piercing round going Mach 40. I doubt even Captain America's shield could stand up to that.

Tony Stark uses an internally wired system that links to a fusion generator in his chest, surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal. The fusion generator requires a constant stream of electricity controlling the actual magnetism of the fusion reactor, and it also requires a constant temparuture operating adjusting to the heat inside and outside the Iron Man suit itself. This makes the suit vunerable to two different kinds of attacks, Electromagnetic Pulse, and Temperature beams. If the Chief is able to detonate a large enough electromagnetic pulse bomb, or EMP near the Iron Man armor, it could disable the armor for a while until Stark is able to get it back online via core replacement or electricity surges. Another vunerability of the Iron man armor is that heat can very much disable the armor itself temporarily, if surged in a certain location that is not as protected. Though Master Chief does not use EMP weapons, Chief does use Binary weaponry, which fires high energy beams of light that disintegrates everything that comes in contact with the projectile. Although Chief will have to pratice much more on his marksmanship, he still has a good chance going into hand-to-hand combat. On the other hand, the Master Chief is a walking tank, weighing much more than Iron Man. The Mk6 Mjolnir uses temperature resistant alloys, high energy shields, and light bending energy to assist its user in combat. Personally, I think Master Chief has a better chance of defeating Iron Man although I enjoy Stark's last-minute decisions more. In other words, I like Iron Man better, but Master Chief has a deadlier arsenal at his usage.

lets face it, a Binary rifle will only moderatly damage Iron Man's armor if we put this as real as we possibly could. Since Master Chief has an energy shield, he is able to withstand these kinds of projectiles without damage to armor. Iron Man does not posses a shielf, but relies on thick steel alloy armor to deflect small arms projectiles. However, the Iron Man suit itself is not able to withstand 20mm Gatling cannon fire because 3-5 inches of steel cannot handle those rounds. Also, how can we stage this battle in an alternate universe if we cannot apply real life physics to it? We are forced to think how titanium and steel alloy armor react to different caliber projectiles, different types of weapons and even terminal velocity of the actual suits of armor when falling on an enviroment such as earth. Also, please note if we were to put this in outer space to pass these kinds of physics, Both of them have limited oxygen supplies and CO2 filters built in the suits, and they would not be able to survive in space without proper life support after a couple of days.

The Mk 6 Mjolnir armor is able to withstand .50 caliber rounds, but anything above such as the 14.7x120mm and the 20mm cannon round makes the suit vulnerable to such projectiles. Also, anything above the muzzle velocity of 2000 meters per second can plow right through the titanium. Iron Man's armor is about as thick as a modern MBT laminated kevlar and steel, which is vulnerable to anything above .50 caliber, BMG, Beowulf, and Action Express. It's also notable that the material that Iron Man uses for the suit is extremely vulnerable to heat, whilst the Mk 6 Mjolnir armor isn't.

Tony's plating can withstand anything below .50 BMG. Which means that his automatic weapons, sidearms, and close quarters weapons are almost useless. However, a shot from the Railgun (recoilless carbine) which uses a 40x46mm round traveling speeds up to Mach 40, a shot from the sniper rifle (14.5x117mm), or rocket launcher (120mm HEAT), or Spartan Laser (15 Gigawatt 5 beam burst) or possibly the sticky grenade launcher can severely damage or even disable the Iron Man suit entirely.

Master chief wins and will be tea bagging Tony at the end.Are we forgetting that Chief has fought a god too who is known as the didact who is stronger than hulk or iron man.In 72 hours after chief had a rough ground battle with the didact.It would be useless talking to you anyway and I have a life.

A overcharge shot from a plasma pistol is very fast and yet you have to show me the speed of a overcharged plasma pistol to prove iron man can easily dodge it. A plasma pistol can EMP tanks,mantis and etc. which has a high amount of power.Iron man can fly up to the speeds of march 5.

You are so misinformed it's not even funny... Tanks and mantis' are NOWHERE even remotely close to the amount of power that an Iron Man suit has. If a simple plasma pistol was capable of draining the energy of a starship or something bigger, then maybe I can see it affecting his suit. "A overcharge shot from a plasma pistol is very fast" okay? How fast is very fast? It's not faster than Iron Man, that I can guarantee you. Here's a scan of him flying at mach 8.7 (that isn't even his top speed):

This alone proves that Iron Man can exceed mach 5 like you said and it also proves that he has great speed and he wouldn't be taken down by a simple plasma beam shot that goes "very fast"...

