Galactus Vs COIE Anti-Monitor

To make it Fair i give Galactus 22 Planets to eat

Have you calculated how much power galactus will have after he eats 22 plantes?

The one who eats universes consumes the one who eats planets

The Anti Monitor

The one who consumes/destroys universes wins.

Anti Monitor wins with easy

Awww yeah, I'm back

Anti-Monitor eats him

COIE AM

@iknowwhoyouare: A Fat person may eat more than a UFC fighter, does that mean he would beat him in a fight, No; however here COIE Anti-Monitor wins.

Anti monitor because of feats but if these two met in a comic they'd probably have it be pretty equal. Galactus is kind if the marvel equivalent to AM

@kingant27: Yet if a fish eats shrimp and a shark eats seals, then the shark eats the fish. You gonna deny this too?

@kingant27: Then i give Galactus all Planets in the Universe to eat

AM still wrecks

@jayc1324:

Nope. AM is way above Galactus' levels. AM stomps.

Galactus vs Anti Monitor has been done many times.

It's pointless to do this since Galactus is featless with that level of power. Besides, COIE AM would win anyway. This is a mismatch either way you slice it.

Anti-Monitor shitstomps.

Anti monitor not even close

Mobius aka anti monitor wins.

Anti-monitor

anti monitor

Galactus kills him. Anti Monitor is overrated.

This needs to be locked!!! No just no

This needs to be locked!!! No just no

@zeromuseg: You realise the Anti Monitor needed a significant amount of time to actually "eat" (in reality, all he did was spread anti matter) a universe, right? It's not like he can do it in a flash. The anti matter wave created took years and years before it actually started to pick up steam.

@professorrespect:

That and Galactus is not only immune to anti matter but he can eat it, becoming stronger. Galactus hard counters him.

Gallery

He eats half of his own universe pretty fast.He only needs time to prepare multiverse level destruction.

There is also matter of stamina problem.No matter how strong Galactus get he will start losing his power pretty fast.Anti-Monitor will never lose his own.

Anti-Monitor can also drains Galactus powers.Galactus isn't immune to stealing his powers.Dr.Doom steal his powers durning secret wars and AM is all about draining and absorbing energy. Anti-Monitor kills and eats him.

Anti-Monitor gets overrated, yes he consumes Universes but over a long period of time, his best feat is fighting an amped Spectre which is the reason for me putting him above Big G.

@zeromuseg: Doom stole Beyonder’s powers using Galactus’ technology in secret wars and not once has Galactus ever lost stamina in mid battle not even against other multiversal threats like Scrier and Other and he’s been shown to be able to draw energy from a myriad of sources which includes anti matter which Anti Monitor would be supplying. Galactus could have performed Anti Monitors feat just by pressing a button on the ultimate Nullifier. Galactus eats AM like he did Dormammu.

Anti Monitor stomps.

@earendill: the ground out of frustration due to his inability to beat Galactus

If AM is at full power he stomps hard. If he's at the power which Supergirl almost killed Galactus stomps hard.

Antimonitor stomps

Isn’t it obvious guys, Anti-monitor adopts Galactus as he’s son and teaches him to eat a universe and in the process accidentally eats Galactus

Anti monitor needed prep to destroy a multiverse while Galactus during the same era had a device that could do it at the press of a button. I’ll never understand why you guys rank this clown over Galactus. Current Galactus can even destroy the multiverse without the un plus he eats anti matter which AM uses..

Anti-Monitor

ultimate nulifer is not part of Galactus powerset. Also current Galactus is far from being able to destroy a multiverse.

@supermanforever:

ultimate nulifer is not part of Galactus powerset

Well Galactus says otherwise and he's shown the ability to be able to summon it at will and has used it to erase a universe out of existence in another timeline.

Also current Galactus is far from being able to destroy a multiverse.

I'm tired of posting these scans so I'll just link a thread I posted them in. https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/eos-rimuru-tempest-vs-galactus-2055317/#js-message-16

Both the narrator and Oblivion confirms that Galactus is indeed capable to ending an infinite multiverse.

Anti Monitor

@stezzy:

Well Galactus says otherwise and he's shown the ability to be able to summon it at will and has used it to erase a universe out of existence in another timeline.

Again ultimate nulifer is merely a tool. This is like saying thor with hammer and without.

I'm tired of posting these scans so I'll just link a thread I posted them in. https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/eos-rimuru-tempest-vs-galactus-2055317/#js-message-16

Both the narrator and Oblivion confirms that Galactus is indeed capable to ending an infinite multiverse.

statments and i checked your post and none of them had a scan where it was stated that galactus is capable of ending any universe. Post the scan or quit bsing.

@supermanforever: Ok a weapon that he can conjure and use freely whenever he wants. I don’t see why this matters so much to you unless OP restricted it which he didnt. The scans are all in the thread that I linked you and they explicitly states Galactus was about to destroy the multiverse. It’s on the first page.

@stezzy:

Ok a weapon that he can conjure and use freely whenever he wants.

then why didnt he do that when he was getting mopped by celestials?

I don’t see why this matters so much to you unless OP restricted it which he didnt. The scans are all in the thread that I linked you and they explicitly states Galactus was about to destroy the multiverse. It’s on the first page.

Went trough every scan you posted on that forum and none of them had one. You could just link that one scan here.

Galactus is like Hercule to Anti Monitor.

@supermanforever: Why doesnt anyone do anything? Why dont Flash just speed steal all of his opponents? Why doesnt Aquaman just absorb all the liquid from his opponents, why doesnt Iceman just flash freeze his opponents on a molecular level every time? This dumb argument is so tiresome. Not every writer especially newer generation writers are going to remember something a character did in an issue 30 years ago that was written by someone else especially when they arent obligated to. The point of comic vs comic debates is to examine what both characters can do in canon and base your arguments off that. Saying, "Oh he hasnt used this or done that in years therefore he cant do it in this vs battle" is a really bad and outdated argument.

Putting the UN aside Galactus can still destroy the multiverse without it. The scans I posted are in the god damn link I gave you and its on the first page of the thread. I'm not reposting them just because you're either too lazy or too dumb to follow simple instructions. Keep playing ignorant if you want though but I'm not going to entertain you unless you're willing to stop acting like a baby.

Here's the link again or anyone else interested: https://comicvine.gamespot.com/forums/battles-7/eos-rimuru-tempest-vs-galactus-2055317/#js-message-16

I've posted these scans too many times on this site like in a Galactus vs Hades thread so I'm just going to post the link to them

The scans are from the story "Cataclysm" and the scans are posted in order so its not out of context. I can not spoon feed you anymore and if you continue to play ignorant and pretend the scans aren't in my link then I will ignore you.

Galactus fought a reality-destroyer who consumes universes, called black winter or star plague recently and nearly died.... Maybe he can fight Anti Monitor.