Tony Stark uses an internally wired system that links to a fusion generator in his chest, surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal. The fusion generator requires a constant stream of electricity controlling the actual magnetism of the fusion reactor, and it also requires a constant temparuture operating adjusting to the heat inside and outside the Iron Man suit itself. This makes the suit vunerable to two different kinds of attacks, Electromagnetic Pulse, and Temperature beams.

Okay you have been repeating this garbage for awhile now and I'm going to address it because it's getting annoying... I'm guessing you got the "internally wired system surrounded by 3 inches of solid metal" crap from a wikipedia source right? You do realize that that description doesn't describe every single Iron Man armor right? His Bleeding-Edge armor, for example, is liquid armor. Everything you are saying here is not true. I have shown you that he has EMP shielding so it won't work and I can show you his resistance to "temperature beams" as well. Just because you repeat a point, that I've already disproven, doesn't make it true. Here is the resistance to temperature beams:

Temperature beams will not work just like EMP's won't work.

If the Chief is able to detonate a large enough electromagnetic pulse bomb, or EMP near the Iron Man armor, it could disable the armor for a while until Stark is able to get it back online via core replacement or electricity surges.The chest is vulnerable and it's not like chief is not willing to EMP the core.Master chief could use stealth on tony and EMP the suit.

I've already proven that EMP's wouldn't work on Tony. I'm not going to post more scans and repeat myself like you've been doing. Iron Man's scanners can see invisibility by the way.

Master chief has great marksmanship and has a very fast reaction speed so he should be able to fire a plasma pistol without missing.

That doesn't matter if the person you are shooting at is flying at extreme speeds. You can't hit what you can't see.

With cortana's support or another A.I's he could react faster probably in nanoseconds since in glassland an A.I's reaction is in nanoseconds.Why would chief need to EMP tony anyway even though chief outclasses tony in every way basically besides speed.

LMAO he outclasses Tony in every way??? That's the biggest fanboy thing I've ever heard! WOW! Master Chief is an 100 tonner now? Master Chief has a 280 IQ like Stark? Give me a break. There isn't anything that he outclasses Stark in. You aren't proving any of the information you are saying either, you are just making stupid and ignorant claims. Sorry, bud.

People are mindlessly saying chief can't hurt tony but tony can't hurt chief as well.The replusor rays will be ineffective against chief.Master chief's shields can withstand more than a dozen plasma rifle shots which gives 3000C burns.The replusor rays give 360C burns imagine how may of those is going to take to put down his shields.

Where on Earth are you getting this information??? 360 degrees Celsius? WHAT?? You are literally just making stuff up as you go aren't you? Iron Man's repulsors are hot enough to effortlessly burn through steel (2,795 degrees Fahrenheit).

Either way, his repulsors aren't meant to be hot, they are meant to be a concussive force. They are designed to be a one way push beam so it's like the equivalent of a blunt force hit.

The armor itself without energy shields has a melting point 5000+C.Tony's steel alloy plating melting point is 3000C.Chief was able to survive in volcanic temperatures like in the mission forerunner.

Again, I ask: WHERE ON EARTH ARE YOU GETTING THIS INFORMATION?? Iron Man's armor ISN'T made of just steel alloy you fool. It doesn't burn at 3000 Celsius. I already proved that in a scan above where he withstood temperature beams that were 17,000+ degrees Fahrenheit.

The Uni-beam is the best tony has to hurt chief but again outclassed by the spartan laser.The uni-beam fires 1-2 gigawatts but it's going to be doing the similar or less amount of damage to a monitor's beam which chief takes without much stress.

You literally have no clue what you are talking about. You are just spouting out nonsense. 1-2 gigawatts? Again, I'd like a source, where are you finding this? Here is what his uni-beam can REALLY do:

That translates to 17,671.73 degrees Fahrenheit, pal. Even if you were right about Chief's suit being able to take 5000 degrees Celsius (which I also don't believe), I think this is enough.

In 72 hours after it's proven strong enough to hurt the didact and put him down for a few seconds.I don't need to prove the mindless fanboys that tony's steel alloy plating can be heavily damaged by chief's weapons.I made a wonderful text before and yet people ignore the facts.

Just because you type something doesn't make it true or fact. PROVE IT. Either with scans or sources. You are just saying words that have nothing to back it up so no one believes you. My words at least have scans to back up. Oh and by the way, his armor isn't steel alloy, get off wikipedia.